Archbishop: Obama Needs To Stop 'Intruding Into Internal Life Of Church'

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
POTUS FAIL
Here’s how the HHS mandate and the new “accommodation” work.
Then: All employers that don’t meet the narrow “religious exemption,” including Catholic hospitals and universities, are required by law to provide insurance coverage that includes contraception and sterilization procedures with no out of pocket costs cost to the insured.
Now: All employers that don’t meet the narrow “religious exemption,” including Catholic hospitals and universities, are required by law to provide insurance coverage. All such coverage must include contraception and sterilization procedures with no out of pocket costs cost to the insured.
You see the difference? No? Don’t worry, the smart people in government (the one’s sworn to protect your rights) say it’s all good…
Stephen P. White is a fellow in the Catholic Studies Program at the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C. and coordinator of the Tertio Millennio Seminar on the Free Society. The views expressed here are his own.
catholicvote.org/discuss/index.php?p=26499
 
WASHINGTON—The White House has support from a key Catholic health group on its compromise birth control policy.
Sister Carol Keehan heads the Catholic Health Organization. She says the compromise “has responded to the issues we identified that needed to be fixed.”
Senior administration officials tell The Associated Press the compromise policy says religious employers won’t have to cover birth control for their employees, after all.
Instead, insurance companies will be directly responsible for providing free contraception.
Keehan says the resolution “protects the religious liberty and conscience rights of Catholic institutions.”
And Planned Parenthood Federation of America says the approach “does not compromise a woman’s ability to access these critical birth control benefits.”
boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2012/02/10/catholic_group_backs_obama_birth_control_policy/
 
Sister Carol Keehan has supported ObamaCare, she has defended an abortion at St Joseph’s Hospital, a hospital under the Catholic Association of which is CEO and President of. That hospital’s Catholic status was revoked by Bishop Olmsted:

catholicnewsagency.com/news/catholic-health-association-defies-phoenix-bishop-over-abortion-case/

Sister Carol Keehan is the Catholic source that the media is going too to ask if this is mandate is now okay?
 
Monsignor Jim Lisante, NY, on Fox News: “Somehow or another we’re gonna fight this.”

Neil Cavuto on Fox News: Insurance companies not consulted before Obama announced they’d provide FREE contraception coverage.

How could Obama assume Insurance companies would okay this?
He’s just making it up as he goes along. He always does.
 
Nine state attorney generals now to fight HHS mandate:
Jon Bruning, Attorney General of Nebraska
Greg Abbott, Attorney General of Texas
Alan Wilson, Attorney General of South Carolina
Luther Strange, Attorney General of Alabama
Pam Bondi, Attorney General of Florida
James Caldwell, Attorney General of Louisiana
William Schneider, Attorney General of Maine
Wayne Stenehjem, Attorney General of North Dakota
Mike DeWine, Attorney General of Ohio
Scott Pruitt, Attorney General of Oklahoma

Make that ten:
Bill Schuette, Attorney General of Michigan
 
Family Research Council President Tony Perkins had the following to say:
“This revised HHS mandate does nothing to change the fundamentally anti-religious, anti-conscience and anti-life contraceptive mandate. It rather only creates some paperwork gimmicks that don’t change the fact that religious employers who object to coverage of these services will now have to drop health insurance altogether to maintain their conscience and face severe penalties for doing so,” he added. “This President is tone deaf to the very real religious and moral objections of millions of Americans. The so-called one year delay last month was a clear slap in the face of religious groups, and this new proposal still requires religious entities that are not exempt as a church to subsidize and pay insurance companies so they can give free birth control to their employees. However, it won’t be free, because the insurance companies will increase the premium and administrative costs to the employer.”
“This new gimmick forces religious entities to violate their religious beliefs and continues to show a complete disdain for the First Amendment. There is no compromise if a single American citizen is required to violate his or her conscience. Liberals say keep your morals out of the bedroom, yet the President’s plan forces everyone to pay the cost for someone else’s contraceptive use in the bedroom. That’s not freedom, it’s a mandate,” Perkins added.
Susan B. Anthony List president Marjorie Dannenfelser skewered Obama’s revised mandate, saying it “is unacceptable because it makes government the arbiter of individual conscience.”
“Forcing insurance companies to be directly responsible for providing abortion-inducing drugs and forcing religious organizations to cooperate is an assault on religious freedom,” she said. “Coverage for abortion-inducing drugs such as ella is not preventative women’s healthcare. This intrusion on rights of conscience by the Obama Administration claiming concern for ‘women’s rights or human rights’ puts dangerous ideology over liberty.”
'Who decides?’ used to be the slogan of the feminist movement advocating for a woman’s so-called right to choose,” Dannenfelser continued. “With this ‘compromise’, President Obama again asserts that it is the government who decides: government who decides what a properly formed conscience looks like, government who decides how to run a business, and government who determines how a religious nonprofit may act in the public square. Continuously putting abortion ideology ahead of religious freedom, now President Obama may also be forcing thousands of faith-based schools, hospitals and charities out of the public square entirely.”
Focus on the Family President Jim Daly added: “As an unapologetically, unswervingly pro-life organization, we disagree strongly with the Obama administration that free access to drugs that can cause abortions makes women or society healthier or safer.”
He said: “Today’s announcement seems to be an acknowledgement by the White House that it went too far in disregarding the deeply held values, and constitutionally protected conscience rights, of religious organizations and individuals. Still, we are not convinced this tweak to the proposed policy, when analyzed at a level deeper than simple sound bites, truly addresses the religious-liberty concerns that have been raised. There is a limit to what government can compel its citizens to do – and not do – particularly in matters of faith and freedom. It’s in the best interest of all Americans, of every ideological stripe, that it not be crossed. ”
Jonathan Imbody, Vice President for Government Relations for the Christian Medical Association, called the revisions “offering a distinction without a difference to mute opposition.”
He said the revision fits a pattern of contempt for conscience that includes how Obama “has gutted the only federal regulation protecting the exercise of conscience in health care, denied of federal grant funds for aiding human trafficking victims because a faith-based organization refused to participate in abortion; lobbied the Supreme Court to restrict faith-based organizations’ hiring rights; and issued a coercive contraceptive mandate that imposes the government’s abortion ideology on every American.”
lifenews.com/2012/02/10/pro-life-advocates-blast-revised-obama-pro-abortion-mandate/
 
