Animals You Eat: Bad Meat!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marfran
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Isn’t that the BEST video!!

Please add it to the resources on the Group site -
will do… you know i looked into nonviolence.org really quick, and i don’t think they support anything that is against the church. i’m sure someone will find something against them so they can ignore everything they say, but if there is, i couldn’t find it.
 
You know, what is wrong with “you eat what YOU like, and I will eat what I like.”?

If you don’t like something, then DON"T EAT IT! But NO ONE has the right to tell ANYONE ELSE what they should or should not eat! Period.

My problem with some (note I said some - clearly NOT all) vegans or vegetarians is that they (again some - clearly NOT all) is that they seem to think they are somehow morally superior to those who choose to eat meat. This is clearly not true. ANYONE who thinks they are morally superior are guilty of the sin of vanity, IMO.

And now for some levity. Here is the advice my MIL’s doctor emailed her in response to her question:

Q: Should I cut down on meat and eat more fruits and vegetables?
A: You must grasp logistical efficiencies. What does a cow eat? Hay and corn. And what are these? Vegetables. So a steak is nothing more than an efficient mechanism of delivering vegetables to your system. Need grain? Eat chicken. Beef is also a good source of field grass (green leafy vegetable). And a pork chop can give you 100% of your recommended daily allowance of vegetable products.
 
No offense but your logic is flawed. Hitler is dead. Having his toaster is benign–it does not perpetrate continued suffering. Owning a videocam that was used to film porn does not perpetuate the production of porn. Supporting industries that have any kind of unethical practices perpetuates the continuation of those practices/conditions.
Perhaps I was unclear when I said “made by Hitler”. I mean “made” as in made by the people who ended up as slaver labourers because of his regime. People expect me to feel guilty of about eating food that was allegedly produced by child labor yet you won’t feel guilty if the thing you’re using to toast your bread was made by oppressed hands? As for the video cam, the same can be said. You’re holding something that was used to produce money via the most depraved form of entertainment possible. Even I would find that awkward.
Vegans can beat me up on this one: Vegans do not purchase or wear animal products such as leather, wool, etc. because it perpetuates the continuation of the production of those products. Supply and Demand. I personally feel it is OK to purchase a leather purse from a resale shop, or to own an antique animal whatever, but would not purchase any new items from companies that currently produce these items, because then I would be placing a vote (by my purchase) for the continuation of the production of these products.

If you are purchasing meat from companies that abuse animals, or have other objectionable practices, or enlist in child labor you are contributing to the problem by the vote of your purchase.
Age doesn’t change how a product was made and what methods/materials were used to make it. Neither does the fact of them being unable to perpetuate anything change what they were used for. The point is, you’re holding something that has a seriously dark history.
so… at least now I think I understand what you were trying to say.

The difference however is
  1. if someone is living on land that had previously been an Indian Burial Ground - no one is being injured today.
  2. If someone owned a toaster made by Hitler - using it in no way continues to employ him, he is dead. If however by purchasing it I am supporting neo-natzies (sp?) then that would be wrong.
  3. If I use a vidocamera that had been used to film porm, by using that camera I am not supporting that industry UNLESS I purchase it from people who film porn and they profit from my purchase.
So what Marfran and I are trying to say is that yes there is a connection…

IF you knew your dinner came from the slaughterhouse where those children were working would you eat it anyway?
Actually I would, but not before reporting the slaughterhouse to the nearest NGO. However, unlike the products I’ve mentioned, when I buy meat it doesn’t even have any labels on it so how would you expect me to determine if it was made by child labor? Marketplaces here add even more to the variety because theirs probably comes straight from the farm. You see? It’s pointless trying to make me feel guilty when each piece of meat I might I buy could come from one slaughter house and then another. I can have my meat cut by an American or a Mexican, but it doesn’t change the meat you know. :rolleyes:
i would be interested to know what the answer to that last question is too.

i’d like to add this thought: if you knew that eating meat helped support planned parenthood… would you eat it anyway?

