JKirk,
protestants don’t (or shouldn’t say) that you are saved without works and baptism.It is by faith you have been saved thru faith,it is not of your own doing but a free gift of God.The guy on the cross was aved by this.
If you were on your deathbed would you have time to do good works or get baptized?No you wouldn’t.The guy on the cross beside Jesus shows us that you can be saved as long as you have breathe.What would you tell a man who is dying and never acknowledged Jesus as his Lord?You’re not gonna make it to heaven buddy,you haven’t done anything good and you’re not baptized?Please explain what you would say to such a person?
JW, for starters, you are incorrect that Protestants “don’t say that you are saved without works and baptism.” I have posted on this site for a couple of years and have heard this claim many times. What must be understood is that there is no one Protestant consensus on what “faith alone” entails. Some literally believe it means “intellectual assent alone,” while some believe faith must be accompanied by “trust, repentance, etc.” Thus, while I agree with you that Protestants “shouldn’t say” that, it is quite clear that many do anyways. Furthermore, many do so because it is the proper teaching of their denomination.
And as your continued point about the thief, we all agree with you. He was saved by grace alone, through faith. His faith in no way merited this grace, because nothing with finite value could merit an infinite reward, and our faith is finite despite being the gift of God. Thus, the grace received was not a strict payment for the man’s faith, but rather a reward for hearing God’s promise and heeding (Decree on Justification, 8). If you are saying that, I have no problem with your point.
As for what I would tell a dying man about the state of his soul, nothing! How could I possibly know. I might share the Gospel with him. I might ask him to believe unto the Lord Jesus. If he would, I would attempt to have a priest offer him the sacraments if it was possible. If that wasn’t possible, I would attempt to baptize him myself. I would then ask for God’s mercy and trust it it. It’s that simple. Yet, it would not be my place to judge him as eternally damned, but rather God’s place.
Finally, to reiterate, the thief was an extraordinary case. The normative means for receiving are rebirth is through baptism, as the Scripture points out quite clearly. Thus, I would expect that had the thief been able to, he would have received baptism for rebirth like the rest of Christians of his time and afterward.
Furthermore, God created the sacraments to save man, not man for the sacraments. Thus, God is not obligated to save man via the sacraments. Rather, He has chosen to by His manifest will. Thus, in such extreme cases, we can trust that in God’s mercy and that the fact that this man did not receive the sacraments, and was not able to go live his supernatural grace of charity, that God can still save this man if He so chooses. But in no way, can I intentionally resist God’s grace through the sacraments and in charity and wish to remain in His grace. That is an oxymoron. I hope that clarifies.