Sebilius is on TV right now promoting Archbishop Dolan’s statement as POSITIVE.

:mad::mad:
 
Bishop Zubik of Pittsburg responds to ‘revised’ mandate

pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/video/6730724-bishop-zubik-responds-to-obama-compromise-on-birth-control/

** Bishop Thomas J. Tobin of Providence**

thericatholic.com/detail.html?sub_id=4762

Archbishop Gregory Aymond reacts to revamped birth control policy

fox8live.com/news/local/story/Archbishop-Gregory-Aymond-reacts-to-revamped/RNAOvsI08UulXP9TMx8Rqg.cspx

I have heard from 4 Bishops so far on the revised mandate, Bishop Zubik, Bishop Tobin, Bishop Greogry Aymond and Bishop Slattery - none of them have said the mandate goes far enough - religious freedom has still not been given.

If Obama, and the mainstream media thought Obama’s speech was enough to cool things down, they got it wrong. Catholics and other religious people are not going to compromise on religious freedom.
 
Obama Mandate to Cost Insurance Companies $2.8B, Raise Rates
Putting the moral and religious liberties concerns aside for one moment when it comes to the very controversial revised mandate the Obama administration issued today requiring insurance companies to cover birth control and drugs that may cause abortions, a cost component is coming into play.
As Tom McClusky, a vice president at the Family Research Council, notes, insurance companies will pay into the billions for coverage and will pass that on to consumers.
As for the President’s insistence this saves money, Blue Cross’s unofficial estimate was that it would cost $2.8 billion for the contraceptive/sterilization/abortifacient coverage, and $13 billion for all preventive care services. It would not be a huge jump in an average $4000 premium plan, about $13.00, but the overall cost is large.
Code:
Our Administration person basically said that whether fully insured or self-insured that the insurer is not going to eat the cost of the free contraceptives, so everyone’s premiums will still rise and the costs a religious employer pays “Blue Cross” or another insurance provider will increase to pay the difference.
Code:
As President Obama liked to say during the Obamacare debate insurance companies will want to make their profit, so they’ll increase rates somewhere. The religious employer will be directly paying the insurance company probably at increased cost, to provide the free contraceptives to the employee.
Code:
How bad is this? Pro-abortion groups like abortion giant Planned Parenthood opposed the religious exemption but support the “compromise” because now there are no exceptions. President Obama doesn’t seek compromise but confusion.  He isn’t looking for common ground on religious concerns but burial ground for the First Amendment
.

lifenews.com/2012/02/10/obama-mandate-to-cost-insurance-companies-2-8b-raise-rates/
 
Sister Carol Keehan has supported ObamaCare, she has defended an abortion at St Joseph’s Hospital, a hospital under the Catholic Association of which is CEO and President of. That hospital’s Catholic status was revoked by Bishop Olmsted:

catholicnewsagency.com/news/catholic-health-association-defies-phoenix-bishop-over-abortion-case/

Sister Carol Keehan is the Catholic source that the media is going too to ask if this is mandate is now okay?
Yes of course. You know when the MSM wants to denigrate Catholics (which is most of the time) they always trot out some renegade Religious or defrocked priest or CINO writer like James Carroll. They never seek out a strong and holy Catholic priest or Religious sister.

Sr Carol has her own set of rather shaky activities as you noted above. I hardly think she speaks for the majority of Catholics. Unfortunately most of the viewers of news shows think she’s another Mother Teresa.

Lisa
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top