4-Year-Old Killed for Refusing to Call Mom's Lesbian Lover "Daddy"

[Jasny]

Libero: Come on folks -

This thread is silly, these people are child killers, it is not because of their orientation, but because they are fanatics, people who cannot control anger

.

I don’t think one can separate their orientation from their act in this case. ]

If a homosexual was killed because he said he was homosexual then there would be a uproar in the media and with the homosexual community, saying it was clearly because of the homosexual orientation.

But this case is because the child refused to recognise the homosexual life style of the women then they killed the child for this.

If the women never tried to force the un-natural situation because of orientation, then this wouldn’t have never happened.

It is the same as if I refused to recognise my daughters marriage to another women and she killed me for it.

 

[bones_IV]

Jasny:

.

I don’t think one can separate their orientation from their act in this case. ]

If a homosexual was killed because he said he was homosexual then there would be a uproar in the media and with the homosexual community, saying it was clearly because of the homosexual orientation.

But this case is because the child refused to recognise the homosexual life style of the women then they killed the child for this.

If the women never tried to force the un-natural situation because of orientation, then this wouldn’t have never happened.

It is the same as if I refused to recognise my daughters marriage to another women and she killed me for it.

:clapping:

 

[BlindSheep]

Didn’t someone say there was evidence of higher rates of child abuse by gay couples? Are there any statistics availiable on this?
It seems most likely to me that rather than their orientation either causing, or being unrelated to, this crime a third possibility is at play - that there is a psychological/neurological disorder which contributes both to their homosexuality and to this murder.

 

[ElJay]

cecelia:

Homosexuality is not selfless;self-giving; it’s selfish,sterile, and by its very nature homosexuality cannot participate in the creative act. Two people with same-sex attraction who engage in same-sex sexual activity cannot produce a child. Their act is not one of mutual self-giving but of mutual masturbation, if you will. All that to say, a homosexual “couple” by its very nature or anti-nature …

Homosexuals can’t help feeling the way they do (and i speak from experience). To be homosexual is not to make a decision to be selfish. It is a genetic trait and cannot be changed past a certain point in embryotic development. To be breif, the homosexuality gene is not a freak gene - its a number of genes present in members of the opposite sex expressed in a member of the gender it does not belong, making the person naturally attracted to men as women are or as naturally attracted to women as men are. This gene being present does not suppress the natural urge to raise young, however. So homosexual couples do not adopt simply to justify their relationship.

I will leave you with this: how many of you actually KNOW a homosexual?

 

[Libero]

Jasny:

.

I don’t think one can separate their orientation from their act in this case. ]

If a homosexual was killed because he said he was homosexual then there would be a uproar in the media and with the homosexual community, saying it was clearly because of the homosexual orientation.

But this case is because the child refused to recognise the homosexual life style of the women then they killed the child for this.

If the women never tried to force the un-natural situation because of orientation, then this wouldn’t have never happened.

It is the same as if I refused to recognise my daughters marriage to another women and she killed me for it.

But the child was not killed for refusing to call the lesbian ‘daddy’ - only LifeSite seems to have made that up - non of the other sites mention it at all. The child was killed after prolonged physical abuse, and if we were to pin it to one event, it seems that it is because the boy did not want to eat the dinner.

 

[adrift]

Libero:

But the child was not killed for refusing to call the lesbian ‘daddy’ - only LifeSite seems to have made that up - non of the other sites mention it at all. The child was killed after prolonged physical abuse, and if we were to pin it to one event, it seems that it is because the boy did not want to eat the dinner.

Hmmmm your statement that LifeSite made it up made me curious so I did a search only ONE site failed to mention that one of the reasons that the little boy was killed was that he would not call his mothers lesbian partner “daddy” . That site was,not surprisenly, a pro homosexual site which I believe you got your information from about his not eating. It was the only site I found that mentioned it.

 

[Libero]

adrift:

Hmmmm your statement that LifeSite made it up made me curious so I did a search only ONE site failed to mention that one of the reasons that the little boy was killed was that he would not call his mothers lesbian partner “daddy” . That site was,not surprisenly, a pro homosexual site which I believe you got your information from about his not eating. It was the only site I found that mentioned it.

Take a look at the sites I was linked in post No 37: I scoured them - I am nearly positive there is nothing about the ‘daddy’ idea - but then again I may be wrong…

 

[adrift]

Libero:

Take a look at the sites I was linked in post No 37: I scoured them - I am nearly positive there is nothing about the ‘daddy’ idea - but then again I may be wrong…

Those two links are essential the same thing. If you will note, the second link says that it is quoting from the first. Nothing is said in any of those links about the daddy idea however, look at more recent articles. IOL
I am not disagreeing with you. In fact I agree with you that this horrible deed IS not caused by the women being homosexual although it could be an underlying cause of her rage against the child but that gets into a judgment that we are not quallified or should make. However, what I take issue with you is that Lifesite made it up. It did not and I hope you will retract that position.

