7
7_Sorrows
Guest
it definitely is already here then!The Church has not stated that the anti-Christ is necessarily a person.
Many theologians believe that the anti-Christ represents a heresy which will overtake the world.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7079e/7079e2364c7e6bc9a509f3429fba1fa1c93d7548" alt="Eek! :eek: :eek:"
it definitely is already here then!The Church has not stated that the anti-Christ is necessarily a person.
Many theologians believe that the anti-Christ represents a heresy which will overtake the world.
Yes, it’s possible for the AC to be a pope, although I’m quite sure it is not our current pope or any other we’ve known. They are very holy men.Could the AC actually be a pope? Is this possible?
I know that God said he would never desert his church, but what if there were two popes. I’m only using this as a hypothetical, but we technically have two popes living right now. Could one be the AC? Again, I’m not suggesting that one is- just pondering who the AC could be. I mean, what better place to hide the AC?
You may very well be right, but I am working on my PhD dissertation in Catholic theology and I have never heard of any theologian that says that.The Church has not stated that the anti-Christ is necessarily a person.
Many theologians believe that the anti-Christ represents a heresy which will overtake the world.
675 Before Christ’s second coming the Church must pass through a final trial that will shake the faith of many believers. The persecution that accompanies her pilgrimage on earth will unveil the “mystery of iniquity” in the form of a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth. The supreme religious deception is that of the Antichrist, a pseudo-messianism by which man glorifies himself in place of God and of his Messiah come in the fleshYes, it’s possible for the AC to be a pope, although I’m quite sure it is not our current pope or any other we’ve known. They are very holy men.
The AC will be seen as a very holy man, though.
Even if it would be a pope, Christ will not desert his Church. The “small remnant” will be the one’s who will be filled with the Holy Spirit. Whether that includes the pope (at the time, I am NOT speaking of Francis) or not remains to be seen.
There are have two popes in the past, and we have had popes in the past who were less than stellar. I suppose the AC could be anyone. We need to follow the words of Jesus, “You will known them by their fruits” and apply that to the AC as well.
I’m with you on this, I voted yes. The Church is already the first one to call out every new evil we invent and/or praise…as its said ‘he’ will appear to be a person of peace, who accomplishes great things, that look to be Godly and for the general good of everyone.
Personally, I think the CC will be the very first church to call it out, granted, I think the rest of the world will be calling the CC crazy at doing this, they will say “look at all this man has done, how can you call him the AC”? IDK, maybe this is the time Jesus warned about, when lots of people started hating the church. If the Vatican made an announcement like that, especially if the secular world was LOVING this person, it would be very bad for the CCs image.
Thank you for that part from the Catechism. You are right. The FP will be seen as a very holy man, who will clear the way for the AC, who most believers will revere and love. Scary, sort of. I have worked on my relationship with Christ my entire life, so the “end of days” does not scare me too much. It’s just hard to think of all the suffering that will take place.Lily Bernans;13383621:
675 Before Christ’s second coming the Church must pass through a final trial that will shake the faith of many believers. The persecution that accompanies her pilgrimage on earth will unveil the “mystery of iniquity” in the form of a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth. The supreme religious deception is that of the Antichrist, a pseudo-messianism by which man glorifies himself in place of God and of his Messiah come in the fleshYes, it’s possible for the AC to be a pope, although I’m quite sure it is not our current pope or any other we’ve known. They are very holy men.
The AC will be seen as a very holy man, though.
Even if it would be a pope, Christ will not desert his Church. The “small remnant” will be the one’s who will be filled with the Holy Spirit. Whether that includes the pope (at the time, I am NOT speaking of Francis) or not remains to be seen.
There are have two popes in the past, and we have had popes in the past who were less than stellar. I suppose the AC could be anyone. We need to follow the words of Jesus, “You will known them by their fruits” and apply that to the AC as well.
IDk about that, how could a heresy be injured in childhood and survive, how could a heresy commit supernatural acts comparable to what Jesus did, not to mention a heresy cannot stand in Gods house and call ‘himself’ the messiah.The Church has not stated that the anti-Christ is necessarily a person.
Many theologians believe that the anti-Christ represents a heresy which will overtake the world.
But theologians and experts on the Book of Revelation say even many in the Church will be fooled. Some saints have had visions that the Catholic Church will be split and there will be two popes, with most people following the false pope. No, he won’t be like your Facebook contacts. He will be a master deceiver who will pretend to be a man of God.I’m with you on this, I voted yes. The Church is already the first one to call out every new evil we invent and/or praise
The AC will be doing things that the WORLD perceives as good. He wouldn’t be doing REAL good.
I mean, by your short description alone we can already see how he would be. “A person of peace”, nowadays, would be someone like most of my facebook contacts - “every religion is true” or “you don’t need religion to be good”; “you don’t need God to be good”; he’d fight for sexual “freedom”, and the end of wars (perhaps by bombing places where war happens, like the middle east). He’d fight for women’s rights - “my body my choice”.
