T
thomfra
Guest
Out of interest. how many hours a day do you work.As a farmer, I work 7 days a week, 365 days a year, and am on-call 24 hours per day. Why? Because I enjoy it.
Out of interest. how many hours a day do you work.As a farmer, I work 7 days a week, 365 days a year, and am on-call 24 hours per day. Why? Because I enjoy it.
So. What has it given you? The standard of living in western/northen europe is comparible if not higher. To what end are you working these hours?What is getting lost in the comparison of U.S. work hours with European is that not only do we work more hours than the Euros, our per-capita production is higher than that of any European country.
DaveBj
We spend differently. The average officially-poor American has around as much floor space per person as the average European, period. We have much more fuel. We don’t spend on groceries and clothing as heavily but Americans eat out more, play more expensive sports and generally have more toys, e.g. fitness equipment and games. It’s hard to compare standards of living across countries.So. What has it given you? The standard of living in western/northen europe is comparible if not higher. To what end are you working these hours?
I agree. Personally, I see positives and negatives in both situations. However, both are too large to actually make fair generalizations. Are you going to compare the standard of living in Des Moines, Iowa to London, England? How about comparing standard of living between Arnhem, Netherlands to New York, New York.We spend differently. The average officially-poor American has around as much floor space per person as the average European, period. We have much more fuel. We don’t spend on groceries and clothing as heavily but Americans eat out more, play more expensive sports and generally have more toys, e.g. fitness equipment and games. It’s hard to compare standards of living across countries.
Some people think that doing one thing, all your waking moments is a miserable life, but if you’re working a 70 hour week for ths sake of your family, then I can understand that.Some people talk about free time as if it were a sacrament, a sacred duty, and about work as if it were the equivalent of greed, a vice. They’re not living in the world I inhabit. If I’m an hourly employee, I’m working as many hours as I can and taking all the overtime I can get. If I’m salaried, I’m putting in as many hours as I can stand to shore up my position with the company and to advance. If you’re not, you’re the guy I’m passing.
.
If your contracted to work a set number of hours, then to be obliged to consistently work beyond them is theft on the part of an employer.Merely having a job is a blessing not granted to everyone and not giving the job the best I have is ingratitude. When I work, I try to give my work to God, and to work with a quality that would please him. Also the job is not guaranteed and if I don’t earn it while I can, I may not have another chance.I owe it to my family to do my best for them, and working hard is putting my family first.
I have found that people who set non negotiable boundaries with their work time frequently place undo burdens on their co-workers to pick up the slack.
.
Leisure time also includes time to meet friends, time to meet a potential marriage partner, time to simply see a different view. Begrudging this of people if the typical attitude of employers who want their staff to treat their jobs as if it were their religion. I exist to make money for my boss, his shareholders, and if I make reference to the outside world, then I’m a slacker. Let me ask you, can you talk to your co-workers in the break/lunchbreak? Some people’s workplaces are very cold and isolated places, to suggest their entire lives should consist of being there is… unreasonable.Finally, leisure time is a function of prosperity. Those who know privation are doing whatever they can and as much as they can to keep going. For a slacker to call the hard worker materialistic is simply projection.
I would rather that the government not dictate to me how much I am allowed to work, much less force everyone to adhere to some arbitrary standard for a “work life balance.” Some people like to work 60 hours a week, others don’t- people should be able to make that choice for themselves.In most countries, resource management (with some exceptions) dictates, that you have enough people on the job so that there is a work life balance.
I would rather that my doctor not be told by some bureaucrat that he can’t operate on me because of some arbitrary standard. If my doctor is smart enough to get through medical school, then he is probably smart enough to decide for himself when he needs to take a break.In Norway its a 37.5 hour working week, 40 in Australia-. Overtime paid if required. It’s not effecient or productive to work 60 hour weeks (you can find plenty of evidence on that, just google it). I would rather my doctor is well rested when he slices me open.
Well, I suppose that if you already believe the government should dictate how we balance our work and leisure time, it wouldn’t take much effort to convince you that the government should dictate who is allowed to reproduce.Anyone who would rather work 10 hour days 7 days a week rather than spend time with there kids probably shouldn’t have had them in the first place.
