C
CesarAugustus
Guest
I see. Yes, it requires certain amount of work, and for some people, could be difficult to write. Good point with the expected romantic endings. I rather not write such stories. And with the current climate, less. Fans could be making fanarts or wirting fics of what-if scenarios, for fullfilling their lust and desire of such relationships. That happens for any production, though, but in this case they would have more fuel. It would be useful to search about this in traditional moral theology manuals to see if they touch these scenerios of story writing. Some manuals have all sorts of information.Well, I think the simple answer is not to normalize or glamorize it. If I were writing a story about two girls who fell in love, it would be from a Catholic perspective, and one or both of the girls would likely be Catholic or belong to another Christian denomination that did not condone homosexuality. They would have to struggle with what to do with their feelings. They would probably have to make sacrifices, and break off or not start the relationship in the first place. It would be a difficult story to tell, because we’re conditioned to believe that a happy ending requires romantic fulfillment. Not everyone gets that in real life, though, and that doesn’t mean they’re miserable. So it stands to reason that one can tell a story about a lesbian girl who does the right thing and does what is best for herself and the girl that she loves. Just because I’ve never seen it done doesn’t mean that it wouldn’t be a good story. It just has to be handled responsibly.
Yes.That’s a good way of drawing a line, provided the people discussing it understand healthy family dynamics.
They could avoid that, certainly. The problem is that blushing isn’t as defined as other visual cues they use. I have seen blushing used for shy people interacting with new friends, for people around their romantic interests, etc. That happens in real life too, but they could fin a way to make easy distinctions.I can see that. But I figure that if touching isn’t common in Japan, it shouldn’t be so common in media. And if it is, then it shouldn’t elicit extreme reactions. They can’t have it both ways.
Tari Tari, from 2012. Is like K-On! done right.Ooh, what are you watching?![]()
The series is about a choral school group, composed by three girls and two guys. I have watched 8 episodes. The only problematic content, are the beach scenes (although there is no sexy posing, clothing malfunction, etc) two bath scenes (no private parts shown), and similar stuff, . For me these weren’t a problem, but maybe these could be for another person.
Even the character designs are varied. The male characters don’t look androgynous, and not all girls are small like little girls.
The yuri baiting in male directed moe shows, is a recent phenomenom. Since the success of K-On! the model of four girls doing cute stuff became more popular, and four (or other number) girls doing yuri stuff became more popular too.I think the difference between moe and shonen is that most of the time, boys are still the core audience of yaoi-baiting shows, while the core audience of a true moe show is, as I understand it, always adult men. That’s true even when there isn’t much yuri-baiting; the innocence of the girls and the cuteness of the designs is meant to appeal to male viewers, not females.
Some series with cutesy character designs are being watched by women too.
The swimming anime from last year was some sort of experiment to have a fujoshi-baiting show for a mainstream public. But yaoi baiting shows have been around for long time. Clamp productions (they use yuri baiting too), some Shojo and Josei, and obviously, the shows that are about yaoi. Before 2009-2010, most yuri shows and manga were produced by females for a female audience mostly, I think. It was after the explosion of the moe trend in the late 2000’s early 2010’s that these began to appear in male oriented shows.Yaoi fandom is bigger and more active because most of what the fans want is produced in the fans themselves- fujoshi are going to spend a lot more time reading Naturo fanfic than watching the actual show. Whereas with moe and yuri, the producers center the show around the audience that wants that. Fandom doesn’t have to do much of anything, because the creators have already made it. So while fujoshi are a problem (and they’re a creepy problem), they don’t have the same level of backing from the shows themselves (most of the time). There’s a reason why Free! was so controversial, when shows with gender-swapped premises are a dime a dozen.
There are certains degrees of moral flaws in works.Basically, media that we consume always deserves to be discussed and critiqued. I agree that we should be very careful about such things. I’m just prone to finding flaws with many things, and I definitely don’t think that every moral flaw means we can’t watch something. I think we should be aware of the flaws and good points, and choose our media accordingly.
Escapism or fantasy is not bad per se, it depends of how is presented.Yes. We can use media to portray a better world, but using it to create a world where we get everything we want at the expense of everyone else is shallow, unhealthy, and bound to get old eventually. Miyazaki understands how to use fantasy and escapism for good, giving people fun worlds to explore while also bringing up challenges.![]()