No. Again: not the greatest good , but an inviolable gift .
Granting me the “gift” of allowing me the “freedom” to end in a state of suffering and torment indefinitely into the future is hardly any gift at all. As I said earlier, with a god like that, who needs enemies?
“Duration” is the red herring in this argument.
Did you happen to notice the title for this thread? A “forever” Hell is precisely what is being discussed. Severity and duration could not be any more relevant in matters of justice.
Fine. Where’s the justice in eternal bliss in return for finite love ? Either both heaven and hell are disproportionate, or both are just. Which is it?
Unlike you perhaps, I freely accept that God’s grace extends to all and is quite
unmerited. So, his grace and mercy go beyond justice. Actually, this is true for any and all gracious and merciful acts. Any act of mercy, though taking into account that a wrong was done, goes beyond an “eye for an eye” justice. So, the answer in terms of heaven is that it’s both/and. All humans are made for beatitude–it’s in their very natures, as divine image-bearers. And yet, our obtaining heaven requires God’s grace, mercy and love. Although we are made for it, we cannot earn it. It was Christ, not us, that bridged the gap, right?
There, just as a subtle hint, Aquinas defines why your argument about the injustice of infinite condemnation fails
It wasn’t a jab. It’s merely to state that I’ve read the relevant portions of the ST on this matter when I got really interested in it a couple of years ago. If you want to bring up some argument of his specifically, feel free.
So, your claim is that God’s mercy exists, but not His justice .
Since there is no equality in heaven, as Christ made plain on several occasions, there is all the reason in the world to believe that we will “reap what we sow.” The first will be last, and the last first.
And no, the claim is that a
neverending state of torment and suffering (Hell) is a gross
injustice. It’s cruel and unusual. It’s repugnant to anyone’s sense of justice. And you would not even bother to try to defend such a problematic teaching unless you were already committed (
a priori) to the teaching of an unending Hell being the “revealed truth” of God, just as Aquinas was. As I’ve said many times over, no one arrives at the doctrine of the Augustinian Hell by deeply contemplating (1) the nature of God (including the sacrifice of Christ), (2) the nature of humanity (including our wills) or (3) the nature of justice. St Augustine’s Hell runs far afoul of all three of those categories.