Zatzat:
mankind is stained with sin.why are some Christians splitting hairsWould you prevent married heterosexuals who secretly masturbate, from adopting children?
Well if it so secret,how the heck would I know about it?how/why would the kids know about it? the main idea is to refrain individuals from passing sinful styles of life from passing on to our children.they are our future and this ‘progressive’(I state that sarcastically)society that supports such behavior among kids brings forth more bad than good.True there are some individuals who try and pick and choose teachings from Christ as well as the Bible.There are several individuals who attempt to live within Christ but still struggle in sin.Though the actions among two groups are more similar than different, there is still the simple fact that at least the second are not lying to themselves anymore.Either way the world remains good or bad.there is nothing between.(this is more pondering)to shoot back to the main point, if a couple was openly putting their child into sin than it is a problem.Same with case in point no?a couple constantly putting a child into view of sin and producing an"it’s okay"title over it.
God chose to create a people who would respond physiologically to lust.
then again God created us within perfection with the choice to stay or leave.With the failure in staying, we were restricted in our abilities and introduced into new ones. sin is the action becoming astray from God to which early humans decided to
act.so maybe we were not created to respond to any thoughts as sex was not a tendency in Paradise (we did not need to and the knowledge was not there - tree of knowledge allowed knowledge of good and bad hence light and dark). so this apple(whether literal or metaphorical)created a transition into a new*'arena’
which God establishes a new/different biological creation from our original creation*(the above is just more thoughts as I explore what if as I type)**
Ask a child whose beaten by his heterosexual parents,if he’d happily have been adopted at birth by a homosexual couple who would provide for a stable,etc,etc and safe environment.
it’s like this.if he was raise within such a household, he could have become numb to the abuse and thought that such activity is normal.OR,the child would refuse due to the fact that his trust is broken and no matter how many times you try to present the opportunity,it will not be taken.The third option is that yes,of coarse he would take the change, but it is in desperation. if all you present is one variable between two groups and a person disagrees with one group, well that person would naturally chose the opposite. that is not how it works in life, however. there are more than just two decisions and two possibilities.
Now for some strong words;To suggest that a child being raised by homosexual parents, is in just as much danger of harm as a child who is beaten by heterosexual parents, is to seriously undermine the horrors that children of abuse suffer.
strange over emphasis on the importance of sex chromosomes when it comes to child rearing.You should first focus on love, safety, nurturing and stability.
Lets take of your last presentation here huh?you restrict the definition of harm to only physical comparison, when the word actually expands further to more than what may be seen.verbal abuse damages a child’s normal growth and into mental troubles into the future.As a parent, there is a strict importance to maintain child protection from all forms of danger…all forms of harm. This obviously includes sin. Our actions within sin harms our mental/spiritual stability and at many times physical. lets play out addiction here.gluttony. A person’s constant desire to eat is an addiction, like any addiction weakens the ability to resent and reject things that are not needed. This stretches into more actions than just eating…like a curse it will spread to other activities that we face through out the day. This is unarguably true with any addiction. This is also unarguably true for any age as well! so for that parent who raises their child in a manner that allows their gluttony for food exceed necessity, than that parent is putting their child into harm. Physical harm as it is unhealthy, but also other dangers that is still putting a child into harm regardless to parents thoughts or intentions. Those parents could be the best loving couple in the neighborhood who support their kid in all fields and love them extremely…however that danger is still there and therefore those parents are
still putting their child into harms way. So do you get the above point? no matter what the situation; noticeable/unnoticeable, physical or spiritual.it still is harmful! It still puts that individual (child or not)into harms way and risks development as well as well being.It does not matter what kind or style of sin it is. It does not matter if the affect is small or greatly noticeable.there will be an issue created.No as humans we are very limited in what we can do,and maybe in that respect you might explain what may have been missed, however God is not limited.A statement that you have been trying to explain with your reason towards why there is lust. why would you support it in such an instance, but then with this you create the assumption that God would not care or bother with one thing simply because it is less evil? guess what.
follow any form of evil and you will still end up away from GOD.
Not only that but whether you are a child, adult, or somewhere in between you will still be forced to deal with mental and in some cases physical hardship regardless. Do you understand what I am trying to say here? I am not saying one is worst than another or needs more attention than anything else.wrong is wrong regardless
