You probably don't really believe in Prayer

  • Thread starter Thread starter Imagine23
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, you guys both are missing it. I can repeat myself all day long. My point is that with respect to the petition aspect of prayer, Christians do not really believe that such petitions in and of themselves, are enough to accomplish what they are praying for.

I’ve used the medical example with Christian Science as an example. Christian Scientists believe (against all evidence to the contrary) that the petition aspect of prayer is so powerful and effective, that they can forgo actual modern medicine in favor of asking god.

The faith of Christians is not that strong.

It’s easy to say you believe this and that but actions speak louder than words.
Who has stronger faith: the one who the one who trusts in following the path that God has laid out for us, using all of the tools He has give us?

Or is it the one who says “this looks like humans have a hand in this, so it must not be of God and therefore I will reject it?” How arrogant is that, to deny that God would work through our fellow man?

Are we not called to cooperate in our salvation? Or is it instead sufficient to say “I believe” and then sit on our hands?

Blessed are the ones who looked at their brothers in the world and saw Christ in their fellow man and acted on it. And cursed are the ones who looked at their brothers in the world and said, “Since this is not Christ but only something human I will do nothing.” Matthew 25:34-45

By the way, have you ever looked at the “cure rate” for Christian Scientists who trust solely in prayer and shun physicians? It’s dismal. That alone argues definitively against your proposition.
 
Who has stronger faith: the one who the one who trusts in following the path that God has laid out for us, using all of the tools He has give us?

Or is it the one who says “this looks like humans have a hand in this, so it must not be of God and therefore I will reject it?” How arrogant is that, to deny that God would work through our fellow man?

Are we not called to cooperate in our salvation? Or is it instead sufficient to say “I believe” and then sit on our hands?

Blessed are the ones who looked at their brothers in the world and saw Christ in their fellow man and acted on it. And cursed are the ones who looked at their brothers in the world and said, “Since this is not Christ but only something human I will do nothing.” Matthew 25:34-45

By the way, have you ever looked at the “cure rate” for Christian Scientists who trust solely in prayer and shun physicians? It’s dismal. That alone argues definitively against your proposition.
That’s funny. I’m not arguing that what Christian Scientists believe about prayer is true. I think it’s ridiculous. Of course it doesn’t work. Prayer does not work. It’s as effective as talking to your rose garden.

Answer to who has stronger faith? The Christian Scientists.
 
That’s funny. I’m not arguing that what Christian Scientists believe about prayer is true. I think it’s ridiculous. Of course it doesn’t work. Prayer does not work. It’s as effective as talking to your rose garden.

Answer to who has stronger faith? The Christian Scientists.
You can’t compare the strength of a Christian Scientist’s faith, and a Catholic’s faith regarding prayer as they believe prayer to be different concepts.

The Christian Scientist believes prayer is asking God for what they want, and expecting it to happen.

The Catholic believes prayer to be a dialogue between God that tells Him how much we love Him, what our request is, but only for him to do it if it His will. We also believe God gave us one another to help out with things such as medicine and healing. We believe it is God’s will to place us in the hands of a highly competent surgeon etc. Obviously the Christian Scientists don’t believe this about our God.

Therefore Imagine123, even though you don’t believe in prayer in general, it is pointless to compare the strengths of these 2 religions faiths based on the act of petitions through prayers as both religions believe in different meanings of it.
 
I’m not imagining anything. Christian Scientists in fact pray instead of seeking medical treatment. I personally knew one who did so and died as a result.
Your acquaintance who died must not have had True Faith; the “cure” didn’t work.

