YATL (Yet Another Trump Lie)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Abrosz
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
JonNC:
Yes, it is different
Thank you.
But since it is Trump, it is easy to see why some reject would reject the virtue of it.
More curious was the reluctance to own it.
Not me. As I said, all presidents start looking toward reelection on Inauguration Day or sooner. No reason to think Trump would be different.
 
None of those president’s held televised campaign rallys in their first and second year. None.
The Democrats certainly didn’t need them. They had the DNC media every evening on the news doing it for them. Reagan went around them with his radio and tv addresses. Elder Bush naively thought he’d get a fair shake, and W was fortunate enough to run against Kerry.
 
I thought the buck would never stop with him and I was right. There must be someone else to blame for everything
 
I thought the buck would never stop with him and I was right. There must be someone else to blame for everything
Are you defending the communist Chinese?
Or their allies in WHO?
Or are you saying that it must be Trump’s fault ? After all, orange man bad
 
Last edited:
It means there was a time in their presidency that they dedicated to public service.
 
Campaigning is seperate from governing. He governed less.
Trump’s campaigning has never interfered with his governing.

If anything would interfere with his governing it would be the endless harrassing and bullying from the democrats that he has had to deal with daily. It must really irk you and others that he hasn’t buckled under their ugly attacks and he keeps
fighting. So the daily smearing continues.
 
40.png
JonNC:
Do you think that means they weren’t thinking out, keeping one eye on re-election?
No. neother did hey set up a scheme for fund raising and campaigning.
Please explain why this bothers you so much?

So you are saying the democrat party never sent letters to registered democrats asking for money until it was time for re-election?
 
So you are saying the democrat party never sent letters to registered democrats asking for money until it was time for re-election?
I have said no such thing, nor does it have any relevance. The party is a different organization than the candidates campaign.
 
The party still raises money for the candidates. And you are saying there were no letters sent out to democrats asking for money for Obama?
 
The party still raises money for the candidates. And you are saying there were no letters sent out to democrats asking for money for Obama?
I have said no such thing, nor does it have any relevance. The party is a different organization than the candidates campaign.
 
So the campaign could have been raising money, but you don’t know and the party could have been raising money as well, but you don’t know?
 
Please explain why this is a problem.
What promoted me to post, as I noted several posts ago, was the suggestion that Trump was not doing anything that other presidents had not done.

Beyond this, the problem of eternal campaign include the drifiting into Hatch ACT violations by the WH and the further deterioration of whatever sense is left that the POTUS works justly on behalf of all Americans, not just those who vote for him. This deterioration hampers his leadership in a crisis - like the pandemic where he seems to favor some states over others,
 
Last edited:
Beyond this, the problem of eternal campaign include the drifiting into Hatch ACT violations by the WH and the further deterioration of whatever sense id left that the POTUS works for justly on behalf of all Americans, not just those who vote for him. This deterioration hampers his leadership in a crisis - like the pandemic where he seems to favor some states over others,
I rarely had the sense that President Obama was working on my behalf. His policies increased my healthcare costs, decreased my healthcare rights and those of tens of millions of Americans, imposed regulations that required people of faith to contribute to practices their religious faith opposes.

But one thing he did that did not interfere with my rights was campaign and raise money for his re-election.
 
Well, if his leadership has not been hampered by the constant harrassing and bullying actions of the democrats who have initiated investigations and attacs against him continuously the past 4 years, I don’t see how campaigning would cause him to be unfocused on his job. It probably makes him more focused.
The campaigning angers the democrats because of the hundreds and thousands of people who fill the arenas to see him.

@dvdjs
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top