Wisdom or Love - What Is Greater?

  • Thread starter Thread starter spockrates
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
God Is Love, a simple, true, literal statement.

Love is NOT an attribute of God but is God’s Very Being.

Is anything or anyone greater than God?
Tom:

I think that most people would agree that in the very least love is compassion. Since compassion is an emotion, does that mean my emotions are God? The logic is simple:

If G = God

and

L = love

and

G = L

then

L = G

If God is love, then love is God. Or the compassion I feel is what God is and nothing more! My though is that God is more than a feeling. What do you think?
 
You might be right, but I don’t yet know why. Please tell me: Why do you believe love is more than a noble, unselfish feeling? What evidence do you have either biblical or experiential to support the fascinating idea?
(I should like to study more of Phenomenology as JPII employed it and valued it in his thinking and writing as well. ) That is just a stray thought pertaining to our topic.

A feeling is just an impulse that lies before action takes place, there is a chasm of some sort that separates the thought and feeling from the deed itself, the action, that must be bridged.

Christ said no man hath greater love than to lay down his life for his friends. I think love must actually be in the will which manifests itself in an outwardly visible action. It is the crucifix, or a depiction of the crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth, that comes to mind when I think what the essence of love is.

It is not enough to have a feeling or emotion that is unselfish and noble because that feeling still can be acted or not acted on. When this impulse to love is not acted upon, nothing is really changed in the physical world, or perhaps i should say, the world of man, for the better. I am reminded, as an example, of the Parable of the Good Samaritan. Christ asked at the end of the parable, I think, which of the three men showed love to his neighbor. The answer was the man who acted.

Let me share with you a portion of one of my favorite quotes by Romano Guardini You may or may not find it relevant to our discussion, but I am reminded of it…

“The spirit [of a man] is articulated by his various **actions **and their relation in time…”

I reason more by intuition than by pure reason so it is therefore somewhat difficult for me to lay out a cogent rationale for why I believe certain things. I could simply say that they resonate with me, but that is not really sufficient an answer, I know.

St. John of the Cross said that at the end of time we shall be judged on love alone. Surely one does not think that “love” in this quote entails nothing more than an emotion we possess?? I think one can love, even when his emotions scream against virtue. Does a husband truly love his wife only when a feels like loving her, or does he truly love her when his action to do the good for her is carried out in spite of his emotions being absent or perhaps even pulling or pushing him towards a behavior towards her that does not contribute to her well-being.

Christ said as a condition or a “proof” that authentic love is present…

If you love me, you will keep my commandments.

That is an action. So I think love is bound up in the human act, which is actuated by the will.
 
Yes, I like your metaphor more. As for hate, I’m not sure I do understand what it is. Please define it for me.
I don’t need to define “hate”. Everyone knows what it is, unfortunately. Pure logic, will not separate one from that, but if you must, consider the cement truck.
 
I don’t need to define “hate”. Everyone knows what it is, unfortunately. Pure logic, will not separate one from that, but if you must, consider the cement truck.
Sorry for being clear as mud. I should have said I don’t know what you believe hate is. If you don’t want to define it, we may use this definition from reference.dictionary.com:

Hate is to dislike intensely or passionately; feel extreme aversion for or extreme hostility toward; detest.

So I would say hate is an emotion, never an action.

But what I don’t understand is what you mean when you say love is the opposite of hate. Do you mean this?
  1. Love is an action, never an emotion.
Or do you mean this?
  1. Love is an emotion, never an action, but it is a different kind of emotion than hate.
Do you believe love is (1) or (2)?
 
(I should like to study more of Phenomenology as JPII employed it and valued it in his thinking and writing as well. ) That is just a stray thought pertaining to our topic.
I had a memorable dialogue on an atheist forum regarding the topic of consciousness and how it relates to experience. The prevailing opinion was that God’s omniscience means the future is unchagable. So human free will is a myth and God is the cause of all evil.