He’d give us the “perfect” society, free of God (and, thus, free of responsibility, free of love).
The AC would give solutions to problems, and no one BUT the Church would see that those solutions were bad by themselves.
Right now, people are already deceived by the devil. They already call good what is bad (say, sexual “freedom”), and call bad what is good (Chastity is a good example of it). They see evil, call it good, and despise the Church for being against it.
If/when the AC comes, the path will be ready for him to take over; people will gladly accept his coming, his “help”, his “teachings”.
And the Church will remain the only one to fight against all that; perhaps not every individual inside it, but the Catholic Church will remain solid against evil. Aren’t we persecuted for that now? When he comes, we will still be against him.
PS: every time I read or write AC I think of air-conditioner
PPS: this is just my :twocents:
I can understand why many believe this, but really, shouldnt the first time he shows people his supernatural abilities, he will reveal himself instantly…right? I mean, its not like people doing supernatural acts are a common thing, I dont think Ive ever heard of this happening, even going way back in history…??The FP and the AC will be very difficult to recognize.
That’s because everyone that ends up with the **“AC” **will be crying out for one.PS: every time I read or write AC I think of air-conditioner![]()
cjforJesus;13383677:
That’s not what the CCC says. It does not state that the AC will be a person. It states that it will be a profound heresy. Read it again.Thank you for that part from the Catechism. You are right. The FP will be seen as a very holy man, who will clear the way for the AC, who most believers will revere and love. Scary, sort of. I have worked on my relationship with Christ my entire life, so the “end of days” does not scare me too much. It’s just hard to think of all the suffering that will take place.
The CCC does not state that the AC will be a person.IDk about that, how could a heresy be injured in childhood and survive, how could a heresy commit supernatural acts comparable to what Jesus did, not to mention a heresy cannot stand in Gods house and call ‘himself’ the messiah.
Thats what he will want everyone to believe, that HE is Jesus returned, IMO, a heresy does not really fit the biblical descriptions, but Im sure the real AC will be totally fine with as many people as possible thinking it wont be a real person, those are people he wont even have to deceive.
Lily Bernans;13383728:
Ringl.That quote attributed to me was actually a response from Lily Bernans.This highlighted post attrinuted to Lily is actually by you.That’s not what the CCC says. It does not state that the AC will be a person. It states that it will be a profound heresy. Read it again.
I merely copy and pasted an entry from the Catechism regarding the pseudomessianism of antichrist.
You are absolutely correct, and the more people believe they will recognize the FP and the AC when they appear, the more likely they are to be fooled by them. The FP, many say, will “arise” from within the Church itself (and I’m not ]pointing to anyone at all). He will fool many of our bishops and other clergy, let alone the laity. And the Church will definitely not announce that “so-and-so is the FP or the AC.” There will be no easy way to recognize either one. A person must stay vigilant at all times and work on his or her personal relationship with Christ. Christ will not desert his true Church, but the AC will made it seem as such. The AC will make it seem as though he is a messenger of God.I hate to burst people’s bubbles, but I’d add some things:
- As to, for example, the church seeing evils as they arise, you mean like, perhaps “seeing” pedophile priests (or rather not seeing them)? The church is not now in any way some sort of watchdog against particular people. Ideas? Social movements? Maybe (certainly not a resounding yes). But if people think the church is going to pronounce “person x is the antichrist!,” I think they are all so clearly off base as to beyond discussion, in part because the church has absolutely zero recent history of officially condemning anyone in particular - and I mean anyone.
- I suspect/posit that the AC will fool so many people, so subtly, that only the most devout; strongest; etc., will not be fooled. I hate to say so, but this will be someone who will likely fool all the people on this board, including me. That bears repeating. He will fool virtually everyone. He will fool the geniuses; the ignorant; and anyone in between. Heck, I think intelligence alone will be useless to recognize him. Know this: he will be bad; he will be persuasive; and all of us - If God forbid we live that long - will all be sorely tempted and/or seduced to go along with him, with far more pressure than any of us have ever faced. Pray we never need to make that choice.
ringil;13383938:
Sorry, I got confuzzled.Ringl.That quote attributed to me was actually a response from Lily Bernans.This highlighted post attrinuted to Lily is actually by you.
I merely copy and pasted an entry from the Catechism regarding the pseudomessianism of antichrist.![]()
scborromeo.org/ccc/para/675.htm675 Before Christ’s second coming the Church must pass through a final trial that will shake the faith of many believers. The persecution that accompanies her pilgrimage on earth will unveil the “mystery of iniquity” in the form of a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth. The supreme religious deception is that of the Antichrist, a pseudo-messianism by which man glorifies himself in place of God and of his Messiah come in the flesh.
scborromeo.org/ccc/para/676.htm676 The Antichrist’s deception already begins to take shape in the world every time the claim is made to realize within history that messianic hope which can only be realized beyond history through the eschatological judgment. The Church has rejected even modified forms of this falsification of the kingdom to come under the name of millenarianism, especially the “intrinsically perverse” political form of a secular messianism.