Sam called it right.
First, you have to understand how revolutionary St. Paul’s teaching was back then. Ephesians was written at a time when women were chattel. A man could divorce his wife just by telling her three times she was divorced. They didn’t have alimony and child support in those days and few “working moms.” A woman was left at the mercy of others. Along comes Christianity and sings a new tune: Women are worthy of dignity. A man should love his wife just as his own body! Like Christ loved His Church! (He was willing to die for Her.)
This was revolutionary stuff! A man would love his wife on par with himself?
THAT is the issue. Everyone speaks of submission in that reading and they ignore the husband’s obligation in the deal.
In this day and age, be wary of a man who does not have a deep and abiding love for God and a submission to God in his own life insisting YOU follow this reading. (Learned from hard experience myself.

)
It’s not one-sided.
A man who loves God and loves you like his own self will never demand you do anything that would be to your own detriment. His every “command” would be in your best interest. With a good man. Make sure you have that first. Or nothing else will go right.
When you marry, you become one flesh. You become part of your husband’s body, and he yours. Do you order your hand to do something that would hurt it? Does your hand refuse to submit to your brain? Do you think if you told your hand to wipe your eyes that your hand would think it was a doormat for complying?
I don’t mean to reduce the argument to absurdity, but that’s the way marriage SHOULD operate.
Pope John Paul II wrote a lovely encyclical on the family: Familiaris Consortio. In it he discussed the differing natures of men and women. Men by nature are more analytical. They are the head of the family. The wife is more emotional. She is the heart. Every living organism needs a head and a heart. Decisions made by the heart alone can be flaky. Decisions made by the head alone can be stone cold and cruel.
A wise couple makes the decisions with the head listening to the heart. But if there is a conflict, at the end, the head rules. There can’t be a two-headed organism in nature. They are freaks. They don’t live long. No company exists long with two CEOs. Eventually in an important dispute, one person’s decision has to be final. That’s what the church teaches. That decisions should be made together. In love for each other and for the Truth and in the light of submission to God and each other.
The word doormat is nowhere in there.
If your fiance doesn’t appear to live up to any of these requirements, don’t be in a big hurry to marry him until you can sort things out.
Your husband to be should have enough respect for your own common sense that he won’t need to order you around. You should have enough in common with your values that there won’t be huge disputes about whose word is final.
And both of you should have a close enough knowlege of Christ and the church and your own relationship with God so that you submitting to your husband like the Church submitting to the mind of Christ and him loving you like Christ loving the Church doesn’t seem fanciful or odd.
Know what your fiance really believes before you agree to submit to it. If he’s in line with God, you’ll both do just fine.