To my surprise, I came to the conclusion that God is not omniscient, at least not in the sence that he knows all. For there is experiencial knowledge he never has, since he has never experienced what it is to sin. One might say that when Jimmy Hendrix sang, “Are you experienced? Well I am!” God would answer, “No, I’m not fully experienced. For I have not experienced all that you have.”

I then suggested that there are some things God chooses to not know. So he might choose to remain ignorant enough of the future to leave room for our freedom of will.
 
A feeling is just an impulse that lies before action takes place, there is a chasm of some sort that separates the thought and feeling from the deed itself, the action, that must be bridged.

Christ said no man hath greater love than to lay down his life for his friends. I think love must actually be in the will which manifests itself in an outwardly visible action. It is the crucifix, or a depiction of the crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth, that comes to mind when I think what the essence of love is.
Yes, but the difficulty for me when I carefully consider the words of Christ is knowing where the hyperbole ends and the literal begins. I mean, consider what he says right before the words you quoted:

“I am the vine; you are the branches. If you remain in me and I in you, you will bear much fruit; apart from me you can do nothing."

(John 15:5)

Christ, you and I obviously don’t have the DNA of a grapevine. So I wonder how literally I should take his words, “Greater love has no one than this–that he lay down his life for his friends. And you are my my friends, if you do what I say.”
It is not enough to have a feeling or emotion that is unselfish and noble because that feeling still can be acted or not acted on. When this impulse to love is not acted upon, nothing is really changed in the physical world, or perhaps i should say, the world of man, for the better. I am reminded, as an example, of the Parable of the Good Samaritan. Christ asked at the end of the parable, I think, which of the three men showed love to his neighbor. The answer was the man who acted.
Let me share with you a portion of one of my favorite quotes by Romano Guardini You may or may not find it relevant to our discussion, but I am reminded of it…
“The spirit [of a man] is articulated by his various **actions **and their relation in time…”
Wise words, those! And I believe Paul agrees when he writes:

Love must be sincere. Hate what is evil. Cling to what is good.

(Romans 12:9)

He then goes on with memorable advice:

biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans+12&version=NIV

What I believe he is saying is it is not enough to love. We must show our feelings of compassion are genuine by expressing those feelings with compassionate actions. What we do shows what we feel and gives those feelings authenticity, I think. But an expression of a feeling is not the same as the feeling itself.

So I wonder if Christ is not saying love is an act. I wonder if he is instead saying acts expressing the love we feel make such love real, genuine, useful and beautiful to others and to him.
I reason more by intuition than by pure reason so it is therefore somewhat difficult for me to lay out a cogent rationale for why I believe certain things. I could simply say that they resonate with me, but that is not really sufficient an answer, I know.
St. John of the Cross said that at the end of time we shall be judged on love alone. Surely one does not think that “love” in this quote entails nothing more than an emotion we possess?? I think one can love, even when his emotions scream against virtue. Does a husband truly love his wife only when a feels like loving her, or does he truly love her when his action to do the good for her is carried out in spite of his emotions being absent or perhaps even pulling or pushing him towards a behavior towards her that does not contribute to her well-being.
Christ said as a condition or a “proof” that authentic love is present…
If you love me, you will keep my commandments.
That is an action. So I think love is bound up in the human act, which is actuated by the will.
Perhaps it would help me to discuss the rest of John 15. After speaking of love, Jesus talks about hate:

“If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you."

(Verses 18 and 19)

Would you say the acts of persecution are hate? Or would you say such acts are not hate, but do reveal the hate felt by those who perpetrate them?
 
Tom:

I think that most people would agree that in the very least love is compassion. Since compassion is an emotion, does that mean my emotions are God? The logic is simple:

If G = God

and

L = love

and

G = L

then

L = G

If God is love, then love is God. Or the compassion I feel is what God is and nothing more! My though is that God is more than a feeling. What do you think?
We speak about “Love” in many ways, some of which are compassion, feelings, emotions, but Love is actually a Being.

