J
JimG
Guest
When all the cars are electric, how are we going to dispose of all those batteries?
Bury them I guess. At least it’s one solution to reducing carbon emissions.When all the cars are electric, how are we going to dispose of all those batteries?
Why would you say that?Oops I accidentally voted wrong on my poll but it’s fairly even.
I bet that the people that don’t believe in man made climate change are over 40 years old
I expect the Holy Spirit is behind Earth Day, not a day of protesting for increased govt socialismDo you know how many countries experienced the protests so far. The Holy Spirit works on God’s time, not ours, or what is convenient to make a point.
Old enough to remember the climate decades ago, compare to today, and note the differences…or lack thereof.I bet that the people that don’t believe in man made climate change are over 40 years old
There never was a global cooling crisis. And I’m 71.Also old enough to remember the global cooling crisis…
You’re right.There never was a global cooling crisis. And I’m 71.
When I said “I expect” I indicated it was my opinionWhere is your proof?
You mean like the way Dems charge practically every Trump supporter as racist?JonNC:![]()
The charge of “socialism” has been so over-used so as to deprive it of all its meaning.And here, in one sentence, is the actual goal of the climate change political movement: statist socialism.
Is every Democrat promoting the end of capitalism?LeafByNiggle:![]()
You mean like the way Dems charge practically every Trump supporter as racist?JonNC:![]()
The charge of “socialism” has been so over-used so as to deprive it of all its meaning.And here, in one sentence, is the actual goal of the climate change political movement: statist socialism.
Defending the indefensible? I certainly would never defend white supremacy, which itself is a form of identity politics and intersectionality. I think all of it should be condemned. Do you agree?“Identity politics”. “Intersectionality”. Why do people think explaining a well-known term with a couple of undefined and confusing terms is doing anything but muddying the waters?
I understand.That post was directed at Leafs statement that the charge of socialism is so overused that it has lost its meaning. And in much the same vane, the way that practically every Democrat has tossed the word racism around, it too has lost all of its meaning.
I know what white supremacy means. I have only a wikipedia definition of intersectionality, and I can’t say as how it relates to white supremacy. Identity politics is a little clearer in how it would relate to white supremacy and I can see how white supremacy would be a special case of indentity politics. But what is your point, and how does it relate to “Worldwide climate change protests”?LeafByNiggle:![]()
Defending the indefensible? I certainly would never defend white supremacy, which itself is a form of identity politics and intersectionality. I think all of it should be condemned. Do you agree?“Identity politics”. “Intersectionality”. Why do people think explaining a well-known term with a couple of undefined and confusing terms is doing anything but muddying the waters?