you see, thousands of babies die every day from hunger and lack of clean water. in some places, factory farming is the direct cause of low wages that keep families poor, and the pollution that fouls the water and makes people sick. i’m thinking right now of la gloria, mexico, and its friendly neighborhood industrial hog farm that caused the current H1N1 A influenza that killed many people in mexico, including 2 infants.

why is it imperative for catholics to boycott certain industries if it causes babies to die from abortion, but balk and scream if someone says we should boycott industries that causes babies to die from the poverty and disease tied to those industries?
You know this reminds me of that thread telling people to boycott Microsoft because Bill Gates donated to Planned Parenthood. Am I going to overhaul the Operating Systems of all 10-15 computers here in my internet cafe just because of that? -.-;; Sorry, no can do.
 
ATTENTION to EVERYONE who is SERIOUS about this topic. It has just come to my attention that several posters here have joined this discussion for the intent purpose to be disruptive. To those posters please reconsider your involvement.

To SERIOUS posters please be informed that these posters are anti-human in addition to being anti-animal. Please check their profiles: distracted, Eddie Mac, and DanteAl have NO FRIENDS. Lost Wanderer has 5 FRIENDS but is a TEENAGER (and should probably have the guidance of an adult if he is to continue to participate).

I AM POSTING this not as an embarrassment, but as a guide for SERIOUS posters so that they can choose not to engage with the above-mentioned posters.

Thank you all!!
I did not join this to be disruptive.

I see nowhere in the forum rules where I must have forum friends to post in the threads.

I do not see the word moderator on your posts anywhere. Who are you to direct who can post and who cannot?

If you object to a post, report it to the moderators and let them do their job.

You are one of the morally superior ones I spoke of and I doubt seriously if you and I could be friends.

My friends do not treat me in the manner you are treating those whose posts you object to.

If this is your idea of friendship I do not want it.

Eddie Mac
 
You know, what is wrong with “you eat what YOU like, and I will eat what I like.”?

If you don’t like something, then DON"T EAT IT! But NO ONE has the right to tell ANYONE ELSE what they should or should not eat! Period.

My problem with some (note I said some - clearly NOT all) vegans or vegetarians is that they (again some - clearly NOT all) is that they seem to think they are somehow morally superior to those who choose to eat meat. This is clearly not true. ANYONE who thinks they are morally superior are guilty of the sin of vanity, IMO.
)

And now for some levity. Here is the advice my MIL’s doctor emailed her in response to her question:

Q: Should I cut down on meat and eat more fruits and vegetables?
A: You must grasp logistical efficiencies. What does a cow eat? Hay and corn. And what are these? Vegetables. So a steak is nothing more than an efficient mechanism of delivering vegetables to your system. Need grain? Eat chicken. Beef is also a good source of field grass (green leafy vegetable). And a pork chop can give you 100% of your recommended daily allowance of vegetable products.
Logistics.?
For a poor country where people eat few animal products, reaching self-sufficiency in food grains requires just 200 kilograms of cereals per person per year. But that number quickly rises when people switch from a grain-based diet to a meat-based one. Rapidly industrializing Taiwan, for instance, increased per-capita consumption of meat and eggs sixfold from 1950 to 1990. To produce those animal products required raising annual per-capita grain use in the country from 170 kilograms to 390 kilograms. Despite steadily growing harvests, Taiwan could only keep up with the demand for feed by turning to imports from abroad. In 1950 Taiwan was a grain exporter; in 1990, the nation imported, mostly for feed, 74 percent of the grain it used. (Vocke 1986; Sarma 1986; Bailey 1990; USDA 1990)
 
ATTENTION to EVERYONE who is SERIOUS about this topic. It has just come to my attention that several posters here have joined this discussion for the intent purpose to be disruptive. To those posters please reconsider your involvement.

To SERIOUS posters please be informed that these posters are anti-human in addition to being anti-animal. Please check their profiles: distracted, Eddie Mac, and DanteAl have NO FRIENDS. Lost Wanderer has 5 FRIENDS but is a TEENAGER (and should probably have the guidance of an adult if he is to continue to participate).

I AM POSTING this not as an embarrassment, but as a guide for SERIOUS posters so that they can choose not to engage with the above-mentioned posters.

