Yes, in hell, but why forever

  • Thread starter Thread starter MaximilianK
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You are right there but many people on here and elsewhere in the church say that if you die suddenly with only imperfect contrition God is only able to condemn you to Hell on account of the sins you have committed.
 
Last edited:
many people on here and elsewhere in the church say that if you die suddenly with only imperfect contrition God is only able to condemn you to Hell on account of the sins you have committed.
Because that is what the Church teaches.
 
I wish the church would have a more optimistic teaching on the subject so souls feel less anxious.
 
I know where youre coming from but i think there needs to be a more reasonable discussion on the subject of death and sin, i went to confession and the priest had a go at me for confessing the same sin time and time again when other parishioners who confessed to him went longer periods of time without confessing the same sins again and again, maybe i have a sin problem but it would be nice if the church had a more merciful and compassionate view on those who struggle to get rid of their sins.
 
God does not do the logically impossible. “A taste of hell” – where ‘hell’ implies eternal damnation – is logically impossible. Therefore… no: God will not give “a taste of hell”
It is not logically impossible, any more than putting a person in prison for a short while gives them a taste of what life in prison means. It is not the same, but keep in mind that the question is if you would do this for your own adult child if your child is hell-bent (p.i.) on their decision. Would you, or would you not do this (taste of hell), in order that they might make a more informed decision?

Please, just answer the question. It is a yes or no question.
You’ve got to nuance that, or else it’s untrue: God loves all . (Full stop). God forgives those who are contrite unconditionally.
Jesus did not wait for contrition when He forgave the crowd. There were no conditions.
Contrition, used in the way you did, is a condition.

This does not necessarily lead to universalism. There is always a matter of choice, even if it appears impossible.
God neither imposes unjustified punishment nor does the logically impossible.
I never suggested imposing any punishment, justified or unjustified.
I would also point out that the whole idea of the story is that the ghosts are attempting to coerce Scrooge into virtue by scaring the daylights out of him! They are doing what is clearly immoral: doing something evil so that good may come of it!
It is human nature, and chimpanzee nature, for that matter, to punish wrongdoing. The punishment is hurtful, but it is not evil. What the ghosts are doing is scary, but not evil. Keep in mind that it is a very serious sin to say “the Spirit is not working there” when the Spirit is indeed working there. The Spirit works in various ways, it is best not to second-guess what the Spirit is doing.
And if the son had died in his sin, the father would not have stopped him from doing so
This has absolutely nothing to do with the point I was making, or this discussion for that matter.
It’s that contrition that warrants forgiveness – not simply the unhappy experience of the fruits of sin!
Again, your image of God is such that His forgiveness depends on the state of mind/heart of his child. It is a very natural image, an understandable image, but it is not the only image of God that is available to humanity.

If you have an open mind, you might be able to see that many people have a different image of God than you do. Of course, many people also share your image of God concerning this aspect.
 
Last edited:
1453 The contrition called “imperfect” (or “attrition”) is also a gift of God, a prompting of the Holy Spirit. It is born of the consideration of sin’s ugliness or the fear of eternal damnation and the other penalties threatening the sinner (contrition of fear). Such a stirring of conscience can initiate an interior process which, under the prompting of grace, will be brought to completion by sacramental absolution. By itself however, imperfect contrition cannot obtain the forgiveness of grave sins, but it disposes one to obtain forgiveness in the sacrament of Penance.52
Fauken is right. And I believe that, as it’s a change of heart prompted by the Holy Spirit, and if you…
was driving to Confession
I personally believe that God who searches the heart and mind would take this into account.

Edited to add: I realise I was in error. The prodigal son started out with imperfect contrition but had perfect contrition before he even reached the father. Imperfect contrition does require confession to the priest to receive absolution.
 
Last edited:
I won’t go into each thing.

There is a condition for reception of the Beatific Vision, baptism and final penitence, and we have no certainty about salvation. That is a dogma of faith.

Council of Trent:
If any one saith, that he will for certain, of an absolute and infallible certainty, have that great gift of perseverance unto the end, - unless he have learned this by special revelation; let him be anathema. (Sixth session, Canon XVI)
 
Last edited:
If we have no certainty of our salvation then how can us maybe going to Hell be a freewill choice? after all we are not certain we are going to Hell yet choose it anyway? Also could someone be more certain of going to Hell than going to Heaven?
 
Last edited:
It wasn’t imposed on her. … To think that God will impose His will on us is the “worst scenario.”
God has imposed (and will impose) his will on you left, right and center, over the course of your entire existence. He created you, quite apart from your consent. You were given a certain IQ. You came into the world in a certain race, class and gender, etc. He sent you certain friends. Gave you particular parents, siblings, weird uncles, etc, etc, etc. I don’t quite have the patience to repeat the examples I gave above of all the innumerable factors that have nothing to do with your freedom or choice–all of which are imposed on you. You didn’t determine any of them.