So, a person can’t work that much just because they want to, or because they enjoy their job?Some people think that doing one thing, all your waking moments is a miserable life, but if you’re working a 70 hour week for ths sake of your family, then I can understand that.
Is it completely out of the question that a person should talk to their boss and either remind them of their contract terms or renegotiate their contract to account for the increased hours?If your contracted to work a set number of hours, then to be obliged to consistently work beyond them is theft on the part of an employer.
Once again, if someone hates their job then they should either a) talk to their boss about it to try to improve things, b) talk to their bosses’ boss about it to try to improve things, or c) start looking for another job- that can be a great way to “simply see a different view.”Leisure time also includes time to meet friends, time to meet a potential marriage partner, time to simply see a different view. Begrudging this of people if the typical attitude of employers who want their staff to treat their jobs as if it were their religion. I exist to make money for my boss, his shareholders, and if I make reference to the outside world, then I’m a slacker. Let me ask you, can you talk to your co-workers in the break/lunchbreak? Some people’s workplaces are very cold and isolated places, to suggest their entire lives should consist of being there is… unreasonable.
I enjoy computer games, but I wouldn’t want to play them for 70 hours a week. People work those hours ussually out of neccessity, sometimes the job demands it, sometimes they are scared of losing it, sometimes they have issues going on in their lives and use work to ‘escape’, and no I don’t agree with government mandated hours.So, a person can’t work that much just because they want to, or because they enjoy their job?
.
Do you work? Expressions of dissatisfaction make you a problem person. Goodbye to the chance of promotion, goodbye to even a half-decent reference.Is it completely out of the question that a person should talk to their boss and either remind them of their contract terms or renegotiate their contract to account for the increased hours?
Or, and I know this probably sounds crazy to you- why not start looking for another job?
.
This may come as a shock, but managers don’t generally care about whether employees are happy. There are lots of unofficial rules, everyone want’s to appear professional, so no social interaction outside of work hours takes place. Any reference to being happy or unhappy, or your life outside of work, does not go down well and it’s the same in most work places.Once again, if someone hates their job then they should either a) talk to their boss about it to try to improve things, b) talk to their bosses’ boss about it to try to improve things, or c) start looking for another job- that can be a great way to “simply see a different view.”
.
It’s more often a choice their employers make.I would rather that the government not dictate to me how much I am allowed to work, much less force everyone to adhere to some arbitrary standard for a “work life balance.” Some people like to work 60 hours a week, others don’t- people should be able to make that choice for themselves.
.
No, employees make their own choices- the choice you make is based on what risks you are willing to take and what consequences you are willing to accept.It’s more often a choice their employers make.
Yes, i have worked my entire life.Do you work? Expressions of dissatisfaction make you a problem person. Goodbye to the chance of promotion, goodbye to even a half-decent reference.
Well, you can either whine about it or you can do something constructive about it- even if that means quitting. It is your choice.This may come as a shock, but managers don’t generally care about whether employees are happy. There are lots of unofficial rules, everyone want’s to appear professional, so no social interaction outside of work hours takes place. Any reference to being happy or unhappy, or your life outside of work, does not go down well and it’s the same in most work places.
Any wage earner who really believes that he is completely helpless has made himself a slave. Unions and excessive government interventions only reinforce this sense of helplessness and convince us that we would be slaves without them- which is just another form of slavery.Oh and the only thing protecting wage earners from longer and longer hours is … the legacy of unions, and government with terrible socialist labour laws, like overtime rates and health & safety requirements.
Constructive criticism does not involve anything the interferes with the bottom line, hours and work culture of the organization. That’s how I read it.Yes, i have worked my entire life.
Have you ever supervised or employed anyone?
There is a difference between expressing dissatisfaction in a constructive, solution oriented way, and being the office whiner.
I have always had an open door policy for employees who want to talk about things in a constructive manner and wanted to understand the process behind those policies and decisions they disagreed with- I generally saw this as a positive attribute, and never sanctioned any employee for coming to me in this way. In fact, I usually try to put these people into management positions because they have the capacity to see the bigger picture.
On the other hand, I have no patience for whiners- those employees have lots of complaints but no solutions, who are generally unable to think about their role in the larger system or process, harbor a deep sense of entitlement. As it turns out, these types of employees generally turn into the worst kinds of managers because they don’t care about their employee’s opinions anymore than they care about their manager’s.
