S
SPONP4US
Guest
That’s a good point actually yes.
Of course not. That’s the purpose of dating - to get to know people in the right context. And by the way, I certainly wouldn’t ask any of these questions on the first date . . . or the first few dates, for that matter.Sure I would but its hard to know whether they are divorced, made a mistake (sex before marriage) and returned to the Church, or whether there was a Father to the child working late. Its not something you can just ask in polite conversation if you met them on the street, and even more so in the unlikely event they where in Church (like in the second instance).
I was referring to the lack of religious belief.what things? Beards or single mothers?
I believe the blogger is also in the UK as well.I completely agree, there is much more women in the Church than men. And as a consequence much more women available than men!
I didn’t mean to imply otherwise. I personally know people, men and women, in that age range who have very, very poor answers to the question “Why have you never been married” so I think the question is valid. I think your answer is fine and shows no warning signs. The question of why someone at 40 is unmarried is equally valid for men and women. I originally singled out women because the OP is a man and thus would be seeking women. If the OP was a woman I would suggest she also at some point bring up the topic if she meets a 40 year old never-married man.
Well, the next time someone asks a rude question like that to me, I’ll have the following in my “arsenal”:Yeah, I just always find the question is never delivered in a non-awkward or patronizing way. Even when asked lightheartedly it’s always kind of a downer. Like, what would be a good answer? I don’t think there is one.
I don’t think it change the sex ratio of the Church…I believe the blogger is also in the UK as well.
hey, wait a minute. our Visitor Authority litigates over variations on the slogan!Yes, I’ve been to Reno. What’s done in Reno stays in Reno.