Huh? Of course the catholic church pulls out specific verses out of Scripture to develop theologies out of them. Look at how John 6 is used to support the eucharist or Matthew 16:13-19 to support the papacy. You can add I Corinthians 3 to support purgatory.
You are in error, ja4. However, you have been told this dozens of times previously to no avail. Yet, for the sake of the lurkers I will correct you again (and for the sake of my character development).
Catholic doctrine is not based on the Bible, but on the Teachings of Jesus through the Apostles. The deposit of faith given to the saints was whole and entire before a word of the New Testament was ever written. Although we see Catholic doctrine reflected in the NT, the NT is not the source of it, but Jesus. The Catholic faith is not "bible based’ but Jesus based. All of what Jesus taught was never intended to be in the Bible, and that is why we do not pull verses out of it to form doctrine.
We read the Bible in the light of what Christ taught, such as John 6. We understand what the passages mean based upon what the people taught that were present when Jesus taught them.
I didn’t ask that. I asked what the offical interpretation of John 10:27-29 is.
Trying to derail yet another thread, ja4?
What do you mean by Tradition? Is there a list of these Traditions somewhere?
Still pulling from your same old back of tricks? Have we not had this Tradition discussion to death? It is clear that this is a disingenuous question,and that you are not here to learn anything. Shall I post the statements you have made that proves this?
Code:
Has the Magestrium interpreted John 10:27-29?
Personally, I don’t think that you are interested in learning anything Catholic, but if you must persist in this trolling, at least open another thread.
How can you say OSAS is not supported by Scripture when the catholic church has never interpreted john 10:27-29 which is one of the primary scriptural supports for OSAS?
Because we read scripture as a whole, and don’t pull certain verses out of it upon which to build doctrine. When we read this passage in the light of all the others, an in the light of Apostlic teaching, we can see that OSAS is erroneous.
Code:
This does not mean that much. There are a number of catholic docrines that were unknown for centuries. Mary's assumption is one.
Another attempt at thread derailment?