WikiLeaks Drops Proof That NYTimes Colluded With Hillary Clinton

  • Thread starter Thread starter Theo520
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
dvdjs said:
1753 A good intention (for example, that of helping one’s neighbor) does not make behavior that is intrinsically disordered, such as lying and calumny, good or just. The end does not justify the means. Thus the condemnation of an innocent person cannot be justified as a legitimate means of saving the nation. On the other hand, an added bad intention (such as vainglory) makes an act evil that, in and of itself, can be good (such as almsgiving).39
Click to expand...
Rich. Maybe Hillary should have thought of this during 2016.

As it stands, yes, Hillary is part of the Dems, and was back when this was going on. She was involved, ergo the Dems were involved.

No amount of spin will change this very simple fact.
 
7_Sorrows said:
Wikileaks is helping the American people see what rotten apples are in our government.

Right now, they are mainly democrats. I think if they had damaging information on the

republicans they felt the American people needed to know they would not hesitate

releasing it.
Click to expand...
They are wholly owned subsidiary of Putin and you are being conned.
 
7_Sorrows said:
Wikileaks is helping the American people see
Click to expand...
WikiLeaks publishes stolen materials that are spun into tales that, while truthy, are lies.
It does so to deliberately undermine the confidence of Americans in our institutions.
When it reaches such amazing levels as Americans seeing opposition parties as a greater threat than adversary nations, it has achieved its goal. Thanks for playing into their hands.
 
Raxus said:
As it stands, yes, Hillary is part of the Dems, and was back when this was going on. She was involved, ergo the Dems were involved.

No amount of spin will change this very simple fact.
Click to expand...
Sure. And not just the Dems, but the Methodists!
 
Proof please!

Yes Putin sent over operative to send incriminating emails from a NYT computer in the hopes that the Russian stooges over at Wikileaks would get their hands on them.

Good work team Hillary!
 
Imdaman said:
Proof please!

Yes Putin sent over operative to send incriminating emails from a NYT computer in the hopes that the Russian stooges over at Wikileaks would get their hands on them.

Good work team Hillary!
Click to expand...
I’ll let you do your own research and save the time on this matter as you have continuously ignored my requests to point out what is rude and refuse to read completely what I post.
 
Oh I didn’t know Hillary was vying for the presidency of the methodists too! I wonder which evil doer kept her from power there also.

She really is not have a good ending to her career to push her Agenda through both in politics and religion!
 
Imdaman said:
Right so no proof, got it!

Good work.

Have a Happy New year!
Click to expand...
How many links do you want me to provide today that you won’t read? How many times will you claim I’m rude and provide no insight into what exactly I said was rude? So, yes, there is evidence that you would have to read and critically analyze, but you have demonstrated that you have no desire to do so, so I’m not going to spend the effort. You can easily find some if you choose to.

EDIT: Oh, I see Stephen did the work for me. That will provide you a starting point.
 
Last edited:
Wow interesting read but I find no truth in this article pointing towards what JIggity claims "They are wholly owned subsidiary of Putin and you are being conned"

COuld it have been the Russians who hacked the DNC server, yes! Has there been any proof that has been brought forward except assumption, No!

The DNC could help clear this issue up quickly if they would release the computers these emails were allegedly hacked from.

There is also conjecture and a murdered man as possible evidence that it was an inside job. Untill evidence is produced either way I will take each of these as what they are a working theory.

But lets say RUssia did give them to wikileaks… So what! The emails are what they are!

Would it have helped if they gave them to CNN! Would CNN be accused of being owned by the Russians?

I would be interesed to see what CNN would do with all those Emails. Probaly pull a NYT and give the Clintons lots of warning before sending them out in a “Controlled manner”

I fail to see any significance to the source of the emails. The source does not change the email or does IT?
 
dvdjs said:
Sure. And not just the Dems, but the Methodists!
Click to expand...
Are there a lot of news articles being sent to high-powered Methodists for them to peruse and deflect / distract from?

Or is this just a meaningless comparison? I really think it’s the latter.
 
One doesn’t have to be Pope to read the catechism or to know the basic teachings of the church.
 
Raxus said:
peruse and deflect/distrsct
Click to expand...
Why do cling to this imagined, but debunked, view of the communications?

Can you show some pertinent eflection and distraction?
 
Last edited:
dvdjs said:
40.png
7_Sorrows:
Wikileaks is helping the American people see
Click to expand...
WikiLeaks publishes stolen materials that are spun into tales that, while truthy, are lies.
It does so to deliberately undermine the confidence of Americans in our institutions.
When it reaches such amazing levels as Americans seeing opposition parties as a greater threat than adversary nations, it has achieved its goal. Thanks for playing into their hands.
Click to expand...
My what an active imagination you have.
 
7_Sorrows said:
My what an active imagination you have.
Click to expand...
Imagination?
Hmmm… Let’s see.
  1. Code: 
    _WikiLeaks publishes stolen materials..._
A simple fact.
2. ….that are spun into tales that, while truthy, are lies.
This thread gives a nice example. As does the Vatican spring, etc.
3. It does so to deliberately undermine the confidence of Americans in our institutions.
Conjectural, but you don’t have to hear much from Assagne, or about Russian connects to have reasonable confidence in that conjecture.
4. … it reaches such amazing levels as Americans seeing opposition parties as a greater threat than adversary nations …
Sadly we have reached this point in American politics. Signposts like dog-sitting criteria abound. Or seeing WikiLeaks as patriotic. Shields & Brooks reflected on the radical change in attitudes at year end at NPR.
  1. Thanks for playing into their hands.
    Poster child.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top