Why you should think that the Natural-Evolution of species is true

  • Thread starter Thread starter IWantGod
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Neuclotides and Codons are like an Alphabet. They are arranged in highly specific ways that are related to things beyond themselves, even before these things exist.
Vonsalza said:
signifies absolutely nothing besides what do can infer directly from it. Same goes for DNA
Click to expand...
To lurkers, when geneticists decode that a specific arrangement of Ntides refers to the eye, I assure y’all they are not hallucinating from DMT, folk. Tis real!
 
Techno2000 said:
40.png
Vonsalza:
40.png
Techno2000:
40.png
Vonsalza:
40.png
Techno2000:
40.png
Elf01:
40.png
Techno2000:
I love these magical vague environmental changes that could transform entire ecosystems alway for the better, until it produce 10 million perfect species. :roll_eyes:
Click to expand...
The organisms that could not adapt yo the change died.
Click to expand...
What kind of change, please be more specific.
Click to expand...
Sure. The KT boundary is a great example.

Before? Gigantic dinosaurs roaming the planet and oceans.

-BOOM!-

After? The colder, less lush environment could not sustain super-large animals. But who could thrive in such a harsh world? The little furry critters the dinosaurs used to snack on.

Enter: The Rise of the Mammals!

That’s right. Your great (x 13 million) grandfather looked sorta like a rat.
If it’s any consolation, he was my great (x 13 million) grandfather too. 🤣
(13 million derived using KT boundary of 65 million years ago divided by 5 year reproductive cycle average of all ancestors, just as a guess. Almost certainly a margin of error there).
Click to expand...
Cold temperature doesn’t explain the beauty of an Orchid, the flavor of an Asparagus or the bizarre mating habits of the Angler fish .
Click to expand...
Who said cold temperature explains those specific phenomena?
Click to expand...
So, what did, please be specific.
Click to expand...
Lets start with the first, you want me to explain why you think orchids are subjectively beautiful from an objective evolutionary perspective?

snicker
 
Read the first link. As usual, a pattern is repeating. At first, most don’t believe it. Then it’s a grudging possibility. Finally, it was true all along.
 
You haven’t heard? He has completed science before science has and knows for a fact what will be discovered and not in the future. OOL researchers are wasting their time and bagillions of dollars: They should come to CAF and read all these easy answers our members have in their back pockets, lol.
 
Vonsalza said:
40.png
Techno2000:
40.png
Vonsalza:
40.png
Techno2000:
40.png
Vonsalza:
40.png
Techno2000:
40.png
Elf01:
40.png
Techno2000:
I love these magical vague environmental changes that could transform entire ecosystems alway for the better, until it produce 10 million perfect species. :roll_eyes:
Click to expand...
The organisms that could not adapt yo the change died.
Click to expand...
What kind of change, please be more specific.
Click to expand...
Sure. The KT boundary is a great example.

Before? Gigantic dinosaurs roaming the planet and oceans.

-BOOM!-

After? The colder, less lush environment could not sustain super-large animals. But who could thrive in such a harsh world? The little furry critters the dinosaurs used to snack on.

Enter: The Rise of the Mammals!

That’s right. Your great (x 13 million) grandfather looked sorta like a rat.
If it’s any consolation, he was my great (x 13 million) grandfather too. 🤣
(13 million derived using KT boundary of 65 million years ago divided by 5 year reproductive cycle average of all ancestors, just as a guess. Almost certainly a margin of error there).
Click to expand...
Cold temperature doesn’t explain the beauty of an Orchid, the flavor of an Asparagus or the bizarre mating habits of the Angler fish .
Click to expand...
Who said cold temperature explains those specific phenomena?
Click to expand...
So, what did, please be specific.
Click to expand...
Lets start with the first, you want me to explain why you think orchids are subjectively beautiful from an objective evolutionary perspective?

snicker
Click to expand...
No,I just want to know what kind of environmental factors led to up to the Orchid being produced by evolution.
 
Rubee said:
You haven’t heard? He has completed science before science has and knows for a fact what will be discovered and not in the future. OOL researchers are wasting their time and bagillions of dollars: They should come to CAF and read all these easy answers our members have in their back pockets, lol.
Click to expand...
No, I’m just not committed to any conclusions before they’re supported. You know, like actual science requires.

No supernatural codes, mysterious hands or any other balderdash.

Anyone threatened by that should evaluate their dedication to reason.
 
I mean, how can scientists watch DNA code being read? It’s obviously possible.
 
Vonsalza said:
(complete with eye roll)

I don’t want to break up the fun denialist party
Click to expand...
Ahem…
Vonsalza said:
What you also need to consider is that there are lots of bits and bobs in our DNA that, and please get this, HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO PURPOSE WHATSOEVER.
Click to expand...
Barely 5 minutes later…
Vonsalza said:
No, I’m just not committed to any conclusions before they’re supported. You know, like actual science requires.
Click to expand...
LOL!!!
 
Last edited:
Wikipedia doesn’t scratch the surface. Around that time, someone saw the word “atomic” in a fiction story and sent agents. Elaborate calculations had to be made. This was not done by amateurs.
 
Rubee said:
40.png
Vonsalza:
What you also need to consider is that there are lots of bits and bobs in our DNA that, and please get this, HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO PURPOSE WHATSOEVER.
Click to expand...
Barely 5 minutes later…
Vonsalza said:
No, I’m just not committed to any conclusions before they’re supported. You know, like actual science requires.
Click to expand...
LOL!!!
Click to expand...
Would you like another citation supporting it?

On the other hand, I don’t want to break up the fun denialist party you’re having which seems to be the only spaces where ID can survive “scientific” inquiry

(complete with eye roll)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top