So, the problem is not with God determining certain things in our lives–his governance and providence are such that he is doing this at every turn. The problem you want to have is that a Person (who knows better than you what is good for you and who loves you better than the best earthly father) should not continue to love you after the “magic moment” of death. You want God to merely be the judge imposing the sentence. He has no interest in loving those in Hell. The only “good” here, as I’ve said, is their continued existence. But, I wonder whether that is such a good after all. 1,000,000 annual suicides suggest that existing in a state of suffering is not a good at all. Rather, it’s an awful thing that some humans insist on escaping.
“hey, I’m gonna let you suffer through your life on earth, but don’t worry: nothing you do really matters anyway, because at the end, I’m gonna force you to choose me, even if you don’t want to!”
Rather, God would say, “The suffering that you, my child, have endured during your life here on earth has been immense, but I was always there with you. And know that your suffering brings you nearer to the earthly life of my Son. All things that you do here matter. My son gave many parable to this effect, to say nothing of the law and the prophets. There will be no equality in heaven. That would be unjust. Those who have been last here on earth will be first there in my kingdom. Those who have stored up for themselves treasures in heaven, will reap those rewards. You, my poor child, are so confused and selfish and angry that you cannot have not been able to see these things clearly, though you have had your suspicions. But you, like all my other beloved creatures were made for bliss. The promise I gave to the prophets and apostles is that I would make all things new. I would take away all suffering and all death. Deep inside of you, you know that you are made for beatitude. You are not made for suffering. Although you are not yet ready to enter into my kingdom, all of my creatures–all the angels and saints–will be praying and working for your good, even though you will be in a place of punishment for the horribly selfish things you did, especially to those most vulnerable who needed your help and love. I made you, and you were not a mistake that I will cast away forever. I will never stop loving you.”

Or some such thing as that…
 
Last edited:
If we have no certainty of our salvation then how can us maybe going to Hell be a freewill choice? after all we are not certain we are going to Hell yet choose it anyway? Also could someone be more certain of going to Hell than going to Heaven?
Because it is not symmetric. One is saved through grace, but must cooperate with it. One is lost through rejection of grace, not because God wished it.

Catechism
1864 “Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven.” There are no limits to the mercy of God, but anyone who deliberately refuses to accept his mercy by repenting, rejects the forgiveness of his sins and the salvation offered by the Holy Spirit. Such hardness of heart can lead to final impenitence and eternal loss.
 
Last edited:
It is not logically impossible, any more than putting a person in prison for a short while gives them a taste of what life in prison means.
No, it gives them a taste for what prison life means. Important distinction. 😉
Would you, or would you not do this (taste of hell), in order that they might make a more informed decision?

Please, just answer the question. It is a yes or no question.
This question is even more clear than the question about God’s choice: No. Unjust punishment is unjust punishment. From the catechism:
1753 A good intention (for example, that of helping one’s neighbor) does not make behavior that is intrinsically disordered, such as lying and calumny, good or just. The end does not justify the means. Thus the condemnation of an innocent person cannot be justified as a legitimate means of saving the nation.
Jesus did not wait for contrition when He forgave the crowd.
Actually, He asked God to forgive them, based on the fact that it wasn’t a mortal sin (i.e., “they do not know what they do”).
I never suggested imposing any punishment, justified or unjustified.
Going to prison “to get a taste of it” isn’t imposition of punishment? C’mon, now – you’re making your position even more ludicrous if you’re gonna try to assert that!
it is a very serious sin to say “the Spirit is not working there” when the Spirit is indeed working there. The Spirit works in various ways, it is best not to second-guess what the Spirit is doing.
Claiming that the Spirit is working in a fictional character, or in the work of fiction of an author, seems more like an unsafe claim. 🤷‍♂️
This has absolutely nothing to do with the point I was making, or this discussion for that matter.
It has everything to do with it. We’re talking about allowing a person to die in their sin. That’s precisely the point here – and the father in the prodigal son parable would have allowed it.
If you have an open mind, you might be able to see that many people have a different image of God than you do.
I recognize that many do. And, I’m not discounting the mercy of God. I’m just not making up stories that go beyond the teaching of the Church. 🤷‍♂️
 
He created you, quite apart from your consent. You were given a certain IQ. You came into the world in a certain race, class and gender, etc. He sent you certain friends. Gave you particular parents, siblings, weird uncles, etc, etc, etc. I don’t quite have the patience to repeat the examples I gave
That’s probably a good thing, since I would feel compelled to rebut them again. 😉

The fact that my biology is a certain way does not compel my choices. I still have free will, and I would have it regardless of my race, gender, hair color, or IQ. By pointing at “differences”, you’re setting up a straw man of “impingement”. It just ain’t so.
You, my poor child, are so confused and selfish and angry that you cannot have not been able to see these things clearly, though you have had your suspicions.
Ding ding ding! Give that man a kewpie doll!

You’ve got it! That is precisely the criteria for which a grave sin is not a mortal sin!