Mt 17:14-20 And when they came to the crowd, a man came up to him and kneeling before him said, “Lord, have mercy on my son, for he is an epileptic and he suffers terribly; for often he falls into the fire, and often into the water. And I brought him to your disciples, and they could not heal him.” And Jesus answered, “O faithless and perverse generation, how long am I to be with you? How long am I to bear with you? Bring him here to me.” And Jesus rebuked him, and the demon came out of him, and the boy was cured instantly. Then the disciples came to Jesus privately and said, “Why could we not cast it out?” He said to them, “Because of your little faith. For truly, I say to you, if you have faith as a grain of mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move; and nothing will be impossible to you.”
I don’t know if I qualify as an ex-Catholic. I was baptized and did communion but I was a baby and a kid when those events happened, not really qualified to make the decision to accept one brand of mythology over another.
You left the Church when you grew up and now define it as “one brand of mythology.” Yep, you’re an ex-Catholic. You may come home in the future, but for now you’re ex-Catholic.
I must remind you, you are also an atheist with respect to thousands of God
Atheist: from Gk. atheos “to deny the gods, godless,” from a- “without” + theos “a god”

I am a theist. I have a God. I reject false notions of non-existent gods.
 
Yeah, you guys both are missing it. I can repeat myself all day long. My point is that with respect to the petition aspect of prayer, Christians do not really believe that such petitions in and of themselves, are enough to accomplish what they are praying for.
If that’s the case, then you and the Catholic Church are in agreement. Petitions “in and of themselves” are ineffective in ANY instance, as they require action on the part of the one being petitioned.

So what is your point? If you knew that God being bound to answering every whim of human beings was NOT truly Christian doctrine then all you’ve done so far is expect people to defend a strawman version of Christianity that you came up with yourself.
 
Your acquaintance who died must not have had True Faith; the “cure” didn’t work.
That’s not necessarily it… it’s an oversimplistic explanation, and you’re assuming far too much. There are more factors that go into it, but I don’t have time to go into all of it right now.
 
That’s not necessarily it… it’s an oversimplistic explanation, and you’re assuming far too much. There are more factors that go into it, but I don’t have time to go into all of it right now.
Of course it’s oversimplistic. It was a sarcastic answer to an anti-Catholic slur.

The OP was suggesting that if Catholics really believed in prayer, with the enthisiasm that Christian Scientists believe, we wouldn’t think we needed doctors.

According to Wikipedia, Christian Scientists believe that sickness is the result of either fear, ignorance, or sin, and that when the erroneous belief is corrected, the sickness will disappear.

The OP gave as an example a Christian Scientist who was a true believer in the power of prayer but, guess what, that person’s prayer was as effective as spitting in the wind. Then the OP insisted that all prayer was worthless, but continued to play bait-the-Catholics.

That’s why my response was worded that way. You don’t need to go into “other factors.”
 
I’m not imagining anything. Christian Scientists in fact pray instead of seeking medical treatment. I personally knew one who did so and died as a result.

I don’t know if I qualify as an ex-Catholic. I was baptized and did communion but I was a baby and a kid when those events happened, not really qualified to make the decision to accept one brand of mythology over another.

I must remind you, you are also an atheist with respect to thousands of God.
It looks like you may have confused me with Nan. Please tell me first if you are a Christian scientist. Second, I would appreciate it if you would reply to my post here:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=1881036&postcount=92

which you seem to have ignored; or maybe you have missed. These additional posts provide further clarification about what I am asking:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=1881319&postcount=97
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=1881420&postcount=100
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=1882322&postcount=108

zerinus
 
The OP was suggesting that if Catholics really believed in prayer, with the enthisiasm that Christian Scientists believe, we wouldn’t think we needed doctors."
Nan! I’m so proud of you! You got it!
 
If that’s the case, then you and the Catholic Church are in agreement. Petitions “in and of themselves” are ineffective in ANY instance, as they require action on the part of the one being petitioned.

So what is your point? If you knew that God being bound to answering every whim of human beings was NOT truly Christian doctrine then all you’ve done so far is expect people to defend a strawman version of Christianity that you came up with yourself.
So asking God to do things for you is incredibly ineffective, as we all acknowledge, and quite a waste of time.
 
It is called faith, not rationalism, and doesn’t need proof
Good point. If you were rationalizing something, you’d be using reason, which theists do not rely on.

The best definition I’d have for Faith in the Catholic concept I guess would be a blind adherence to ancient doctrine which often defies common sense and logic. Is that a fair definition?
 
