1950 "The year of the assumption"

  • Thread starter Thread starter myfavoritmartin
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
estesbob said:
Per your personal interpertation. What qualifies you to interpert Scripture for the rest if us?
Click to expand...
Bob your imperfect decision as to what church to follow led you to the CC, how do they interpret this verse?
 
myfavoritmartin said:
We are told in scriptue that we do not need men to teach us.

1Jn 2:27 As for you, the anointing which you received from Him abides in you, and you have no need for anyone to teach you; but as His anointing teaches you about all things, and is true and is not a lie, and just as it has taught you, you abide in Him

Spoken from an Apostle …
Click to expand...
An apostle who was a man. Now what?
 
mercygate said:
But in Jn 16:13, Jesus did say he would send the Spirit to guide us “into all the truth.” If you are content with less than what our Lord has promised, well, I guess that’s your lookout. But it’s bad sportsmanship to claim that the Catholic faith is wrong because you choose not to embrace the fullness of Our Lord’s promise.
Click to expand...
Mercy here is your conference of bishops interpretation…
Declare to you the things that are coming: not a reference to new predictions about the future, but interpretation of what has already occurred or been said

So what’s your point?
 
myfavoritmartin said:
We are told in scriptue that we do not need men to teach us.

1Jn 2:27 As for you, the anointing which you received from Him abides in you, and you have no need for anyone to teach you; but as His anointing teaches you about all things, and is true and is not a lie, and just as it has taught you, you abide in Him

Spoken from an Apostle …
Click to expand...
To the Apostles:

Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, to the close of the age."

. . . from the Lord himself.

You have a bizarre way of reading Scripture. That’s why you think Catholic teaching is “unscriptural.” You look at Scripture in bits, not as One, integrated Word.
 
myfavoritmartin said:
Bob your imperfect decision as to what church to follow led you to the CC, how do they interpret this verse?
Click to expand...
I dont. I dont beleive Scripture is a puzzle book that each one of us has to decipher to determine what the Truth is.
 
deb1 said:
can you tell me which portion of what i wrote is incorrect?
Click to expand...
my question still stands. you claimed that peter waldo was a faith based christian. he obviously was not. so from what i wrote can you tell me where i am wrong? what exactly did i write that was incorrect about peter waldo?
 
deb1 said:
my question still stands. you claimed that peter waldo was a faith based christian. he obviously was not. so from what i wrote can you tell me where i am wrong? what exactly did i write that was incorrect about peter waldo?
Click to expand...
I didn’t say what you said was point blank wrong, I said go to a non-biased page. The CC branded him and his people heretics, what kind of spin will be painted…The waldensians are still around and in communion with the methodist church…What’s that tell you?
 
estesbob said:
Per your personal interpertation. What qualifies you to interpert Scripture for the rest if us?
Click to expand...
What qualified you to determine your church was the right church therefore following it’s interpretations… Bet you were a cradle catholic, like most on here.
 
VociMike said:
Every encounter I’ve ever had with Protestants who want me to investigate my faith further has led me to a stronger Catholic faith. It’s happening here too. .
Click to expand...
Good for you have you studied Papal primacy in the first 200 years or Galileo and the incorrect interpretation of scripture by the magisterium? Check um out GOOD reading!
 
myfavoritmartin said:
Mercy here is your conference of bishops interpretation…
Declare to you the things that are coming: not a reference to new predictions about the future, but interpretation of what has already occurred or been said

So what’s your point?
Click to expand...
I must be missing something from the USCCB Bible you linked to. What interpretation are you referring to? I see none attached to that verse.

Bear with me, I need to see the connections between the dots.
 
mercygate said:
That epistle is specifically addressed as a warning against false teachers who come with novel gnostic “teachings” – to be taught by the Church is to be taught by the Holy Spirit.
Click to expand...
Where o where do you see “to be taught by the church”???
It talks about being decieved period! Now whose making their own interpretation?
 
mercygate said:
I must be missing something from the USCCB Bible you linked to. What interpretation are you referring to? I see none attached to that verse.

Bear with me, I need to see the connections between the dots.
Click to expand...
I was talking about John 16:13 you quoted…
Sorry!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top