Yet Another Study Confirms Gay Life Expectancy 20 Years Shorter

  • Thread starter Thread starter buffalo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Brad:
It is based on their stances on various issues. It has nothing to do with Cameron himself.
Hi Brad!

Which conflicting issues?
 
40.png
ChrisR246:
To go off on a different tangent, are the insurance companies going to start charging higher premiums for homosexuals? :rolleyes: Smokers pay a higher premium, if they can get insurance, the overweight pay higher premiums…
Yeah, they should be in the risk pool like anyone else who chooses a high risk lifestyle.
 
40.png
ChrisR246:
To go off on a different tangent, are the insurance companies going to start charging higher premiums for homosexuals? :rolleyes: Smokers pay a higher premium, if they can get insurance, the overweight pay higher premiums…
Hi ChrisR246!

Smokers and the obese take a significant amount of time to develop the diseases they are subject to. The onset of the STDs normally contracted by a homosexual are lightning quick, and not likely to give the insurance company much time to accumulate payments before they must make payments on their extremely expensive therapies. Strictly speaking, they would not be insurable at all.
 
Other Eric:
Hi ChrisR246!

Smokers and the obese take a significant amount of time to develop the diseases they are subject to. The onset of the STDs normally contracted by a homosexual are lightning quick, and not likely to give the insurance company much time to accumulate payments before they must make payments on their extremely expensive therapies. Strictly speaking, they would not be insurable at all.
See, they need the current PC climate to advance their agenda, an agenda that will have the rest of us paying for the consequences of their lifestyle. That is why the agenda has to be shutdown right now, before Congress makes a law forcing the insurance companies to cover them.
 
Other Eric:
Hi fix!

Cameron argues that homosexuality is a condition that is freely and willfully chosen. That decision, and the resulting temptations that flow from it, are therefore sinful. In order to be released from the sin, the individual must make the same choice for a heterosexual orientation at which point the temptations would cease. The individual therefore continues to make a sinful choice as long as he is subject to the temptation, even if he never acts upon it.
Why is this theory bad? Many may choose homosexual conduct and lead a “gay” lifestyle. I cannot see this theory as incompatible with Catholic teaching? Not all passions are ordered toward the good. Some may have passions that lead them to want to choose “gay” conduct.
 
40.png
buffalo:
The study, entitled “Gay obituaries closely track officially reported deaths from AIDS”, has been published in Psychological Reports
“Gay obituaries”? The mind boggles.

I am not a scientist, but I do not think proper scientists base their conclusions on what they read in the mainstream media.
 
40.png
fix:
Why is this theory bad? Many may choose homosexual conduct and lead a “gay” lifestyle. I cannot see this theory as incompatible with Catholic teaching? Not all passions are ordered toward the good. Some may have passions that lead them to want to choose “gay” conduct.
Hi fix!

This theory is bad because it expressly contradicts the Church’s teaching that homosexuality, separate from the sexual acts, is without sin. Homosexuality is now a condition that is freely and willfully chosen with full knowledge and gravely immoral. All the conditions infallibly set by the Magisterium for a mortal sin are thus met and the condition therefore becomes a sin. To have even a fleeting homosexual temptation is a sin because the conditions under which one would be subject to the temptation are in all cases chosen.

Therefore, salvation is not available to those who have a homosexual temptation. They must choose to be rid of it in the same way they *choose *to be subject to it. Not to make this choice and to persist in the temptation is obstinacy in sin which the Church defines as a sin against the Holy Spirit.
 
Other Eric:
Hi fix!

This theory is bad because it expressly contradicts the Church’s teaching that homosexuality, separate from the sexual acts, is without sin. Homosexuality is now a condition that is freely and willfully chosen with full knowledge and gravely immoral. All the conditions infallibly set by the Magisterium for a mortal sin are thus met and the condition therefore becomes a sin. To have even a fleeting homosexual temptation is a sin because the conditions under which one would be subject to the temptation are in all cases chosen.

Therefore, salvation is not available to those who have a homosexual temptation. They must choose to be rid of it in the same way they *choose *to be subject to it. Not to make this choice and to persist in the temptation is obstinacy in sin which the Church defines as a sin against the Holy Spirit.
You concluded all that from Cameron’s words?
 
Other Eric:
Hi fix!

Cameron argues that homosexuality is a condition that is freely and willfully chosen. That decision, and the resulting temptations that flow from it, are therefore sinful. In order to be released from the sin, the individual must make the same choice for a heterosexual orientation at which point the temptations would cease. The individual therefore continues to make a sinful choice as long as he is subject to the temptation, even if he never acts upon it.
Eric,
How does this work for you?

Homosexuality is a condition that is freely and willfully chosen but a person who has homosexual tendencies (or urges) is not a homosexual. A homosexual is one who indulges those tendencies (or urges).

Just as a person who has thought of theft is not a theive, who has thought of murder, is not a murder, who has thought of suicide, is not dead, who has thought of any number of sins yet is not guilty of any of them.
 
40.png
ByzCath:
Eric,
How does this work for you?

Homosexuality is a condition that is freely and willfully chosen but a person who has homosexual tendencies (or urges) is not a homosexual. A homosexual is one who indulges those tendencies (or urges).

Just as a person who has thought of theft is not a theive, who has thought of murder, is not a murder, who has thought of suicide, is not dead, who has thought of any number of sins yet is not guilty of any of them.
Hi ByzCath!

I have a number of problems with this. If a man who experiences same-sex attractions is only a homosexual if he acts upon it, what is he if he doesn’t? Is his sexuality somehow less disordered? Does he cease to have the mental disorder that homosexuality is argued to be? Is an active homosexual only a homosexual at the point when he engages in the illicit sexual activity and something else when he is occupied with some other activity?

