Here in the USA it did become a huge issue in the 60’s when the “women’s movement” made it an issue. Many feminists made a big point out of keeping their family name instead of taking their husband’s name to the point that they equated taking the husband’s name to slavery, of all the silly things.

I remember Roseanne Barr saying she wouldn’t take her then husband Tom Arnold’s name because she wasn’t his or anyone’s else’s property. Then it occurred to her that her own family name was her father’s name, which made her his property (according to her odd logic), so she decided she’d be knows as just Roseanne. I hope your country never went through such nonsense, but we in the USA certainly did and it still affects many of us, hence the reaction against feminist ideology that equates taking the husband’s name as giving him absolute power over his wife. Another odd idea they promoted, and some still promote.
Yes, and if it’s not a cultural norm in your country, then it isn’t a big deal, nor should it be if it’s never been an issue. Unfortunately, it has been a big issue in the USA. For a long time women couldn’t identify themselves as feminine because that meant they were slaves to men. Women had to be feminists so they could get ahead and “throw off the chains of domestic slavery.” Only in the last few years have women in the USA begun to feel they can be feminine again as well as be strong and capable and have careers. But a great deal of damage was done to families along the way, which we are trying hard to correct, which is why some of us feel so strongly about it.
Well, I’m actually Asian-Canadian, so I do know where you are coming from
My post was addressing the idea of changing last names from a Catholic standpoint, since the poster I was replying to implied that we would have our husband’s last names in heaven and that not doing so was anti-feminine/ not in line with Catholic tradition. Just wanted to remind us all that the Church is universal
I was also responding to the idea that women shouldn’t make a big deal out of changing something so trivial as a last name, but obviously, as we can agree, last names are not trivial.
I would never criticize a woman for changing her last name, especially as feminism is supposed to promote more rights and freedom for women, not restrict it. It does symbolize family unity and togetherness, when everyone has the same last name, and I think that is beautiful.
At the same time, I don’t think women should be criticized for making the decision
not to change their last names.
There was definitely a time in history, in the west, where married women were indeed expected to change their last names. I am glad that there is no longer such strong societal pressure to change my last name, not because doing so would make me a slave to my husband, but because there are so many reasons why a woman would not change her last name. It is her name, and even if she sticks to her maiden name because she thinks it’s unfair, it doesn’t automatically make her a radical feminist. And it doesn’t make her any less feminine.
If last names were really of such symbolic importance (same last name= family togetherness), then I think hyphenation would be most ideal. Or having a new last name altogether. After all, marriage is when the man and woman leave their family and join together to become one flesh. But hyphenation can result in super long last names, and a new name would just be confusing for everyone.
Last names are a big deal for another reason in my culture, interestingly. Women didn’t change their last names, but that didn’t mean gender equality for us either. Traditionally the mother’s side of the family was seen as the “outsider” since they had a different last name. And of course, the desire to continue the family name= lots of pressure to have sons.
.