Abortion is genocide

[Aquinas11]

So we are left with you suggesting that you can’t tell who the more evil person is.

We are left with you not defining what an “evil person” is, due to no objective basis of morality

Hence your “it’s a tough one” on whether rapist or parker more evil

 

[Freddy]

Freddy:

So we are left with you suggesting that you can’t tell who the more evil person is.

We are left with you not defining what an “evil person” is, due to no objective basis of morality

Hence your “it’s a tough one” on whether rapist or parker more evil

Poor attempt at deflection. It should not be a tough call to make whatever your basis for morality. But it seems that your basis for morality makes you incapable of telling us who you think the more evil.

 

[Aquinas11]

It should not be a tough call to make whatever your basis for morality.

If no objective basis of morality, then can’t define “evil” and thus “that’s a hard one” aka “tough call”

your basis for morality makes you incapable of telling us who you think the more evil.

You’re conceding the argument. “Judging actions and not actors” itself arises from an objective basis of morality and thus would be vehemently opposed by one without an objective basis of morality

 

[Freddy]

Freddy:

It should not be a tough call to make whatever your basis for morality.

If no objective basis of morality, then can’t define “evil” and thus “that’s a hard one” aka “tough call”

“Judging actions and not actors” itself arises from an objective basis of morality…

Yeah, we get it. You aren’t able to differentiate between someone who makes a minor infraction of a traffic law and a rapist. Every post you make that doesn’t deny that only confirms what you originally said. You have had multiple opportunities to retract it. And I’m sure you’ll make another one that doesn’t.

Let me help you out to save further embarressment:

‘It’s not for you to judge people. Only God can do that’.

That’s the best you can hope for.

 

[Aquinas11]

You aren’t able to differentiate between someone who makes a minor infraction of a traffic law and a rapist

Irony is nuclear given you still haven’t provided definition for “evil”, alas the above statement was self directed

 

[Aquinas11]

Yeah, we get it.

Ok so now we’re in agreement that the action of rape is worse than parking . Not sure why you kept disagreeing for so long that it’s “a tough one”??

But who is we? I’m concerned now

 

[Freddy]

Freddy:

You aren’t able to differentiate between someone who makes a minor infraction of a traffic law and a rapist

Irony is nuclear given you still haven’t provided definition for “evil”, alas the above statement was self directed

I don’t need to define evil for you to determine who is evil. That’s not a prerequisite. Your statement still stands.

 

[Aquinas11]

I don’t need to define evil

You aren’t able to differentiate between someone who makes a minor infraction of a traffic law and a rapist

 

[Freddy]

Freddy:

Yeah, we get it.

Ok so now we’re in agreement that the action of rape is worse than parking . Not sure why you kept disagreeing for so long that it’s “a tough one”??

But who is we? I’m concerned now

I didn’t disagree. I made a sarcastic remark which you knew was sarcastic, yet chose to interpret it as being factual to deflect from your statement that you cannot tell who is the more evil of the two examples. And the ‘we’ is everyone who has read what you have written.

 

[Aquinas11]

your statement that you cannot tell who is the more evil

evil? but you just said evil has no definition so not sure how you’re writing all these posts.

 

[Freddy]

Freddy:

I don’t need to define evil

You aren’t able to differentiate between someone who makes a minor infraction of a traffic law and a rapist

I can. You are the one who said that you couldn’t. Here it is again:

‘I only say what actions are worse than others’.

 

[Freddy]

Freddy:

your statement that you cannot tell who is the more evil

evil? but you just said evil has no definition so not sure how you’re writing all these posts.

Now you are just making things up. What was said:

‘I don’t need to define evil for you to determine who is evil.’

This is a good point to leave you to your own devices.

 

[Aquinas11]

I can.

You can’t without a definition of “evil”

 

[Aquinas11]

Now you are just making things up

You Literally said “I don’t need to define evil” then consistently said “it’s a tough one” (whether rapist or Parker more evil) after which retracted that and made claims about evil without defining it. So All over the place it’s hard to keep track.

 

[VanitasVanitatum]

Ok so now its something other than ambiguity in law/culture that determines evil intent, now its whether they’re “completely brainwashed and didn’t know any better” which I’ve no idea what that means.

Some people are just ignorant and knowledge is neccessary for culpability.

 

[Aquinas11]

No idea what all that means either. Could mean 100 different things to 100 different people

 

[VanitasVanitatum]

Some people just don’t know better. Since it is an interior quality, it can be hard to tell if it qualifies or not.

 

[Aquinas11]

can be hard to tell if it qualifies

Again no idea what you’re talking about

 

[VanitasVanitatum]

What do you not understand? Or are you trying to make joke of sorts?

 

[Aquinas11]

You responded to a post that was discussing specific quoted language and then proceeded to bring up other language so yes your posts make no sense