That’s your claim… jumping to conclusions from what I just said.
Everyone on this board has confirmed how ineffective it is. Uncomfortable with facing the issue of the ineffectiveness of petition prayer, posters quickly switched to offering explanations of “Oh, prayer is not just to receive things, it’s also for talking to God, etc. etc.”
 
Everyone on this board has confirmed how ineffective it is. Uncomfortable with facing the issue of the ineffectiveness of petition prayer, posters quickly switched to offering explanations of “Oh, prayer is not just to receive things, it’s also for talking to God, etc. etc.”
You aren’t even listening. Forget your red herring of what you project on other posters’ responses and reply to me directly for once… I never said it was ineffective, and neither did anyone else.

Again, your faulty logic hinges on this strawman of Christian belief: that God must do whatever He’s told. You can’t even argue based on real Christian beliefs, but I’ll give you this… If the only way you see talking to God to be “effective” is to be able to selfishly manipulate Him into doing whatever you want (as you and all other atheists seem to) then yes it WOULD be ineffective… then again, so would “praying” to anyone else for that matter.

Yes, I said “pray” to other people… I advise you look it up before you give me the typical ignorant response.
 
You aren’t even listening. Forget your red herring of what you project on other posters’ responses and reply to me directly for once… I never said it was ineffective, and neither did anyone else.

Again, your faulty logic hinges on this strawman of Christian belief: that God must do whatever He’s told. You can’t even argue based on real Christian beliefs, but I’ll give you this… If the only way you see talking to God to be “effective” is to be able to selfishly manipulate Him into doing whatever you want (as you and all other atheists seem to) then yes it WOULD be ineffective… then again, so would “praying” to anyone else for that matter.

Yes, I said “pray” to other people… I advise you look it up before you give me the typical ignorant response.
Very well said exoflare. I’ve been reading Imagine23’s responses vicariously through you and others in this thread quoting him.

Imagine23 is apparently mistaking prayer with something akin to rubbing Aladin’s lamp. He doesn’t even seem to recognize how the adversary tempting our Lord three times in the wilderness actually reflects the arabic concept of the jinn offering three wishes either.

Our Lord knew exactly how the adversay works-- in offering to “grant his wishes”, the adversary would have effectively taken hold of the Son of God if our Lord had allowed the adversary to fullfill what he was asking the Lord to receive.

The adversary is subtle. Very subtle. The most subtle being in the garden-- so subtle that many no longer believe that he even exists.

What many people do not realize is that when the adversary stands before people and states “Your wish is my desire”, he is not intending to grant the desired wishes of the people he stands against. In other words, the wishes of the person being tempted are not what the adversary desires to grant

Instead, in total opposition to how he presents himself, the adversary is looking to implant his own desires within the person he is offering his power to. In other words, the adversary is quite literally looking to implant his own desires into the person being offered a chance to fulfill these wishes. More specifically, the person’s wishes are the adversary’s desires manifesting within them-- not vice versa.

The Lord, however, works in the complete opposition to this devilish wishful thinking. The Lord is most sublime and the prayers that people pray, if they are truly inspired of the Holy Spirit, are the very subliminal desires within which the Lord himself has manifested within those who are truly praying as the Spirit moves them to do so. More specifically, the person’s prayers are the Lord’s desires manifesting within them-- not vice versa.

Ironically, Imagine23’s understanding of prayer actually more accurately reflects the devil’s ability to tempt others than it does the true prayers from Christians talking with God.

Nonetheless. as Jesus said, not my will be done but thy will be done-- and those moving by the Spirit, such as you and I, do understand this. Imagine23, however, since he is not moving by the Spirit, does not understand this distinction between the subtle temptations of the adversary and the subliminal motions of the Spirit.

