F
āEnjoyingā is not exactly the word!Hi guys.
Yaāll seem to be enjoying your debate, which I am assuming is cordial since I have had no complaints about it, and rarely even look at it.
You are coming to that magic 1000 mark though. When you get there, feel free to start another thread.
Iāll ignore that one too.![]()
Iām not really into yoga (yet) as I find Pilates is what works for me so you canāt say I have a bias.However, Michael Mayo and others have articulated well why yoga body work is not against Catholic teaching but you failed to show when or where the Church teaching says itās wrong.(ā¦)
Your opinion was formed by your desire to practice - proved, by the fact that you are arguing as a Yoga dāooer, and thus unable to remain objective.
Just want to say thanks for all your (name removed by moderator)ut! And as the guests, you go for it!http://www.christianspracticingyoga.com/
Its now a race against time to see who will get the last word on this thread, and thus close the debate on yoga once and for all![]()
Yep, I very much like the idea of demolishing someoneās arguments on the grounds that they know too much of what they are talking about.Your posts point to you being disingenous in this matter. Because, you say you have no interest in the philosophical side of Yoga, and that practicing Yoga does not lead those who do Yoga further into Hinduism, when you, yourself, already know heaps about all these different Yoga philosophies, which in itself, is evidence of your already firmly-planted stance on the subject. IOW, you have a biased opinion formed by your appetite.
This is the difference. You are practicing Yoga and have researched deeper into Yoga therefore making your position on the matter of Yoga untrustworthily bias in favour of it.
Nice try! Not quite.Yep, I very much like the idea of demolishing someoneās arguments on the grounds that they know too much of what they are talking about.
praisemoves.com**
Code:url]http://www.wholyfit.com/**
If you ādisentangleā the philosophy from the exercises then it is not yoga,it is stretching. Why call it yoga if it is not?I have been saying all these many pages is that the exercises or positions CAN be disentangled, separated, 'cut off from" from the philosophy but you cannot seem to hear me. And now you say the same thing.![]()
Because yoga movement isnāt just stretching. Yoga can tone and strengthen (the latter minimully) muscles. The postures, when held, can relieve pain. I donāt do the kind of yoga that everyone is talking about but I use one variation called mudras.If you ādisentangleā the philosophy from the exercises then it is not yoga,it is stretching. Why call it yoga if it is not?
I am wondering if this thread will reach 1000 posts with no general consensus of how yoga differs from stretching exercises.
That does not seem possible for him.Friardchips,
If you would just say that you personally are not comfortable with anything having to do with a religion other than Catholicism, I would happily accept that. You can give the various reasons for your personal belief, some of which are indeed backed up by individual members of the Church (certain clergy and* Women of Grace*, for example).
It is when you try to make blanket statements or draw conclusions as though it is the official teaching of the Church which we all must follow - **when in fact it is not **- this is when I must take issue with some of the things you post here.
I appreciate that you mean well, but you occasionally overstep your authority where our relationship with other religions (in general) and Christians practicing yoga (specifically) are concerned. Is it possible for you to agree that your position is one,** but not the only one**, allowed by the Church?
Because the stretches are specific, categorized and well known in yoga terminology.If you ādisentangleā the philosophy from the exercises then it is not yoga,it is stretching. Why call it yoga if it is not?
True. Good point. I did use the wrong phrasing there.I have been saying all these many pages is that the exercises or positions CAN be disentangled, separated, 'cut off from" from the philosophy but you cannot seem to hear me. And now you say the same thing.![]()
Hi guys.
Yaāll seem to be enjoying your debate, which I am assuming is cordial since I have had no complaints about it, and rarely even look at it.
You are coming to that magic 1000 mark though. When you get there, feel free to start another thread.
Iāll ignore that one too.![]()
I think Iāve given the idea that I donāt understand what you mean.Because the stretches are specific, categorized and well known in yoga terminology.
There is consensus on these terms. If one hears a term like āBÄlÄsanaā there is no doubt about what is being talked about.
It is only a name. Not a philosophy.
It is possible, Agnes-Therese. Iām not an inflexible person.That does not seem possible for him.
Forget yoga if you canāt get past it.True. Good point. I did use the wrong phrasing there.Not sure about it being cut exactly but some positions might correspond. Thank you for pointing out the mistake.
Off-topic, have you looked at any of those particular links? Maybe, seeing as you have some experience of doing exercise and trying to make it appropriate for pre-prayer relaxation, you might be in a position to see if any of the links do actually help the individual to prepare, as a viable alternative, for those who donāt feel comfortable doing Yoga?
Yes,but as you said the name yoga is used because it is a specific category and progression of stretches. How these stretches unite one with God is beyond me though.Forget yoga if you canāt get past it.
Just stretch as it feels best and hold for a few seconds ( or minutes).
Touch your toes, straighten your back, take some deep breaths, etc.
Nevermind that all that has a name.
Call it athletic stretching, therapeutic stretching, or anything you like.
Itās only a name change.