D
dzheremi
Guest
You and I are actually in agreement on the Palestinian issue, so plase stop yelling at me.Hold on here–that was not my idea at all! Nononono. If Jews wanted an entirely Jewish state, they had no right to FORCIBLY EXPEL the existing population. They did it anyway. People have done it for centuries. I’m telling you that THEY DIDN’T HAVE THE RIGHT.
And please forgive me for having taken you seriously when you wrote this:
I had assumed that it meant exactly what it appears to mean, but perhaps I misread you. I apologize.If Jews just want somewhere to be Jewish, then they ought to have gone somewhere that wasn’t already populated with non-Jews
For the last time, Sister Amy, I recognized that Christianity has a history of conquest and violence in my original post. Do I need to state it again in bold so that you won’t accuse me of playing favorites? Christianity has its own history of violence and conquest every bit as disgraceful as the Islamic conquests that I do not think are in any way justifiable. Better? Again, my point was not that Christianity is without its own shame, but that the initial spread is absolutely not comparable to the intial spread of Islam. Intial spread. Not what the Europeans did beginning in the age of colonization, or for that matter what Muslim traders did in Indonesia in the 13th century. Obviously it was probably much better to be an Indonesian convert to Islam in the 13th century than it would be to be a Mayan…well, basically ever. Economic connections in both cases make strange bedfellows. What can I say? I excuse nothing of the bloodthirsty conquerers of any religion, because my religion says to wipe the dust from your feet and move on should anyone not accept your message. To the extent that my fellow Christians have often chosen to do other things, I hope someone has been around to ask them what good it does a man to gain the whole world if in the process he loses his soul. Does Islam have any similar axiom to prevent the forced conversion of un-interested people? “No compulsion in religion” is often invoked, but abrogation being a principle unique to Islam I can never tell what I should take as the truth of what Muslims are required to believe.I am not suggesting at all that religions can’t spread. But you’ve made a serious mistake here thinking that Christians don’t have a history of conquest. Because they absolutely do.
Didn’t I say that in my original post? I believe I did. Also, was the invasion of Visigothic Spain during the time of the Rightly Guided Caliphs? The Islamization of Berber and Coptic North Africa? It is easy to make blanket statements, but harder still to ignore the history of the native peoples of those areas (who are NOT Arabs, and were NOT Muslims until they had by and large lost the battles to hold onto the Christianity and Judaism that was native to them prior to Islam).Violent and oppressive? The spread of Islam was absolutely not violent or oppressive during the rule of Muhammad, nor during the rule of the Rightly Guided Caliphs, as they are called. It is what you see once the lands of Islam became ruled by Empires. Precisely the same situation as Christianity. Precisely the same.
I could ask you the very same question, since all you seem to have gotten out of my original post is “Islam bad; Christianity good”!Why should Jews have to leave Palestine? I don’t think they should have to. Just like I don’t think anyone else should have to. Have you not been paying attention?
Umm…you could do that, I guess. This is not really a comparable situation. It’s pretty silly, actually. I sure wouldn’t want to pretend that I am home in Mexico City, and my grandma (who is still alive now) was born there!My family is originally from England. Should I go to England today, centuries later, and declare that I am home. Or isn’t America my home now? My family has been here for generations. And as far as I am concerned, it is my home.
Okay.For that reason, I see Jews living in Palestine today as being in their home–not because their ancestors of millenia lived there, but because they have grown up there. Similarly, Palestinians living in Palestine have just as much right because they have also grown up there. What I don’t think is possible is for the Jews to take the right of the Palestinians away–for the Jews to take the land where Palestinians lived, and to expel the Palestinians.
Same to you, since for the millionth time: you and I are in agreement about Palestine! We agree! I am not disagreeing with you on this issue! Most of my post did not have to do with that.I’m convinced now that you’ve never understood my position on Palestine–perhaps I have poorly articulated it, but I would be far happier for you to stop making assumptions about it. What I propose is peace and equal rights for all the people living in Palestine. Forcing either to live, or subjugating one to the other, is nothing but injustice.