Why you should think that the Natural-Evolution of species is true

  • Thread starter Thread starter IWantGod
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Luckily for me I have an app that scans Posts for pretentious uses of Capital letters. It got as far as Existence and lit up. Then reached Source and sent me an automatic Warning. So sorry. I never Got to the Point where I could Actually read what you had Written.
 
The scientific community is dominated by an full-blown cult of atheism.
They have that much power? I think you give them more credit than they could possibly deserve. To me, this just looks like another conspiracy theory.
 
Evolution…the ultimate omnipotent designer.

You can’t negotiate with it, and you can’t avoid it.
You can’t reason with it.
You can’t trade with it.
You can’t convince it of intelligent design.
It feels no guilt or remorse.
And it absolutely will not stop…until you have evolved!!!
 
Last edited:
Questioning another’s understandings is how we can establish a dialogue, to share ourselves, as we come to know and love another more fully. It happens more face to face, rather than through detached interactions such as we find here, where as you say, we are likely to come to justify our beliefs.

I agree that, in search of the truth, we must question ourselves as to how we “know” what we “know”.

A journey that constitutes a lifetime cannot be summarized to fit into this format. Suffice to say that the outcome is a fundamental truth, which lies at the heart of my understandings - the reality of my personal existence, and its relationship with Existence itself, to which words can only point.

We can describe the nature of Existence as being relational, triune. As an image of our Source, we exist as persons-in-the-world, a connectedness of a particular kind of individual being, with what is other to it. Relationality is manifest throughout creation, where we find different forms of being expressing the particular ways in which they interact and combine in the formation of ontologically greater systems, which then demonstrate novel kinds of relatedness. As persons, regardless of our genetic make up, psychological as well as physical characterisics, and whatever blessings have been bestowed upon us, we are as individual expressions of mankind, now broken, and ultimately one in the communion of self and other that occurs when we give of ourselves, when we love, in other words. There is nothing more real, nothing of greater and lasting value. In these moments, we connect with that Perfect Relationality that is divine and eternal, from which all creation springs, here and now, as it was when, for the purposes of this thread, the first of every individual entity came to be as an expression of what they are. Creation is true, here and now and everywhere and at every time, each form of being in its moment.
Great poem.
 
Pope Benedict:

In the book, Benedict reflected on a 1996 comment of his predecessor, John Paul II, who said that Charles Darwin’s theories on evolution were sound, as long as they took into account that creation was the work of God, and that Darwin’s theory of evolution was “more than a hypothesis.”

“The pope (John Paul) had his reasons for saying this,” Benedict said. “But it is also true that the theory of evolution is not a complete, scientifically proven theory.”

Benedict added that the immense time span that evolution covers made it impossible to conduct experiments in a controlled environment to finally verify or disprove the theory.

“We cannot haul 10,000 generations into the laboratory,” he said.
 
Catholic Answers:

The Time Question​

Much less has been defined as to when the universe, life, and man appeared. The Church has infallibly determined that the universe is of finite age—that it has not existed from all eternity—but it has not infallibly defined whether the world was created only a few thousand years ago or whether it was created several billion years ago.

Real History​

The argument is that all of this is real history, it is simply ordered topically rather than chronologically, and the ancient audience of Genesis, it is argued, would have understood it as such.

Even if Genesis 1 records God’s work in a topical fashion, it still records God’s work—things God really did.

The Catechism explains that “Scripture presents the work of the Creator symbolically as a succession of six days of divine ‘work,’ concluded by the ‘rest’ of the seventh day” (CCC 337), but “nothing exists that does not owe its existence to God the Creator. The world began when God’s word drew it out of nothingness; all existent beings, all of nature, and all human history is rooted in this primordial event, the very genesis by which the world was constituted and time begun” (CCC 338).

It is impossible to dismiss the events of Genesis 1 as a mere legend. They are accounts of real history, even if they are told in a style of historical writing that Westerners do not typically use.

Adam and Eve: Real People​

It is equally impermissible to dismiss the story of Adam and Eve and the fall (Gen. 2–3) as a fiction. A question often raised in this context is whether the human race descended from an original pair of two human beings (a teaching known as monogenism) or a pool of early human couples (a teaching known as polygenism).
 