…the problem is, that’s not the case we’re talking about. We’re talking about those who do have the capacity to choose. Unless you want to claim that none of us do, then you’re using the case of “grave but venial sin” as if it applies to all grave sin. It doesn’t.
 
Last edited:
So when a mortal sinner rejects grace, why does God allow them to live instead of dying straight after committing a mortal sin, why does he let them live with a chance of being able to ask for forgiveness?
 
No. Again: not the greatest good , but an inviolable gift .
Granting me the “gift” of allowing me the “freedom” to end in a state of suffering and torment indefinitely into the future is hardly any gift at all. As I said earlier, with a god like that, who needs enemies?
“Duration” is the red herring in this argument.
Did you happen to notice the title for this thread? A “forever” Hell is precisely what is being discussed. Severity and duration could not be any more relevant in matters of justice.
Fine. Where’s the justice in eternal bliss in return for finite love ? Either both heaven and hell are disproportionate, or both are just. Which is it?
Unlike you perhaps, I freely accept that God’s grace extends to all and is quite unmerited. So, his grace and mercy go beyond justice. Actually, this is true for any and all gracious and merciful acts. Any act of mercy, though taking into account that a wrong was done, goes beyond an “eye for an eye” justice. So, the answer in terms of heaven is that it’s both/and. All humans are made for beatitude–it’s in their very natures, as divine image-bearers. And yet, our obtaining heaven requires God’s grace, mercy and love. Although we are made for it, we cannot earn it. It was Christ, not us, that bridged the gap, right?
There, just as a subtle hint, Aquinas defines why your argument about the injustice of infinite condemnation fails
It wasn’t a jab. It’s merely to state that I’ve read the relevant portions of the ST on this matter when I got really interested in it a couple of years ago. If you want to bring up some argument of his specifically, feel free.
So, your claim is that God’s mercy exists, but not His justice .
Since there is no equality in heaven, as Christ made plain on several occasions, there is all the reason in the world to believe that we will “reap what we sow.” The first will be last, and the last first.

And no, the claim is that a neverending state of torment and suffering (Hell) is a gross injustice. It’s cruel and unusual. It’s repugnant to anyone’s sense of justice. And you would not even bother to try to defend such a problematic teaching unless you were already committed (a priori) to the teaching of an unending Hell being the “revealed truth” of God, just as Aquinas was. As I’ve said many times over, no one arrives at the doctrine of the Augustinian Hell by deeply contemplating (1) the nature of God (including the sacrifice of Christ), (2) the nature of humanity (including our wills) or (3) the nature of justice. St Augustine’s Hell runs far afoul of all three of those categories.
 
Last edited:
the priest had a go at me for confessing the same sin time and time again
Wow, I have to confess (ba-dum-chee) that that is odd. I’ve pretty much only encountered mercy and kindness in the confessional. I’m here in America–not sure where you are, and not sure whether that would have any impact. Really sorry to hear about this experience! I thought the message of confession was, basically, although the requirements of the church are high, the requirements of penance are merciful. That is, they do not equal the severity of the sin. Anyway, sorry to hear that @oliver109
 
Thanks for your sympathies I am in England btw, I gather that the priest seemed a bit freaked out that there are some people who do actually struggle with sin more than others, I remember committing a few mortal sins one day literally two days after I went to confession and then two days later I went to confession and told the priest that it had been 4 days since my last Confession, he told me that other people who confessed to him did not fall back into the same mortal sins as quickly as I did.
 
Last edited:
So when a mortal sinner rejects grace, why does God allow them to live instead of dying straight after committing a mortal sin, why does he let them live with a chance of being able to ask for forgiveness?
After baptism, each mortal sin is a rejection, but the time allotted for repentance is the entire lifetime. That is why final impenitence is about the last moment not earlier.
 
The fact that my biology
Your friends are not biology, nor is the influence of your parents, your professors, your bosses, Catholic Answers, your socio-economic status, the principalities and powers that war against you, the political parties in your country, and the Romans 7 conflict within you yourself–not biological. And yet, all of these things influence you enormously throughout the course of your life. This is undeniable. I understand your reductive tendency here (to reduce all the influences I’ve pointed out to the realm of biology). But, in all the instances of biology and non-biology, we are still pointing out influences on you. You want to defend this existentialist idea of “absolute freedom,” the tabula rasa kind. I understand what you’re doing. But, you’re simply downplaying the roles that all of the above play on your judgment and your knowledge. You’re probably also downplaying the influence of the Fall on your ability to apprehend truth too. Whatever freedom you have is limited and conditioned by all of the above and much else besides, the majority of which is non-biological. However, even in the case of biology, we are still seeing examples of ways in which God imposed these things on you and in no way consulted your freedom of choice. Your freedom was entirely irrelevant to all of these things.
Ding ding ding! Give that man a kewpie doll!

You’ve got it! That is precisely the criteria for which a grave sin is not a mortal sin!
If that is all you gathered from my paragraph, then this may be a good place to wrap up our discussion. Peace be with you Gorgias.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top