Thank you all!!
I did not join this to be disruptive.

I see nowhere in the forum rules where I must have forum friends to post in the threads.

I do not see the word moderator on your posts anywhere. Who are you to direct who can post and who cannot?

If you object to a post, report it to the moderators and let them do their job.

You are one of the morally superior ones I spoke of and I doubt seriously if you and I could be friends.

My friends do not treat me in the manner you are treating those whose posts you object to.

If this is your idea of friendship I do not want it.

Eddie Mac
You know Marfran, I have been part of these forums for MANY years. I do not have “friends” on the forum either (what exactly is the point of that???) To be more “popular”? Let people be. Like I said earlier, those who put down meat eaters to make themselves appear “morally superior” are guilty of vanity, IMO. Let people be.
 
…]

You know this reminds me of that thread telling people to boycott Microsoft because Bill Gates donated to Planned Parenthood. Am I going to overhaul the Operating Systems of all 10-15 computers here in my internet cafe just because of that? -.-;; Sorry, no can do.
oh come on… what’s wrong with ubuntu? 😉 😛

many catholics tell me, “boycott such and such because they support planned parenthood.” the point is this, if someone says, “boycott con-agra brands because they support planned parenthood” we’re all about it. if someone says, “boycott con-agra brands because they contain factory farmed animals” then we have to hear about how superior and elitist we are to suggest such a thing 🤷
 
Logistics.?
For a poor country where people eat few animal products, reaching self-sufficiency in food grains requires just 200 kilograms of cereals per person per year. But that number quickly rises when people switch from a grain-based diet to a meat-based one. Rapidly industrializing Taiwan, for instance, increased per-capita consumption of meat and eggs sixfold from 1950 to 1990. To produce those animal products required raising annual per-capita grain use in the country from 170 kilograms to 390 kilograms. Despite steadily growing harvests, Taiwan could only keep up with the demand for feed by turning to imports from abroad. In 1950 Taiwan was a grain exporter; in 1990, the nation imported, mostly for feed, 74 percent of the grain it used. (Vocke 1986; Sarma 1986; Bailey 1990; USDA 1990)
So? If you don’t want to eat meat, DON"T EAT IT!! But don’t you DARE get on your high horse and tell anyone else they can’t or shouldn’t! I may not personally care for many things you eat or wear, but you don’t see me trying to dictate to you what you should or should not consume or use! That, my friend, is called personal freedom of choice.
 
incidentally, even if you choose to eat meat, you really should boycott conAgra… they do support PP, they do contribute to the problems of factory farming. their brands are (oh yes they are a juggernaut):

chef boyardee
david seeds
egg beaters
healthy choice
hebrew national
hunt’s
kid cuisine
marie callender’s
orville redenbacher’s
pam
reddi-wip
slim jim
ACT II
PARKAY
ALEXIA
PATIO
ANDY CAPP’S
PEMMICAN
BANQUET
PENROSE
BANQUET BROWN 'N SERVE
PETER PAN
BLUE BONNET
POPPYCOCK
CRUNCH 'N MUNCH
RANCH STYLE
DENNISON’S
RO*TEL
FIDDLE FADDLE
ROSARITA
FLEISCHMANN’S
SNACK PACK
GULDEN’S
SWISS MISS
JIFFY POP
VAN CAMP’S
LA CHOY
WESSON
LIBBY’S
WOLF
LUCK’S
MANWICH
 
So? If you don’t want to eat meat, DON"T EAT IT!! But don’t you DARE get on your high horse and tell anyone else they can’t or shouldn’t! I may not personally care for many things you eat or wear, but you don’t see me trying to dictate to you what you should or should not consume or use! That, my friend, is called personal freedom of choice.
Yeah.
uh,…I think that if you read any of my posts I repeatedly emphasized that it is not about whether you should eat meat or not…Its that whole Romans chapter 14 thing
vs 13-22.
No, it is more about the place where we live and what will be left for our children. I don’t care if you eat meat. I just don’t want to get sick because of the irresponsible practices of really big factory farms.
For instance…
oh, H1N1(aka swine flu…)
 
The Swine Flu And Worldwide Economic Recession: Humanity’s Salvation?

