Why you should think that the Natural-Evolution of species is true

  • Thread starter Thread starter IWantGod
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
edwest211 said:
When novelty is pursued and worshiped like a god, this is some of what can happen. A society devoid of a good belief system has no good choices left. Some people will propose anything and everything, especially things that are at variance with time-proven truths.
Click to expand...
"Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand."

from The Second Coming, a poem by W. B. Yeats, 1865 - 1939
 
Edgar said:
from The Second Coming, a poem by W. B. Yeats, 1865 - 1939
Click to expand...
Mother Shipton (16th century). “The great chastisement will come when carriages go without horses and many
accidents fill the world with woe. It will come when ‘thoughts are flying around the earth in the twinkling of an eye’ , when long tunnels are made for horse-less machines, when men can fly in the air and ride under the sea, when ships are wholly made of metal, when fire and water ‘great marvels do’, when even the poor can read books, when many taxes are levied for war.”
 
Last edited:
Muller complains that Neo-Darwinism has stalled because macroevolution is “explained” in terms of nothing more than the mechanisms that cause variations in populations (ie, microevolution), which he feels is inadequate. This is what creationists noticed a long time ago … “macroevolution = microevolution + time” doesn’t cut the mustard. But evolutionists have been happily deluding themselves with this childishly simplistic formula for 150 years.
 
looskanal said:
As I said…not a very good design if you’re expecting people to make free will choices.
Click to expand...
If much is given, much is expected…if little given, little is expected, God determines the responsibility of each person .
 
IWantGod said:
If intelligent design is true then why doesn’t the scientific community accept it?
Click to expand...
Deary me. You must have come down in the last shower. Short answer: The scientific community is dominated by an full-blown cult of atheism.
 
Close … Australian (we are basically descendants of criminals deported from the British Isles).
 
Woah. Your worldview choice does not interest me. And the whole 'beyond our control" thing is nonsense. If you’re smart enough to notice it then you’re smart enough to change it. With all due respect, this is not even a theory, it’s nonsense.

“I can’t control myself!” I think you can.
 
Last edited:
Funny, I heard the same thing about the ‘colonies’ in New England.
 
Last edited:
looskanal said:
40.png
Techno2000:
? 🤔…
Click to expand...
Evolution…the ultimate omnipotent designer.

You can’t negotiate with it, and you can’t avoid it.
Click to expand...
And you can"t prove it.
 
IWantGod said:
If God created species, then apart from animals that have gone extinct, all the animals that exist today should be no different from when they were first created
Click to expand...
God love you but this is a massive non-sequitur.
 
looskanal said:
The same way that it produced a brain that believes in a myriad other irrational beliefs. The brain isn’t designed to be rational. It’s designed to promote survival. It’s designed to keep the species alive.
Click to expand...
So it is an unreliable truth detector.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top