It requires faith, the vision of the Spirit, to distinguish between the spirits-- and Imagine23 does not have the faith to see this. Nor does he really seem to care to understand this distinction more clearly either. 😦
 
Ironically, Imagine23’s understanding of prayer actually more accurately reflects the devil’s ability to tempt others than it does the true prayers from Christians talking with God.
:clapping:

Bravo, sir! If we believed in the God that Imagine23 thinks we do, He’d be a pretty wimpy God indeed…running around doing whatever anybody told Him to do…

:rolleyes:
 
I am puzzled. :confused: Why are you so afraid to answer my simple question? :rolleyes:

zerinus
Okay, since you don’t seem to want to answer my question, I have looked it up on the Internet, and here is what I found abut the Christian Science definition of prayer:

Prayer

Christian Science teaches that prayer is a spiritualization of thought or an understanding of God and the nature of the underlying spiritual creation. The world as it appears to the senses is regarded as a distorted version of the world of spiritual ideas: the latter is the only true reality. Prayer can heal the distortion, bringing spiritual reality (the “Kingdom of Heaven” in Biblical terms) into clearer focus in the human scene (not changing the spiritual creation but giving a clearer view of it). The result is healing. (According to Christian Science there are not two creations, a spiritual and a material one, but only a spiritual creation which is incorrectly perceived as material.)

Christian Scientists believe that prayer works though love, and that this is the way Christ Jesus healed. Their aim is to reinstate the element of healing which, they believe, was lost with early Christianity. They cite such Bible texts as Mark 11: 22-24 and Mark 16: 17-18 in support of their contention that Christian faith demands demonstration in healing.

An important point in Christian Science is that the healing of sin is more important than the healing of physical disease, and that prayer and the moral regeneration of one’s life go hand-in-hand. (Christian Science teaches that while disease may be a result of sin or wrong-doing it is not necessarily so—it may equally be the result of fear, or ignorance of God’s power and goodness.) The chapter on “Prayer” in the Christian Science textbook, Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures by Mary Baker Eddy, gives a full account of healing through prayer, while the testimonies at the end of the book are written by people who believe they have been healed through spiritual understanding. Christian Scientists claim no monopoly on the application of God’s healing power through prayer, and welcome it wherever it occurs. (Source Wikipedia).

This is a fundamentally different definition of prayer from the Catholic (and I should say any other Christian definition) of prayer. The question here is not who “believes more” in the virtue of prayer than whom. It is a question of whose idea of prayer is correct and whose idea is false. The two ideas are so fundamentally different that they can’t both be right. One of them has to be wrong. Perhaps the Catholics can give us their (official) definition of prayer if there is one, so we can compare the two.

zerinus
 
I have not read the whole thread yet, so forgive me if this has been posted.

Reading the first page of the thread has reminded me of this “joke”, I’ve heard once:
It had been raining for days and days, and a terrible flood had come over the land. The waters rose so high that one man was forced to climb onto the roof of his house.
As the waters rose higher and higher, a man in a rowboat appeared, and told him to get in. “No,” replied the man on the roof. “I have faith in the Lord; the Lord will save me.” So the man in the rowboat went away. The man on the roof prayed for God to save him.
The waters rose higher and higher, and suddenly a speedboat appeared. “Climb in!” shouted a man in the boat. “No,” replied the man on the roof. “I have faith in the Lord; the Lord will save me.” So the man in the speedboat went away. The man on the roof prayed for God to save him.
The waters continued to rise. A helicopter appeared and over the loudspeaker, the pilot announced he would lower a rope to the man on the roof. “No,” replied the man on the roof. “I have faith in the Lord; the Lord will save me.” So the helicopter went away. The man on the roof prayed for God to save him.
The waters rose higher and higher, and eventually they rose so high that the man on the roof was washed away, and alas, the poor man drowned.
Upon arriving in heaven, the man marched straight over to God. “Heavenly Father,” he said, “I had faith in you, I prayed to you to save me, and yet you did nothing. Why?” God gave him a puzzled look, and replied “I sent you two boats and a helicopter, what more did you expect?”
Thanks,
God Bless
 
So asking God to do things for you is incredibly ineffective, as we all acknowledge, and quite a waste of time.
No more so than asking my earthly parents to do things for me. Because I’m not spoiled rotten and self-centred or self-obsessed I don’t expect that they will ALWAYS jump to obey my every whim, but yes, plenty of times they will help out. And so does God.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top