It is written that we are “made in the Image…of God” and it is when we do anything with love that the “Image of God” shines thru us.

When you meet God, you will come to the realization that the statement, “God Is Love”, is quite literal and that love is NOT a mere attribute of God but is God’s Very Being.

Ever heard of God referred to as a “Consuming Fire of Love”?

This “Consuming Fire of Love” will one day burn away all that needs to be burned away and with some people, the only thing left just might be the “Image of God” that they were made in, but there will be something left.

Many tend to underestimate God.

Many also tend to put “limitations” on God when they put God in a “box”, no matter how nice that “box” is, the only “limitations” on God are those that are Self-imposed.
 
[SIGN][/SIGN]
Isn’t such learning what we call true wisdom?
Doesn’t Jesus say, “Suffer the little children to come unto me for I tell you such is the kingdom of God?” and “unless you become as little children, you will not enter the kingdom?” or am I confused.
If it is wisdom that caused a child to “love” then yes, perhaps wisdom is greater. Maybe it’s like some posters say, we need a definition for wisdom.

It just seems to me like it takes very little “wisdom” to love, and love can be done easily by all. And since Jesus recommends it to us in BOTH of the greatest commandments–Love God, and then Love your neighbor as yourself–it must be the greater.
 
[SIGN][/SIGN]
Isn’t he saying that we should learn how to love by imitating Jesus, just as children learn how to love by imitating their living parents? Isn’t such learning what we call true wisdom?
This is a good thing to ponder… I will think on it…
 
Yes, but the difficulty for me when I carefully consider the words of Christ is knowing where the hyperbole ends and the literal begins. I mean, consider what he says right before the words you quoted:

“I am the vine; you are the branches. If you remain in me and I in you, you will bear much fruit; apart from me you can do nothing."

(John 15:5)

Christ, you and I obviously don’t have the DNA of a grapevine. So I wonder how literally I should take his words, “Greater love has no one than this–that he lay down his life for his friends. And you are my my friends, if you do what I say.”

Wise words, those! And I believe Paul agrees when he writes:

Love must be sincere. Hate what is evil. Cling to what is good.

(Romans 12:9)

He then goes on with memorable advice:

biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans+12&version=NIV

What I believe he is saying is it is not enough to love. We must show our feelings of compassion are genuine by expressing those feelings with compassionate actions. What we do shows what we feel and gives those feelings authenticity, I think. But an expression of a feeling is not the same as the feeling itself.

So I wonder if Christ is not saying love is an act. I wonder if he is instead saying acts expressing the love we feel make such love real, genuine, useful and beautiful to others and to him.

Perhaps it would help me to discuss the rest of John 15. After speaking of love, Jesus talks about hate:

“If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you."

(Verses 18 and 19)

Would you say the acts of persecution are hate? Or would you say such acts are not hate, but do reveal the hate felt by those who perpetrate them?
Hmmm, well to me, what is to be taken literally and what is metaphor is fairly self-evident- particularly, the grapevine metaphor.

As to your last question, I think it could be both/and, however…sometimes people persecute us without intent…:)…I think we can all relate to that at some point in our lives.

I tend to look to giants and follow after them for the most part. That way I don’t have to figure everything out for myself, which is unlikely that I ever could, anyways. Aquinas is a favorite of mine, and I would like to read JPII’s “The Action Person”…It is sitting on my shelf awaiting my committed attention span, time, and likely a little push from the Holy Spirit. It’s deep reading but quite interesting.
 
Your post just before the last one, I have failed to reply to, it is a highly significant question, but might best be left for a thread all its own.
 
Sorry for being clear as mud. I should have said I don’t know what you believe hate is. If you don’t want to define it, we may use this definition from reference.dictionary.com:

Hate is to dislike intensely or passionately; feel extreme aversion for or extreme hostility toward; detest.

So I would say hate is an emotion, never an action.

