T
tafan2
Guest
No, but it doesn’t make it any less true. Weddings are supremely important to society, evidence would suggest that is universally understood.
My mother in law made the dress and my bro in law gifted the food and my mother and her husband gifted us the honeymoon trip. I paid for everything else. I would expect the same for any future son in law of mine. A little help is fine. I myself accepted those 3 gifts but I would want him to pay the bulk of it.Were you always expected to pay? Was that always the understanding?
A lot of couples today pay for their own wedding. Especially as the marriage age is closer (or above depending where you live) 30… my wife and I certainly paid for our own wedding. Didn’t expect anything nor get anything from my father-in-law.
Definitely, but wouldn’t it make sense to be okay with the wedding then? Since their arrangement would no longer be sinful?Not only is co-habitation a bad idea if you are interested in preserving a life-long marriage, but it’s contrary to the teaching of the church. It is the sin that keeps on giving as it is a public repudiation of God’s law
Look at the big picture. With luck and prayer, your son-in-law will be with you for life. Grand-babies may come along, too, and if things stay congenial, there will be years of Thanksgiving dinners, school plays, and Fourth of July barbecues.But how punitive should we be?
I would not pay for any weddings for any children.
Having the bride’s family pay for the wedding is an old-fashioned tradition dating back to a time when women came with a dowry and couples were super young with no money.I didn’t think people still did that. Let them pay for it themselves