Catholic Answers:

The Time Question​

Much less has been defined as to when the universe, life, and man appeared…
Here’s your big chance, Ed. Tell us when you think it happened. Fearlessly nail those colours to the mast!
 
Please leave a message for Ed after the tone… 🙂
Bzzzzt.

Hey, Ed. It’s Bradskii. I saw that post you made about the age of the universe. People seem to think that you’re a young earth kinda guy. I was thinking that here’s a chance, rather than quoting vague paragraphs about what others think or propose or believe, that you could show the courage of your convictions and tell everyone what YOU think.

Otherwise, from what I can see, they will remain convinced you are a YEC and wonder about why you are afraid to admit it and hide behind vague comments and misdirection.
 
God uses it more than anyone else, for it’s Him and Him alone who’ll decide the most important distinction of all, who’s saved, and who isn’t. That is indeed the ultimate in survival of the fittest. We may disagree about the mechanism by which the future of mankind will be decided, but either way, it’ll still be survival of the fittest.
The mindless, ruthless, pitiless process of evolution is nothing at all like the principles of love, forgiveness and compassion that God judges humans by.
 
They have that much power? I think you give them more credit than they could possibly deserve. To me, this just looks like another conspiracy theory.
You seriously underestimate the power of the devil - who “deceives the whole world” (Rev 12:9). Oh, wait, I forgot … you don’t even believe the devil exists … too "unscientific for your enlightened mind? But you should believe in demons - Jesus did … and so does Pope Francis. Your Bible predicts a demonic global “conspiracy theory”, but you seem to scoff at that possibility.
 
Last edited:
You seriously underestimate the power of the devil - who “deceives the whole world” (Rev 12:9). Oh, wait, I forgot … you don’t even believe the devil exists … too "unscientific for your enlightened mind? But you should believe in demons - Jesus did … and so does Pope Francis. Your Bible predicts a demonic global “conspiracy theory”, but you seem to scoff at that possibility.
Accept science has inbuilt fail-safes designed to root-out pseudo-science even when it favours the biases of a particular group. Believe me, there would be no big-bang theory if science was really ruled by the arbitrary whim of atheists. And there certainly wouldn’t be such a thing as science if it were ruled by the whim of young earth creationists.

In fact i more respect the sceptical attitude of a hardened naturalist compared to a YEC…

…and yes i do believe the devil exists, i just don’t believe that God is so deceptive and stone-faced that he would allow the atheists to look correct and give them the tools of science to do it. I don’t think the atheists are correct, but rather i think some Christians like yourself have a warped idea of what God’s creation is all about and in reality God is using science to weed out ignorance and arrogance among the religious including the tendency to abuse the power of religion. In fact the devil would likely use YEC philosophy so that he can steer atheists away from religion!!!

You will often find the devil in his enemies camp. You know, wolves in sheep’s clothing and all. That’s when you get pseudo-creationism pretending to be the real thing.

The devil is turning everyone against everyone but his powers are limited.

Science is far from being the tool of the grand deception…it’s more like the great humbling.

Either God made a natural world that develops naturally into new forms over billions of years or God is deceiving us by making it look like that.
 
Last edited:
Of course it is true. We aren’t fundamental protestants who believe the universe is merely 6000 years old. Catholicism helped give birth to modern science in western civilization, such rejection of scientific facts would be heretical to rational thought
 
Last edited:
looskanal:
God uses it more than anyone else, for it’s Him and Him alone who’ll decide the most important distinction of all, who’s saved, and who isn’t. That is indeed the ultimate in survival of the fittest. We may disagree about the mechanism by which the future of mankind will be decided, but either way, it’ll still be survival of the fittest.
The mindless, ruthless, pitiless process of evolution is nothing at all like the principles of love, forgiveness and compassion that God judges humans by.
Well done, Edgar. Well said.
 
Of course it is true. We aren’t fundamental protestants who believe the universe is merely 6000 years old. Catholicism helped give birth to modern science in western civilization, such rejection of scientific facts would be heretical to rational thought
Not fundamentalists? Well, Paddy, I’m pretty sure you’re not. But hang around here long enough and you’ll meet a few. And yes, thy do actually believe the world is a few thousand years old.

Just try to get them to admit it though! They’re too embarressed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top