T
ToeInTheWater
Guest
Thanks for all the replies! BTW, for those who did marry men who are 15-20 years older, I am not trying to question your relationships at all. Just that I think that a large age gap does present challenges to a relationship that might not be present with smaller age gaps. But of course smaller age gap relationships can have challenges as well.
Xantippe, just FYI re Emma, as I recall Mr. Knightley was actually pretty rich himself, I think he may actually have been richer than Emma. But he did consider his age to be a liability, and assumed Emma was in love with Frank Churchill, a man much closer to her age. As for Marianne and Col. Brandon, certainly Brandon’s age was brought up as a problem in-universe, in this case he really was old enough to be her father, as he actually has a “stepdaughter” around Marianne’s age.
Anyway, I think those examples show that even in a era in which age gaps of 10-20 years were more common and acceptable, people did see such an “old enough to be her father” age gap as a challenge even back then; perhaps not as much as people do now, but they weren’t considered “ho-hum, nothing to see here” either.
On the other hand, the age gaps between Elizabeth Bennett and Mr. Darcy (she is 20, he is 28), seems to be not at all an issue, I think Edmund and Fanny had a similar age gap, and it seems most of the other heroines wind up with men 5-6 years their senior. Which makes sense because most men weren’t considered “eligible” for marriage until at least after they reached the age of majority, and wouldn’t even be looking for a bride until then. I don’t think such age gaps would be considered problematic even in modern times.
I also suppose that in more “traditional” societies, large age gaps are less of a problem, but then again, in such societies, wives are often seen NOT as equal partners in a relationship, but as subordinate to the husband, indeed some rad-trad types even now seem to see the wife’s role as almost a quasi-child, unquestioningly obeying her husband, and therefore, not really needing life experience and maturity. Or, the marriages are more for convenience, or even totally arranged, and compatibility between the spouses isn’t seen as important as in more “modern” cultures.
Interestingly, two of my aunts married men much older than themselves who were certainly old enough to be their fathers, and both were quite happy in the marriages, though unfortunately one of them hasn’t done too well by herself after her husband died in terms of managing her finances, as actually been victimized by con artists more than once, though certainly this has also happened to older widows whose husbands were closer to their age.
On the other hand, another aunt of mine married a man about ten years younger, something that was considered quite scandalous back then, but that aunt also had her own business at the time, and was much more independent than most women of that generation.
Xantippe, just FYI re Emma, as I recall Mr. Knightley was actually pretty rich himself, I think he may actually have been richer than Emma. But he did consider his age to be a liability, and assumed Emma was in love with Frank Churchill, a man much closer to her age. As for Marianne and Col. Brandon, certainly Brandon’s age was brought up as a problem in-universe, in this case he really was old enough to be her father, as he actually has a “stepdaughter” around Marianne’s age.
Anyway, I think those examples show that even in a era in which age gaps of 10-20 years were more common and acceptable, people did see such an “old enough to be her father” age gap as a challenge even back then; perhaps not as much as people do now, but they weren’t considered “ho-hum, nothing to see here” either.
On the other hand, the age gaps between Elizabeth Bennett and Mr. Darcy (she is 20, he is 28), seems to be not at all an issue, I think Edmund and Fanny had a similar age gap, and it seems most of the other heroines wind up with men 5-6 years their senior. Which makes sense because most men weren’t considered “eligible” for marriage until at least after they reached the age of majority, and wouldn’t even be looking for a bride until then. I don’t think such age gaps would be considered problematic even in modern times.
I also suppose that in more “traditional” societies, large age gaps are less of a problem, but then again, in such societies, wives are often seen NOT as equal partners in a relationship, but as subordinate to the husband, indeed some rad-trad types even now seem to see the wife’s role as almost a quasi-child, unquestioningly obeying her husband, and therefore, not really needing life experience and maturity. Or, the marriages are more for convenience, or even totally arranged, and compatibility between the spouses isn’t seen as important as in more “modern” cultures.
Interestingly, two of my aunts married men much older than themselves who were certainly old enough to be their fathers, and both were quite happy in the marriages, though unfortunately one of them hasn’t done too well by herself after her husband died in terms of managing her finances, as actually been victimized by con artists more than once, though certainly this has also happened to older widows whose husbands were closer to their age.
On the other hand, another aunt of mine married a man about ten years younger, something that was considered quite scandalous back then, but that aunt also had her own business at the time, and was much more independent than most women of that generation.