R
R_not
Guest
I think that I have to say that ‘loving our enemy’ should not be confused with just blind acceptance of them having an idiology that says to kill, convert, or subjugate us with jihad being their primary duty and with jihadist tactics varying.Dear Brother,
I know what you are feeling, brother. But, for the sake of Jesus, whom you believe too, please calm down. Jesus teach us to love our “enemy” right. Let alone, Planten definitely is not our enemy. He just has not finished reading the new testament yet, so he missed the point that Jesus ordered us to love our enemy. When he reach the correct verse, he will understand because Jesus said so directly without any parables and without any need for further interpretation.
Perhaps, I suggest to use the word “Argue” rather than “Fight”. That should be a better word. From my earlier postings, you will know that how much I argue Paarsurrey, for example. But, between me and Paar, we respect and we like each other. Me and Planten, also had a strong argument before. But, after we understand each other better, me and Planten agreed to disagree, but we do this peacefully. I don’t want you to increase your blood pressure, brother.
I also think that if you look at morningstar’s history you will understand his insistence - he has lived under islam and knows it.
I will post this again because I think we should all read it:
sheikyermami.com/2008/05/13/serge-trifkovic-can-the-west-be-saved/
While we think that ‘loving our enemy’ means appeasement, not doing anything to stop the onslaught because it is indeed an onslaught of them working to impose their idiology on us, and being politically correct, etc - you might as well ask us to just sit down and die.
I work to not condemn my, or your, children to islam and so does morningstar.