.
People in low income or entry level positions do not have endless choices. There is less bargaining power, and pay rates are fairly standard across industries (eg service industry). It’s not as though people can simply opt out of the labour market and go live off a plot of land. In such circumstances labour laws protect workers from excessive hours/extreme low pay, I’m open to the idea that they can go too far (crazy grievance cases) But the fact that you think reliance on such things is indicative of a ‘slave mentality’ sounds like a back-handed insult to those who you have to pay a minimum wage or overtime, when you’d rather not.Well, you can either whine about it or you can do something constructive about it- even if that means quitting. It is your choice.
.
Sounds like gobbledegoop to justify removing some very basic laws that would allow a company to save on labour costs, if I may put it that way.Any wage earner who really believes that he is completely helpless has made himself a slave. Unions and excessive government interventions only reinforce this sense of helplessness and convince us that we would be slaves without them- which is just another form of slavery.
And something stopped you from being able to dismiss or discipline those staff?I have hired many people who do not know what it means to work. Prosperity has changed expectations. I had a person walk off the job after I gave him a dollar an hour raise. It was not enough. I had a young man leave the office to get a coke and not come back. Workers won’t come in and won’t call to tell you why.
As you said God, family, *then *work. In that order. An old saying. Work to live, not live to work.I got my first job when I was 12 years old mopping floors and washing dishes. I gave the money I made to my parents to pay for my books. That year I started at a parochial prep school that allowed me to enter high school after the sixth grade. The tuition was expensive, but three priests came, talked to my parents, and said not to worry about the money. I waited tables in the cafeteria instead of taking recess to pay for my lunches. By the time I graduated from college I had clerked in a store, parked cars, sold shoes, been a deck hand, and short order cooked.
The best life lesson I ever got is “hustle”. A man who had gotten me a job parking cars told me I was embarassing him for recommending me and I was about to get fired. I asked what I could do to change things. He said “You gotta hustle, boy. When a car pulls in, you run to get that car. You go park it. You run back for the next one. That’s hustle.” I did and I kept the job and I haven’t stopped hustling ever since. I was 16.
For many years, when the kids were little, I worked two jobs to help make ends meet. My wife worked as well.
I have hired many people who do not know what it means to work. Prosperity has changed expectations. I had a person walk off the job after I gave him a dollar an hour raise. It was not enough. I had a young man leave the office to get a coke and not come back. Workers won’t come in and won’t call to tell you why.
But for me, it’s God, family and work in that order. People who find fault with putting it all on the line for a job, want to call it materialistic or want to call not taking vacations some kind breach of social justice (heard that one in church), to me that’s prosperity talking, not need.
Odd that you didn’t notice the conspicuous lack of “government” in that heirarchy.As you said God, family, *then *work. In that order. An old saying. Work to live, not live to work.
Who me? Never!Odd that you didn’t notice the conspicuous lack of “government” in that heirarchy.
You’re slipping:thumbsup:
Constructive criticism does not involve anything the interferes with the bottom line, hours and work culture of the organization. That’s how I read it.
You’d have to be crazy to bring up how you ‘feel’ about working weekends or not being able to take a couple of weeks leave at the end of the year. It’s a short-cut to redundancy or job stagnation and being tagged as a whiner, as you’ve put it. Employers rely on the fact that individuals quite naturally don’t feel inclined to complain about such things.
So what’s left? Unions and labour laws set in place by government. Yay for that.
We wouldn’t have anything resembling a fair (or safe) workplace if it wasn’t for the Unions. We have a lot to thank them for.
People in low income or entry level positions do not have endless choices. There is less bargaining power, and pay rates are fairly standard across industries (eg service industry). It’s not as though people can simply opt out of the labour market and go live off a plot of land. In such circumstances labour laws protect workers from excessive hours/extreme low pay, I’m open to the idea that they can go too far (crazy grievance cases) But the fact that you think reliance on such things is indicative of a ‘slave mentality’ sounds like a back-handed insult to those who you have to pay a minimum wage or overtime, when you’d rather not.
Sounds like gobbledegoop to justify removing some very basic laws that would allow a company to save on labour costs, if I may put it that way.