For Dr. Cameron, "homosexuality is about more than just sex – it is about rebelling against and trying to corrupt society, even as heterosexuality is about, for the most part, having and raising children. Homosexuality is also about coloring the world with SEX, regardless of the consequences. Its most prominent attitude is selfishness – getting what’s mine, what I deserve; getting back at all those who have hurt me, etc."
 
Other Eric:
Hi ByzCath!

I have a number of problems with this. If a man who experiences same-sex attractions is only a homosexual if he acts upon it, what is he if he doesn’t? Is his sexuality somehow less disordered? Does he cease to have the mental disorder that homosexuality is argued to be? Is an active homosexual only a homosexual at the point when he engages in the illicit sexual activity and something else when he is occupied with some other activity?

Seems you then have issues with what the Church teaches on this matter.

I stand with the Church.

I think your problem is that you are trying to link together two things that do not necessarily fit together. The opinions of a doctor of psychology (who we do not even know is Catholic) and the Catholic Church which is dealing with spirituality and not psychology.

You also seem to want to define a man solely based on his sexuality.

So I guess you think everyone is denied salvation becuase we all are tempted.
 
I look at it this way. If I commit adultery, that is mortal sin and unless I repent and change my ways I stand a good chance of winding up in hell.

Disregarding the fact that a homosexual is gay, they are still having sex without being married to their sexual partner. Homosexuals can also never be married to other homosexuals in the eyes of God so unless they choose to abstain from homosexual sex altogether they will be committing sin, just as if a straight person decided to never marry but still have sex throughout their entire life without ever repenting.
 
40.png
ByzCath:
Seems you then have issues with what the Church teaches on this matter.

I stand with the Church.

I think your problem is that you are trying to link together two things that do not necessarily fit together. The opinions of a doctor of psychology (who we do not even know is Catholic) and the Catholic Church which is dealing with spirituality and not psychology.

You also seem to want to define a man solely based on his sexuality.

So I guess you think everyone is denied salvation becuase we all are tempted.
Hi ByzCath!

All I am doing is referring to the Church’s own criteria for defining a mortal sin, and applying the conclusions of Dr. Cameron to it. Dr. Cameron cannot be too far off the mark. In addition to having his research be uncritically accepted by faithful Catholics, it is cited in the tracts against homosexuality on catholic.com. For a sin to be mortal it must:


  1. *]be objectively evil,
    *]be committed with full knowledge of the evil,
    *]and be freely and willfully chosen

    If the condition of homosexuality meets all three of these conditions, then it is a mortal sin unless you mean to make a special exception in the case of a homosexual. Further, this has nothing to do with defining a man by his sexuality.
 
FWIW in this country the vast majority of AIDS is still transmitted through homosexual activity. The next group is IV drug users and while they may be straight, once again it’s a lifestyle disease, not something like MS that is simply bad luck of the draw.

Homosexuals die early not simply because of HIV. In addition their rates of mental illness, drug use and suicide are higher. They may engage in other risky behavior as well.

The blood supply has been cleaned up and with proper procedures women are less likely to pass on HIV to their babies. So it’s still a result of some kind of risky behavior.

Lisa N
 
Gay men also have a shorter life expectancy because of an extremely high risk for rectal and colon cancers.
 
Two questions for Other Eric–

Is a man with same sex attraction a homosexual if he, say, masturbates while thinking of another man or looking at pornography or something, or only if he engages in a sexual act with another man?

I know that in Rome they’ve been working on some documents about gay priests and that gay men should not be allowed to become priests, but should men with SSA who don’t act on those feelings enter the priesthood?
 
40.png
seeker63:
Two questions for Other Eric–

Is a man with same sex attraction a homosexual if he, say, masturbates while thinking of another man or looking at pornography or something, or only if he engages in a sexual act with another man?

I know that in Rome they’ve been working on some documents about gay priests and that gay men should not be allowed to become priests, but should men with SSA who don’t act on those feelings enter the priesthood?
Hi seeker63!

I think one does need to be careful when discussing the nature of homosexuality. The word “homosexual” does have the unfortunate effect defining a man entirely in terms of his sexual outlook. Though I have used it many rimes on this thread, I do so merely as shorthand for the phrase “person with same-sex attractions.” I think it would be safe to say that a man engaged in the activity you describe definitely suffers from homosexuality or same-sex attraction.

As for the issue of a person having same-sex attractions entering into the priesthood, my suspicion is that the forthcoming paper from the Vatican will deny the admission of any such person into Holy Orders. The reasons why have been discussed ad nauseum on these forums.
 
Other Eric:
Hi fix!

Cameron’s words and Church teaching. Yes.
Well, your conclusions do not make any sense. From what you have posted Cameron is saying many people choose to be homosexual. That is probably true in many cases. That does not mean they are denied salvation, unless they do not repent.
 
40.png
fix:
Well, your conclusions do not make any sense. From what you have posted Cameron is saying many people choose to be homosexual. That is probably true in many cases. That does not mean they are denied salvation, unless they do not repent.
Hi fix!

Cameron is not saying that homosexuality is chosen in most cases. He’s saying that the very nature of homosexuality requires it to be definitively chosen in every case. He’s saying that this fact invalidates NARTH’s psychological model.
The corollary to this position is that homosexuals, as a group, are responsible for whatever sexual temptations they face as a result of their conscious, selfish decision to be a homosexual. The only way out is to make the conscious decision not to be a homosexual and it is a choice that can be made even without the aid of psychology.
So the decision to be subject to a homosexual temptation is completely within a man’s control as far as Dr. Cameron is concerned. A decision to remain in this state is a decision to choose a “tendency ordered toward an intrinsic moral evil” and therefore must be sinful. In sum: Only if you are straight are you saved if one is going to uncritically accept the twisted positions of Dr. Cameron.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top