B
BornInMarch
Guest
None of those things result in a human being killed; that’s the difference.Yes.
I suppose next you want to criminalise homosexuality, adultery etc etc, in fact anything that is a mortal sin??!!
None of those things result in a human being killed; that’s the difference.Yes.
I suppose next you want to criminalise homosexuality, adultery etc etc, in fact anything that is a mortal sin??!!
I’m surprised that you more readily compare abortion and homosexuality - the latter being immoral but arguably victimless behaviour - than abortion and, say, infanticide. Isn’t abortion more akin to infanticide? Or do you see something lacking in the unborn that lessens their claim to the same respect and protections due a newborn? **Yes.
I suppose next you want to criminalise homosexuality, adultery etc etc, in fact anything that is a mortal sin??!!
I’m of the opinion that women, or more likely girls, should be counselled and educated, NOT punished.I see your point, but I don’t think we should treat abortion in the same way legally as we do those ^^ immoral acts.
I think we should treat abortion in the same way as we do women who kill their babies 1-2 days after birth–understand that this is illegal (we must protect the most vulnerable legally!) but take in to account the mitigating circumstances.
Is that regardless of whether the victim is born or unborn?I’m of the opinion that women, or more likely girls, should be counselled and educated, NOT punished.
Not even if they knowingly and freely take another human’s life? Would letting them go scot-free not devalue the lives of those aborted?I’m of the opinion that women, or more likely girls, should be counselled and educated, NOT punished.
Then it would seem that no changes can be expected. lifesitenews.com/news/poll-50-percent-of-all-catholics-support-abortion-in-all-or-most-casesIt is infeasible that the law could be changed until a sufficient share of the people concur with the change.
I would be willing to bet that most do not willingly get abortions but a lot of pressure is put on them and many are even in my view not mature enough to fully understand what they are doing.Not even if they knowingly and freely take another human’s life? Would letting them go scot-free not devalue the lives of those aborted?
There is no need to bet thistle. Stats are available.I would be willing to bet that most do not willingly get abortions but a lot of pressure is put on them and many are even in my view not mature enough to fully understand what they are doing.
By the way I would like you to show me any Church document that states any woman/girl having an abortion should be punished.
Certainly I don’t expect a step-change any time soon.Then it would seem that no changes can be expected. lifesitenews.com/news/poll-50-percent-of-all-catholics-support-abortion-in-all-or-most-cases
What can we do to reduce these numbers? Free federally funded childcare and before /aftercare? Free federally funded ongoing marriage counseling? Free federally funded OB care for women who make too much $ for medicaid but not enough to afford their own medical insurance or care. Many people are in debt or are struggling to keep their heads above water. Abortions are cost effective. We need to make other options free. It’s not enough to say, you got pregnant, now you have to deal with it. That attitude is not at all Christ like and it’s akin to pretending reality does not exist. The reality is that we need to address the drivers of abortion and in many many cases, the driver is lack of resources.There is no need to bet thistle. Stats are available.
It is a mistake to think that abortions are overwhelmingly pursued by “young girls, pressured into it”. 75% of women cite interference with work, school or other responsibilities among their reasons to abort. 50% said they do not want to be a single parent or are having marital difficulties.
- over 58% of abortions are had by women 20-29 years of age.
- Those under 15 account for 4 in 10,000 abortions (0.04%).
- 60% of women seeking abortions had prior live births.
Guttmacher Institute figures for 2012.
And to your last point thistle, are you suggesting that punishment for wrongdoing ought not apply unless the Church advocates it? I’d like you to show me a church document that proposes that!![]()
On the first point, I would say that youth is already a mitigating factor (its illegal for judges to sentence minors to life imprisonment) and that if someone gets an abortion because of threats or duress than the person forcing her hand should take her place in the jail cell.I would be willing to bet that most do not willingly get abortions but a lot of pressure is put on them and many are even in my view not mature enough to fully understand what they are doing.
By the way I would like you to show me any Church document that states any woman/girl having an abortion should be punished.
No doubt greater social supports would be a necessary prerequisite to underpin the change in people’s attitude necessary for any change in the law.…We need to make other options free. It’s not enough to say, you got pregnant, now you have to deal with it. That attitude is not at all Christ like and it’s akin to pretending reality does not exist. The reality is that we need to address the drivers of abortion and in many many cases, the driver is lack of resources.
Should the time arrive where abortion is criminalised, it will not be an “either/or” situation. The social support will at that point be improved, but transgressors will expect a punishment if caught.Let;s stop trying to punish and hurt and instead assist and guide.
I said “arguably victimless”. That means - I can see why a person who thinks SSM is good might argue that it is victimless.I’m actually surprised you say homosexuality is arguably “victimless” behavior.
I was under the impression that many Catholics–at least, many on this forum–feel there are collateral-damage victims when someone expresses their homosexual orientation in the same way a heterosexual expresses and lives out theirs.
Isn’t that one of the reasons many here give for not legalizing same-sex marriage?
Understandable observation. It seems to me that the assertion that the offspring of humans is also human is self-evident. That the Bible lends support is comforting, but not necessary to make the assertion.One flaw of your logic here is…you are basing your opinion partly on the Christian bible–
If you kept reading you would see that I also listed scientific support for the unborn being a living human being.One flaw of your logic here is…you are basing your opinion partly on the Christian bible–one set of scripture for one specific religion.
If everyone in the world followed the teachings of Christianity and believed the Christian canon was true and correct and agreed on the interpretation of it, then maybe you would have a point.
But they do not.
As I think someone else here might have said…it’s like asking you to wear a burkha, because it’s in the Quran. But why should you follow the laws of the Quran if you are not Muslim?
.
I agree, I’m lucky to be in area with an archdiocese level prison ministry. It advocates for criminal justice reform that stresses rehabilitation over punishment. I can’t see the Church ever advocating for punishment for abortion. Yet I can see see the Church fighting against it.Legal or illegal abortion I doubt there are any regiistered Catholic supported Pro-Life Organisations that would advocate punishment of the woman, and if ever they did they certainly wouldn’t have my support.
Can you expand on your reasons eg. Why the Church might oppose punishment for abortion, but support it for infanticide? I’m not expressing a view here, but interested to understand your thinking.… I can’t see the Church ever advocating for punishment for abortion.
Do you feel the same way if a woman, or girl, kills her 1 day old baby?I’m of the opinion that women, or more likely girls, should be counselled and educated, NOT punished.