Undoubtedly, some animal welfare people are hoping that swine flu will serve as a wake-up call for humanity, that the “groupthink” in support of intensive farming might move toward thoughtfulness about the health hazards and cruelty of intensively confining animals, and that governments will pass laws to make these “confined animal feeding operations” (CAFOs, the industry term for “factory farm”) smaller, cleaner, less cruel, and less dependent on drugs–which are used to keep the animals alive through the filthy and stressful conditions that would otherwise kill them in much greater numbers.

I must admit that this does feel like a wake-up call: Are we really so addicted to eating meat (even as we demand that meat be inexpensive, meat processors want to make more money, which means faster, meaner ways of raising and slaughtering animals for food) that we’re willing to risk the millions who could die from such mutating viruses? Has our desire for gustatory pleasure at any cost pushed us into terrible consequences as we creep toward an ugly future? The “big one” may not be this particular version of the flu, but scientists say we have not seen the last of H1N1; not by a long shot.

huffingtonpost.com/kathy-freston/the-swine-flu-and-worldwi_b_195816.html
 
So? If you don’t want to eat meat, DON"T EAT IT!! But don’t you DARE get on your high horse and tell anyone else they can’t or shouldn’t! I may not personally care for many things you eat or wear, but you don’t see me trying to dictate to you what you should or should not consume or use! That, my friend, is called personal freedom of choice.
it’s funny, that’s what the anti-life crowd tells me when i say abortion is wrong. 😊

the point of this thread is not to say “don’t eat meat.” if you had read through it you’d see that. you came in here telling us that we are not as good of catholics as people who don’t talk about factory farming. now you say WE are judging you, even though none of us have tried to “dictate” what you can eat.

as i said to another poster… if you feel the conversation is unworthy, WHY ARE YOU HERE if not to be disruptive?
 
OK, I’m referring this thread to the mods, in case they haven’t seen it. The amount of uncharitable sniping that’s going on here (from both sides, but primarily from those who have an agenda of one sort or another) is getting ridiculous.

For crying out loud, “You don’t have any friends here? Don’t you like people?” :rolleyes:

And to answer those who are upset about people turning this into a meat debate:

If you make a cogent argument that illustrates your point instead of suggesting that people go track down a propaganda video (to which you didn’t provide a link, I might add), you might get the discussion you want. In any case, I apologize for misreading the topic of this thread; I’m done with it now.

Peace,
Dante
 
You guys are funny. I simply do not have time to read through 45 pages of nonsense. (My steak will burn if I am on here that long, and burned steak is not as good as a delicately grilled succulent well seasoned piece of meat that has been carefully cooked over a glowing bed of charcoal! Mmmmmm good!)

Personally, I believe this whole H1N1 flu thing is soooo blown out of proportion. It is no more of a “serious threat” than the “regular” influenza that occurs every year! It’s just that this one has the media’s attention. The “bird flu” is also blown out of proportion. Many of the food contaminations that occur are becauese human waste is found on the greenery (ie. Joe Migrant worker defacating in the fields and not washing his hands!)

So, bottom line, you eat what you want, and I will eat what I like and what tastes good. I’ll be happy with my steak, burgers, chops, and ribs, and you will all still seemingly be extremely frustrated that we don’t all agree with you while you swallow whatever vegan concotion it is you eat! I’ve tried some vegan stuff…blech. No thanks. Eating should not be punishment.

Whatever floats your boat, I guess…

Have a good one!
 
ATTENTION to EVERYONE who is SERIOUS about this topic. It has just come to my attention that several posters here have joined this discussion for the intent purpose to be disruptive. To those posters please reconsider your involvement.

To SERIOUS posters please be informed that these posters are anti-human in addition to being anti-animal. Please check their profiles: distracted, Eddie Mac, and DanteAl have NO FRIENDS. Lost Wanderer has 5 FRIENDS but is a TEENAGER (and should probably have the guidance of an adult if he is to continue to participate).