But what I don’t understand is what you mean when you say love is the opposite of hate. Do you mean this?
  1. Love is an action, never an emotion.
Or do you mean this?
  1. Love is an emotion, never an action, but it is a different kind of emotion than hate.
Do you believe love is (1) or (2)?
I define “hate” as push away from. I define “love” as pull towards. If I “hate” something I do everything within my means to put that thing that I hate out of my life, to the point that it is not there.

Therefore “love” is anything (sorry I am talking in things because it is easier, the same is true of people) anyone that I want to draw into my life, I would give up my favorite chair for someone I love. That would make both “hate” and “love” both emotion and action.

The definition of wisdom is ?
 
We speak about “Love” in many ways, some of which are compassion, feelings, emotions, but Love is actually a Being.

It is written that we are “made in the Image…of God” and it is when we do anything with love that the “Image of God” shines thru us.

When you meet God, you will come to the realization that the statement, “God Is Love”, is quite literal and that love is NOT a mere attribute of God but is God’s Very Being.

Ever heard of God referred to as a “Consuming Fire of Love”?

This “Consuming Fire of Love” will one day burn away all that needs to be burned away and with some people, the only thing left just might be the “Image of God” that they were made in, but there will be something left.

Many tend to underestimate God.

Many also tend to put “limitations” on God when they put God in a “box”, no matter how nice that “box” is, the only “limitations” on God are those that are Self-imposed.
Not sure I understand. Are you saying that when I experience compassion, what I feel is not an emotion–what I feel is God? Or are you saying the love I feel for others is a different kind of love from the love God is?

🤷
 
-]/-]
Doesn’t Jesus say, “Suffer the little children to come unto me for I tell you such is the kingdom of God?” and “unless you become as little children, you will not enter the kingdom?” or am I confused.
Well, we might both be confused! Let’s see if we can put our heads together to help each other become more certain. I think what a child does is trust an adult. So Jesus might be telling us to trust him, even when we don’t understand. Such trust is faith, I think. But faith is not the same as either love or wisdom. Don’t you agree?
If it is wisdom that caused a child to “love” then yes, perhaps wisdom is greater. Maybe it’s like some posters say, we need a definition for wisdom.
It just seems to me like it takes very little “wisdom” to love, and love can be done easily by all. And since Jesus recommends it to us in BOTH of the greatest commandments–Love God, and then Love your neighbor as yourself–it must be the greater.
I think you have a much greater faith in humanity than I have in humanity or myself! When I read these words of Paul, I wonder if love really is easy:

4 Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. 5 It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. 8 Love never fails.

(1 Corinthians 13)

It’s hard for me to be patient with those who try my patience. It’s hard for me to be kind with those who are unkind to me. It’s hard for me to not be envious, boastful or proud when faced with those who threaten my job security. It’s hard for me to not dishonor or act selfishly toward or become angry with those who are doing their best to make me fail. And I could continue. In short, it’s easy for me to fail to love when others fail–or do not even try–to love me.

So yes, I know it’s easy to love those who love me and care about me. But loving those who seek to do me harm? No, it’s not so easy for me. But I do not doubt it is much easier for someone who is a rock like you.
 
Your post just before the last one, I have failed to reply to, it is a highly significant question, but might best be left for a thread all its own.
Agreed. But I’m not opposed to going in a different direction, if you want. As Socrates said, true philosophers are those who “care not whether their words are many or few, so long as they lead to the truth.”
 