 

[Libero]

adrift:

Those two links are essential the same thing. If you will note, the second link says that it is quoting from the first. Nothing is said in any of those links about the daddy idea however, look at more recent articles. IOL
I am not disagreeing with you. In fact I agree with you that this horrible deed IS not caused by the women being homosexual although it could be an underlying cause of her rage against the child but that gets into a judgment that we are not quallified or should make. However, what I take issue with you is that Lifesite made it up. It did not and I hope you will retract that position.

Yup, I retract it - thanks for the link

 

[Traditional_Ang]

ElJay:

Homosexuals can’t help feeling the way they do (and i speak from experience). To be homosexual is not to make a decision to be selfish. It is a genetic trait and cannot be changed past a certain point in embryotic development. To be breif, the homosexuality gene is not a freak gene - its a number of genes present in members of the opposite sex expressed in a member of the gender it does not belong, making the person naturally attracted to men as women are or as naturally attracted to women as men are. This gene being present does not suppress the natural urge to raise young, however. So homosexual couples do not adopt simply to justify their relationship.

I will leave you with this: how many of you actually KNOW a homosexual?

ElJay:

I’ve not seen one study from one reputable scientist that’s been published in any responsible journal that supports your contention that there is a “gay gene” or any group of genes carry out that function. Although this may be congenital, No responsible researcher has published evidence that this is genitic.

This is like any of our other powerful urges to sin - It’s a result of something you’ve said elsewhere you choose not to believe in, The Fall of Man from God’s Grace. It’s the same thing that causes thefts and murders and promiscuity and just about every other problem that ills society today.

It’s a flaw in our soul. if that weren’t true, then Apostolates such as Courage Apostolate wouldn’t have the success they have, and the transformative power of the Spirit of God couldn’t have any effect on it.

And, you see where I live - I know LOTS of Gays (and Lesbians), and the parish I go to Baptized a LOT of gays before they died of AIDS, and I know a couple of people who have buried a lot of people who’ve died of AIDS. I hope you weren’t using that to judge whether or not someone’s opinion could or should be taken seriously, or worse, whether someone had the right to talk on this subject. That would be worse than anything anyone has suggested about you.

I still remember the shock at the West Hollywood City Hall when they realized who and what International Solidarity supported after IS had run a “Float” in the Gay…Pride Parade (I remember when it was just Gay Pride, and didn’t have all the rest).

I know you’re an ATHEIST, but I beg you to look at the claims of Jesus Christ and to read what He had to say about himself for yourself. And, think about this - There are three people walking around at my parish whom the medical doctors believe should have died. I can explain that. Can you?

In Christ, Michael

 

[Jasny]

Libero:

But the child was not killed for refusing to call the lesbian ‘daddy’ - only LifeSite seems to have made that up - non of the other sites mention it at all. The child was killed after prolonged physical abuse, and if we were to pin it to one event, it seems that it is because the boy did not want to eat the dinner.

This is were the story originated below. “The Star” newspaper is a legitimate news source. There is nothing about being killed for not eating his dinner. This paper would be in trouble for false reporting because it ran the story on the front page.

The Star is published in Johannesburg since 17 October 1887
thestar.co.za/index.php?fSectionId=128&fArticleId=3171828

 

[Jasny]

ElJay:

I’ve not seen one study from one reputable scientist that’s been published in any responsible journal that supports your contention that there is a “gay gene” or any group of genes carry out that function. Although this may be congenital, No responsible researcher has published evidence that this is genitic.

I feel bad for homosexuals because I think they are being duped by the new Eugenics Movement. They are so desperate to avoid any resposibility for their behavior they go for the genitic thing very easily. It could come back to haunt them like the Nazi’s use of them in the begining and then turned on them in the end. I wish they would see their true friends are the devout christians.

 

[Libero]

I feel bad for homosexuals because I think they are being duped by the new Eugenics Movement. They are so desperate to avoid any resposibility for their behavior they go for the genitic thing very easily. It could come back to haunt them like the Nazi’s use of them in the begining and then turned on them in the end. I wish they would see their true friends are the devout christians.
[/quote]

Yeah the devout Christians… What???

I am not sure that these people are so desperate to avoid responsibilty - as in a lot of cases they havn’t done anything wrong.

I suppose they could have their devout Christian friend force them into going to NARTH because they are so obsessed about the person changing though…