Why you should think that the Natural-Evolution of species is true

  • Thread starter Thread starter IWantGod
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Vonsalza said:
(complete with eye roll)

I don’t want to break up the fun denialist party
Click to expand...
Ahem…
Vonsalza said:
What you also need to consider is that there are lots of bits and bobs in our DNA that, and please get this, HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO PURPOSE WHATSOEVER.
Click to expand...
Barely 5 minutes later…
Vonsalza said:
No, I’m just not committed to any conclusions before they’re supported. You know, like actual science requires.
Click to expand...
LOL!!!
 
edwest said:
If material reality is all you can see then what are you doing here? Honestly.
Click to expand...
This particular sub-form?

I get good laughs.

“Evolution isn’t true because it doesn’t tell me why I think flowers are pretty”.
 
Vonsalza said:
“Evolution isn’t true because it doesn’t tell me why I think flowers are pretty”.
Click to expand...
“But I’ll totally pretend H20 is like DNA because read that somewhere one time or other and go all Evangelical on Junk DNA while claiming I’m waiting for the answers.” Dude, stop bragging. You can’t even keep your own thoughts straight.
 
Last edited:
Rubee said:
40.png
Vonsalza:
“Evolution isn’t true because it doesn’t tell me why I think flowers are pretty”.
Click to expand...
“But I’ll totally pretend H20 is like DNA because read that somewhere one time or other and go all Evangelical on Junk DNA while claiming I’m waiting for the answers.” Dude, stop bragging. You can’t even keep your own thoughts straight.
Click to expand...
👍

Lemme know when you find some evidence for that Intelligent Designer, won’t you? 😉
 
Vonsalza said:
Lemme know when you find some evidence for that Intelligent Designer, won’t you? 😉
Click to expand...
LOL. It’s in the design, bruh. You tell me when you find ANY magic molecules that produce code. It doesn’t even have to be about evo. I’ll accept anything from anywhere in the universe. 😏
 
But… but… there have to be magic molecules that automatically create life. By the way, ignore that man behind the curtain.
 
Pay for what? I must admit, I do watch all the dodging and weaving going on here. It’s a learning experience.
 
edwest said:
Pay for what? I must admit, I do watch all the dodging and weaving going on here. It’s a learning experience.
Click to expand...
Lol, they really do, they can’t go pass Natural Selection did it…Darwin left them lacking.
 
Natural selection did it? Natural selection can select anything at any time. And because the environment can change, it doesn’t kick alleged mutations into high gear. As you’ve pointed out - no environment, no nothing. Meaning, it has to be the right environment at the right time. Not “Sorry kid. You’ll be able to eat in a million years.”
 
Rubee said:
Still no magic molecules? Not even one? Oh wait…There’s H20 😏
Click to expand...
It’s just funny. It really is.

Any rational mind would see that if there’s a intelligent designer, then it wouldn’t be rational for there to be DNA in your body that does literally nothing.

And then we discover it.

So what to do? Feverishly deny it as best you can, because it’s evidence that an intelligent designer doesn’t exist, or it’s evidence that it’s not very good at designing.

I don’t blame the guys at evolutionnews.org for keeping the site up. They make plenty of money off this emotional need for validation (despite being about as reputable as something like tupaclives.com or flatearthsecret.com…)

It’s just not real science, guys. You have junk in your genome.

And that’s ok.
 
Last edited:
Vonsalza said:
It’s just funny. It really is.

Any rational mind would see that if there’s a intelligent designer, then it wouldn’t be rational for there to be DNA in your body that does literally nothing.

And then we discover it.

So what to do? Feverishly deny it as best you can, because it’s evidence that an intelligent designer doesn’t exist, or it’s evidence that it’s not very good at designing.

I don’t blame the guys at evolutionnews.org for keeping the site up. They make plenty of money off this emotional need for validation (despite being about as reputable as something like tupaclives.com or flatearthsecret.com…)

It’s just not real science, guys. You have junk in your genome.

And that’s ok.
Click to expand...
I think it’s fair to say the magic molecule has not been located yet.

And now we’re on to psychoanalysis^^^ LOL.
 
Last edited:
Vonsalza said:
Nothing miraculous to it. A mutation occurs, usually during reproduction. If it’s beneficial, natural selection will spread the mutation. If it’s not beneficial, natural selection will kill it off. What about that is difficult to grasp
Click to expand...
There’s nothing difficult to grasp if we confine the process you discribe to what is observed - in fact, this process is observed on a daily basis (ie, evolution within a species, aka microevolution). But what is difficult to grasp is how this process can explain genus-genus evolution and the fossil reocrd record. What you are offering is a very simplistic, dumbed-down explanation for a feat that is both ridiculously complex and ridiculously improbable - it’s like fantasy biology for babies.
 
Highly simplistic. It proposes a completely static environment and no guarantee the beneficial mutation will be passed on. The hope is the millions of years idea will make certain things inevitable. Scientists are just beginning to discover how ridiculously complex things actually are. The blind watchmaker is a fiction because it also lacks intelligence. It has no idea about what part goes where, how it fits and how that part is needed to make a whole, functional organism. Again, the mists of long ages is not a reason but a diversion. Scientists can no longer wait. They need to know how living things actually work. Fortunately, Crisper/cas9 exists and refinements are being made. That’s reality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top