I AM POSTING this not as an embarrassment, but as a guide for SERIOUS posters so that they can choose not to engage with the above-mentioned posters.

Thank you all!!
What on earth does the number of “friends” one has on one’s profile have do do with anything??? I think if you take the time to read my past posts, you will find them respectful, sincere, generally well-thought out and well written, and often pithy, if not correct.

I only recently found this so-called “friends” function, and I have no need of it. This is not Facebook. If I strike up a true friendship on this forum, it’s not your business or anyone elses.

This – coupled with the lack of charity in some of your responses to this thread – is why I respectfully decline your friend request.

Peace,
Dante
 
OK, I’m referring this thread to the mods, in case they haven’t seen it. The amount of uncharitable sniping that’s going on here (from both sides, but primarily from those who have an agenda of one sort or another) is getting ridiculous.

For crying out loud, “You don’t have any friends here? Don’t you like people?” :rolleyes:

And to answer those who are upset about people turning this into a meat debate:

If you make a cogent argument that illustrates your point instead of suggesting that people go track down a propaganda video (to which you didn’t provide a link, I might add), you might get the discussion you want. In any case, I apologize for misreading the topic of this thread; I’m done with it now.

Peace,
Dante
we have made many cogent arguments that illustrate our pointS. we have linked to other videos and other sources. the truth is, there are no sources of truth good enough for some people, and they will come in here bickering and telling us how we don’t care about the unborn and what an unworthy discussion this is, and why we shouldn’t tell people what to do, when we aren’t even doing that.

honestly, why on earth would i debate abortion on a catholic site? preaching to the choir doesn’t effect any change. but just because i don’t do it here, doesn’t mean i don’t do it - the insinuation that we don’t fight for the unborn is frankly very hurtful and the people saying it would be ashamed of what they’ve said, if they knew how involved i have been with pro-life organizations and how i have fought with other vegans over this issue. i have a facebook group just for pro-life vegans and vegetarians for hellsakes. i’m completely at loss to understand why some people come in here screaming that they feel judged, while judging others in this manner 😦

incidentally - good you reported this thread. actually WE have been reporting this thread too on account of the poll being added by a hijacker and all the trolls from various people. we are just trying to have a discussion about factory farms. i don’t think we should be run off from that just because some people don’t feel it is worthy of good catholics.
 
You guys are funny. I simply do not have time to read through 45 pages of nonsense. (My steak will burn if I am on here that long, and burned steak is not as good as a delicately grilled succulent well seasoned piece of meat that has been carefully cooked over a glowing bed of charcoal! Mmmmmm good!)
…]
let us know when you have that quadruple bypass surgery so we can add you to mass intentions for healing. now stop baiting us and find a topic where you have something constructive or useful to say.
 
let us know when you have that quadruple bypass surgery so we can add you to mass intentions for healing. now stop baiting us and find a topic where you have something constructive or useful to say.
yeah, really funny you guys are! not. That has far more to do with genetics than with what someone eats.

My extended family’s history is excellent proof of that.
 
You know Marfran, I have been part of these forums for MANY years. I do not have “friends” on the forum either (what exactly is the point of that???) To be more “popular”? Let people be. Like I said earlier, those who put down meat eaters to make themselves appear “morally superior” are guilty of vanity, IMO. Let people be.
Those who put down meatfree people to make themselves appear “morally superior” are guilty of vanity. Let people be. Catholic90: I was not referring to you when I brought up the issue of friends. I brought it up because certain individuals in these discussions, NOT YOU, have made statements about how we should not spend time on animals and that we should only focus on people, and that we should only care about people and that **they **care about people, people, people, and they love people, people, people–yet these very people are not people-persons (as would be evidenced by having at least a friend or two–you don’t have to be popular to have a friend–you just have to care about people and extend your hand to them). So Catholic90–won’t you be my friend?? I am asking right out loud in public. I thought I already extended my hand to you. But I’ll do it again. I don’t just like animals. I like people too. And I even like people who behave like animals, NOT YOU C90. P.S. Catholic90: Legally YOU are my friend!!! Are you aware of that???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top