Yes, in hell, but why forever

  • Thread starter Thread starter MaximilianK
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The priest remember has seeked forgiveness on previous occasions for the same sin, he has found it hard to let go and on this occasion he happened to lose consciousness while the sinful act was taking place, had he lived he would have probably gone to confession again and asked the priest for forgiveness, he may have been able to live for the rest of his life without sinning mortally but that is obviously impossible to know now he had died.
 
The priest remember has seeked forgiveness on previous occasions for the same sin
Correct, hence why God may have willed the plane to hit his house , Sodom and Gomorrah style. Perhaps God realized he wasn’t going to change and was sick and tired of him committing the same sin.
 
The priest remember has seeked forgiveness on previous occasions for the same sin
And was forgiven for it. Yep. 👍
he has found it hard to let go
And, in certain cases, this is sufficient to reduce the sin from “mortal” to “venial.” Not always, according to the teaching of the Church. But it’s a possibility. So, we don’t know that God would judge this a mortal sin. But, that’s far above our pay grade to decide.
had he lived he would have probably gone to confession again and asked the priest for forgiveness
Perhaps he would have. Like I said, this is why sin is so terrifying – this can happen! And probably does! And we should be so concerned that this might happen that we should shrink away from the near occasion of grave sin!
he may have been able to live for the rest of his life without sinning mortally
Perhaps, but it’s immaterial: he did sin gravely. And there are consequences for grave sin.
 
I think that is unreasonable, after all it was the priests desire that he repent, it was his desire that he approach someone for forgiveness in the moment he dies, how can God just say “you have had enough chances”
 
he had repented on previous occasions, maybe he thought when he was sinning that he would hopefully live one day without sinning, i know it makes no sense but then commiting mortal sin is nonesensical, it does not mean it should not be forgiven though.
 
maybe he thought when he was sinning that he would hopefully live one day without sinning,
if he sinned with conscious knowledge he was sinning and with intent of “i’ll just confess this and get rid of it later” that makes it worse than sinning without conscious knowledge of sinning
i know it makes no sense but then commiting mortal sin is nonesensical, it does not mean it should not be forgiven though.
committing moral sin isn’t nonsensical because it feeds the sensual pleasures, thus its no mystery why humans do them. however, it doesn’t guarantee a right to be forgiven, if you die between the act and confession. Just another reason to regularly go to confession and not to commit moral sins whenever possible.
 
Last edited:
Why did Jesus talk so much about forgiveness if he wont forgive in certain circumstances? As long as the penitent is willing to change why wont God let him confess?
 
Why did Jesus talk so much about forgiveness if he wont forgive in certain circumstances?
No such circumstances. The man is dead, hence there is no petition of forgiveness being rejected. Again, this is being made into Jesus or God’s problem when it is the sinner’s problem. All sinning involves risk. That is the key point being missed.
 
The man may not be dead, just because his body has been wrecked does not mean his soul can still not be attached to it, there is still time for change I pray, as St Faustina said: God’s mercy sometimes touches the sinner at the last moment in a wondrous and mysterious way. Outwardly, it seems as if everything were lost, but it is not so. The soul, illumined by a ray of God’s powerful final grace, turns to God in the last moment with such a power of love that, in an instant, it receives from God forgiveness of sin and punishment, while outwardly it shows no sign either of repentance or of contrition, because souls [at that stage] no longer react to external things. Oh, how beyond comprehension is God’s mercy! But - horror - there are also souls who voluntarily and consciously reject and scorn this grace! Although a soul is at the point of death, the merciful God gives the soul that interior vivid moment, so that if the soul is willing, it has the possibility of returning to God. But sometimes, the obduracy in souls is so great that consciously they choose hell; they make useless all the prayers that other souls offer to God for them and even the efforts of God Himself… (1698).
 
commiting mortal sin is nonesensical, it does not mean it should not be forgiven though.
It is forgiven – when there is repentance and a commitment to not sin again. That’s what’s missing in your thought experiment.
Why did Jesus talk so much about forgiveness if he wont forgive in certain circumstances? As long as the penitent is willing to change why wont God let him confess?
Your example doesn’t demonstrate a “penitent” who is “willing to change”. It demonstrates a sinner who is staying put in his ways.
 
The Epistle to the Hebrews says (9:27): " It is appointed to men to die once, and after that comes the judgment". Then, “Each one will receive his pay, according to his works” (1 Cor 3:8).
 
He was willing to change, he went to confession often but he happened to sin again, it happens all the time that people confess and then sin again, there is no reason why God cannot forgive.
 
Last edited:
He was willing to change
Past tense. That contrition led to forgiveness of the past sin, not future sins.
it happens all the time that people confess and then sin again, there is no reason why God cannot forgive
Agreed. And, what it takes is a new contrition (for the new sin) along with a firm purpose of amendment. That isn’t present in your example.

Your example is kinda like saying, “he should be paid for the work he would have done in the next month, if he were alive.” He isn’t; and he didn’t do the work; so he doesn’t get the benefit of the work he did not perform.
 
What I say here is that the church needs to clarify it’s teaching on when death occurs and on the exact process of death, you see a dead man lying in the street after a bomb has gone off, it looks dead, limbs are missing and there is no heartbeat or breathing. That body and soul may well be somewhere else that is neither Heaven, Hell or Purgatory, it could be in the presence of the saints where it can Confess it’s sins and learn from the mistakes it made during it’s lifetime, why not? why does it have to be dead?
 
What I say here is that the church needs to clarify it’s teaching on when death occurs and on the exact process of death, you see a dead man lying in the street after a bomb has gone off, it looks dead, limbs are missing and there is no heartbeat or breathing. That body and soul may well be somewhere else that is neither Heaven, Hell or Purgatory, it could be in the presence of the saints where it can Confess it’s sins and learn from the mistakes it made during it’s lifetime, why not? why does it have to be dead?
Those are mysteries. The Church’s mission is not to know things that belong to God alone, but to work with what we have as human beings. The mysteries of faith should call us to be more human now. And that means making the decision to follow God.

The Church’s mission is to exhort people to repent and believe the Good News. To borrow a common phrase from the Gospel of Mark, do it immediately.
 
I agree with you but it is still nice to have a sort of back up if things go wrong which is why I advocate for an intermediate state between losing consciousness and death. It is comforting.
 
That body and soul may well be somewhere else that is neither Heaven, Hell or Purgatory
You know where the body is. The question is whether it’s still connected to the soul.
it could be in the presence of the saints where it can Confess it’s sins
Souls do not confess sins. People confess sins. If the body is dead and the soul is alone, it’s past the point at which it can appeal for forgiveness.

Anyway, we don’t confess to saints. We confess to priests. In the flesh. That confession must be aural.
learn from the mistakes it made during it’s lifetime, why not?
A disembodied soul cannot ‘learn’.
 
The body and soul are just somewhere else, they have not been separated! could it not confess to a saint that was a priest? Padre Pio could take care of such cases.
 
I agree with you but it is still nice to have a sort of back up if things go wrong which is why I advocate for an intermediate state between losing consciousness and death. It is comforting.
When things go wrong we get on our knees and take responsibility before God. “Immediately”, to use one of Mark’s favorite phrases.

We hope for the salvation of every person and live accordingly, appreciating what it takes to hold up our end of the relationship.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top