Syele << 1. the 242 # was from a different section of that study. the 33,000 number INCLUDED 2,800 Catholic denominations. How do you feel about me insisting on using Barretts study to accurately cite 2,800 Catholic denominaitons when only 242 of them are seperate only because of regaional issues? >>
What page number is the 2,800 Catholic denominations?
The 33,000 includes the 242 not 2,800 if you are referring to the “megablocs.” I need to check the source again as to what you are referring to? I am referring to the totals of the “megablocs” on pages 16-18, volume 1:
Independents (about 22000)
Protestants (about 9000)
“Marginals” (about 1600)
Orthodox (781)
Roman Catholics (242)
Anglicans (168)
Add these up, and you get the 33000+. There are not 2,800 Catholic denominations. The source maintains the 242 are really one Roman Catholic organization (volume 1, page 27, in the “Glossary” under definition for “Denomination”), and that they are separating denominations by country (volume 1, ibid). The “counting by country” thing is what the problem is if you want the “true” number of “unique” denominations worldwide. I’ve already admitted that.
Syele << 2. if your point is about unity and fragmentation of protestantism, how does citing a controversial study prove your point? >>
The study is not controversial to professional statisticians, since the people who compiled the book are professional statisticians themselves:
David B. Barrett, George T. Kurian, Todd M. Johnson. It is only “controversial” in here because some people throw the numbers around and don’t cite the exact source, page numbers, and precise context. But I do.

It is a standard work of statistics not only for Christianity, but for religions and religious movements worldwide (see volume 2 for all the non-Christian religions). From the Barrett article: "Such numbers are always debatable, but they’re the best available. ‘We don’t really have any rivals,’ Barrett says. ‘That’s the problem.’ "
Syele << 3. of those 2,800 Catholic denominations, why is it insignificant that they are divided by music style, style of dress etc. Yet significant when the protestant ones are divided that same way? >>
242, not 2800, if you mean the total 33000 number. All of the groups within the 242 are united to the Pope, unless I am mistaken. So organizationally and doctrinally, they are one. The Catholic or “Roman Catholic” groups within the 242 are listed as:
Armenian (Eastern-rite Catholic)
Bulgarian (Byzantine rite)
Byzantine-rite (jurisdiction for more than one ethnic group)
Chaldean (Eastern Syrian rite)
Coptic (Alexandrian rite)
Ethiopic (Alexandrian rite)
Greek (Byzantine rite)
Hungarian (Byzantine rite)
Italo-Albanian (Byzantine rite)
Jurisdiction for both Latin-rite and Eastern-rite Catholics
Latin-rite Catholic
Malankara (Syro-Antiochian, Eastern Syrian), Syro-Malankarese
Maronite (Syro-Antiochian, Western Syrian)
Melkite (Byzantine, Greek Catholic; Arabic-speaking)
plural Oriental (jurisdiction for several Eastern rites)
Romanian Byzantine rite
Russian (Byzantine rite)
Ruthenian (Byzantine rite)
Slovak (Byzantine rite)
Syro-Malabarese (Eastern Syrian)
Syrian, Syriac-speaking (Syro-Antiochian, West Syrian)
Ukrainian Byzantine rite
If you can give me a page number I can check the source again for your 2800. I am referring to the 2001, 2nd edition. Your main totals are on pages 16 to 18, volume 1 of
World Christian Encyclopedia.
Granted, some of the Protestant and “independent” divisions are brought about by minor issues. But division organizationally for whatever reason is still division. The challenge was to “NAME THEM” (i.e. the 33000 total Christian denominations, or at least 50 of them) –
I’ve named them. So has Gordon Conwell Seminary’s
"World Christian Database". All we Christians need to “live” with the true number, whatever it is.
http://www.bringyou.to/apologetics/DenomCartoon.png
Phil P