Thats not a compromise because they can do that now.And I suppose that you would agree that deporting illegal aliens but allowing them apply for legal entry via their local US Embassy under the same terms as anyone else would be a compromise too, correct?
You may not like it, but it WOULD be a compromise
Yeah amnesty is amnesty and it isn’t whats being proposed. It hasn’t been proposed since…hmmm since Ronald Reagan enacted it into law. The Dems the last few years have been for earned citizenship. That is the opposite of amnesty.
And Obama’s proposal wasn’t a compromise it didn’t change what was happening either. The Bishops would still have had to offer contraceptive and abortion coverage as part of employment.Thats not a compromise because they can do that now.
Thats not true. The latest compromise expanded the religious institution exemption and they wouldn’t pay for any contraceptive services. Its through a third party. And again this is the 2nd time the administration has compromised on the original HHS mandate which to me shows a willingness to work with them.And Obama’s proposal wasn’t a compromise it didn’t change what was happening either. The Bishops would still have had to offer contraceptive and abortion coverage as part of employment.
The bill simply would have been disguised in the insurance premium.
The Bishops would still have to pay and the illegals could not remain with their families, so no compromise in either case then.
I read this and just have to shake my head. I might not be a minority, but I just about made middle class about 5 yrs ago, and it’s been downhill ever since. If Obama is going to help me, I wish he’d hurry up and do it before it’s too late.
Good evening, littlenothing,
Don’t hold your breath, pardner.
Smoke and mirrors. They still have to provide it in their insurance policies. These “compromises” are a sham, and the bishops have recognized that. So have the Sisters you dismissed as liars.
Reagan proposed amnesty and it passed. McCain proposed amnesty, and it didn’t. The Dems propose amnesty and it hasn’t, except to the extent Obama amnestied millions without any legislative action whatever.
Ah, so if a third party did the deportations on behalf of the Federal government,
You can disagree with me but please try to be respectful. I won’t respond if you can’t.
Look, Obama is a class warrior who would make any socialist propagandist proud. This man’s record is so slimy that his defenders must shut off their capacity for rational thought. He kicks Christians and Constitutionalists in the teeth at every turn, and yet many refuse to see it, or NOT see it, in the instance of the shouded crucifix at Georgetown. You would think that ALL thinking CHristians would oppose him at this juncture. But no, we defenders of the faith must battle through many people an avalanche of Obama minions who SHOULD be our natural allies. It’s maddening.
RobBut of course. However, your logic and my analogy you said you did not understand were the, except I used black instead of illegal. If one makes no sense, then neither does the other. Ergo, one is not promoting sex slavery by hiring an undocumented person to mow their lawn.
This is a good point that is often lost in the immigration debate: the reason why Hispanics want to immigrate in the first place - which is to find a job and have opportunity, maybe a better life. Mexico has chronic corruption but if it ever got its act together could be a leading country. More pressure needs to be put on Mexico to improve its conditions and government. The conditions there are contributing to fiscal problems in border states such as California.
They recreate the corruption here, this is true.
Yet the Lord taught, "They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’
pnewton has addressed the commands of Christ. I wanted to also add, the same country makes abortion legal.