G
guanophore
Guest
I think this was the statement to which he was referring. The issue here is that the book of Hebrews is, among other things, addressing persons who have apostasized (fallen away after believing). The dispute started over Heb. 6, with uses the word apostasize. The OSAS say that the people referenced in this passage were never saved. Catholics say that one cannot fall away from something one never had. If we look at chapter 10, we can get more clarity:Part of the letter deals with apostasy, and those who are Christ’s will never apostatize, and they will never perish.
Heb 10:26-37
26 For if we sin deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, 27 but a fearful prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire which will consume the adversaries. 28 A man who has violated the law of Moses dies without mercy at the testimony of two or three witnesses. 29 How much worse punishment do you think will be deserved by the man who has spurned the Son of God, and profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and outraged the Spirit of grace? 30 For we know him who said, “Vengeance is mine, I will repay.” And again, “The Lord will judge his people.” 31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.
32 But recall the former days when, after you were enlightened, you endured a hard struggle with sufferings, 33 sometimes being publicly exposed to abuse and affliction, and sometimes being partners with those so treated. 34 For you had compassion on the prisoners, and you joyfully accepted the plundering of your property, since you knew that you yourselves had a better possession and an abiding one. 35 Therefore do not throw away your confidence, which has a great reward. 36 For you have need of endurance, so that you may do the will of God and receive what is promised.
37 "For yet a little while, and the coming one shall come and shall not tarry;
The writer is speaking of “we” which implies believers, and speaks about deliberately sinning after being redeemed. One cannot "spurn the son of God’ unless one first comes to know and apprecieate who He is. Clearly the writer is speaking about people who belong to the blood of the covenanent in which they were sanctified (Christ). He speaks about the Lord judging His people. Those are the ones that are called by His name. The writer speaks of suffering that occurred after enlightenment, and encourages them to persist (endure). Why would these words be addressed to non-elect persons?