Hmmm, well to me, what is to be taken literally and what is metaphor is fairly self-evident- particularly, the grapevine metaphor.
Yes, and I think that what makes the vine statement obvious is his involving us. I mean, if he had said, “I am the vine,” and left out, “you are the branches,” I think it probable that more Christians, today might be of the opinion that the earth is God. By saying, “you are the branches,” it is clear to most that such is not the case. But in other instances, it is not so easy to discern.
As to your last question, I think it could be both/and, however…sometimes people persecute us without intent…:)…I think we can all relate to that at some point in our lives.
You might be right. I suppose we’d have to examine an obvious example of an act that is not merely an expression of hate, but is hate itself. I suppose we could consider the crucifixion of Christ. What about the act makes it sure that it is hate, rather than merely a cause if hateful emotion?
I tend to look to giants and follow after them for the most part. That way I don’t have to figure everything out for myself, which is unlikely that I ever could, anyways. Aquinas is a favorite of mine, and I would like to read JPII’s “The Action Person”…It is sitting on my shelf awaiting my committed attention span, time, and likely a little push from the Holy Spirit. It’s deep reading but quite interesting.
Indeed! As Socrates said: “A wise man is not likely to talk nonsense. So we ought to carefully consider what he has to say.”

So what does one of the giants of which you speak have to say about love or wisdom?
 
I define “hate” as push away from. I define “love” as pull towards. If I “hate” something I do everything within my means to put that thing that I hate out of my life, to the point that it is not there.

Therefore “love” is anything (sorry I am talking in things because it is easier, the same is true of people) anyone that I want to draw into my life, I would give up my favorite chair for someone I love. That would make both “hate” and “love” both emotion and action.

The definition of wisdom is ?
Well, I think there might be instances where hateful acts can be committed without emotion, as with sociopaths. They are able to “push away” without feeling any animosity whatsoever. They are also able to “draw near” without feeling compassion. So one might say hate or love can sometimes be acts without any emotion. I also suppose that one can feel compassion or animosity but not act on such feelings. I myself have done so, and I think you must have done so, as well.

So what do you think about saying hate and love may be either emotions or actions or both?

As for wisdom, I like Socrates’ definition, which he and friends arrived at after some discussion: Wisdom is true opinion. But if hate and love can be actions, as well as thoughts, then what logical reason do we have to say wisdom cannot also be an action? We may say some acts are loving and some are hateful, and so love and hate must be actions. But then to be logically consistent–and fair to wisdom–we must also concede that some acts are wise, and so must be wisdom.

Does this sound wise to you?
 
-]/-]

So yes, I know it’s easy to love those who love me and care about me. But loving those who seek to do me harm? No, it’s not so easy for me. But I do not doubt it is much easier for someone who is a rock like you.
Rock-wanna-be! I have trouble with the enemies too!
What did Adam and Eve have in the garden of Eden? Love, wisdom? And yet they were not satisfied. When the serpent came along and offered knowledge of GOOD AND EVIL, they were more than ready to take a “bite.” So, the search for TRUTH began… and someone said Wisdom is the knowledge of truth. Did Adam and Eve not have wisdom and love in Paradise?
 
Rock-wanna-be! I have trouble with the enemies too!
What did Adam and Eve have in the garden of Eden? Love, wisdom? And yet they were not satisfied. When the serpent came along and offered knowledge of GOOD AND EVIL, they were more than ready to take a “bite.” So, the search for TRUTH began… and someone said Wisdom is the knowledge of truth. Did Adam and Eve not have wisdom and love in Paradise?
Perhaps Adam and Eve did not have wisdom since that comes with life experience. They, on the other hand, were living a sheltered life of bliss in the Garden of Eden. They had no need for work, money, or even clothes; in short, they had no worries. It was only after they had to leave Paradise that they became acquainted with pain and suffering, work, and the harshness of the world. But now they could also acquire wisdom in developing the social and cognitive skills necessary to adapt to their new world. And, I believe, their love for one another as well as for G-d also took on a deeper meaning. Judaism says that those who have sinned (all of us) have the unique opportunity to draw closer to G-d than we would have had we not sinned.
 
i would say wisdom is the greater virtue; as far as i can see it is a much rarer commodity
You cannot have wisdom without love .
Wisdom comes after a lifetime of learning and loving. It,is the fruit of those two
working in harmony in your being under the Holy Spirit .

It is truly rare in western societies, which are too materialistic and non reflective.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top