Are those who do not receive Jesus in Holy Eucharist really Christians? Is it insanity for them to continue claiming to be Christians?

  • Thread starter Thread starter StMarina303ad
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Christ Jesus came to save all. Some people around the world have never heard of him…they have been raised up differently. Christ is still there for them and anytime they are living according to Gods will they are acting in a “Christ like” behavior.

The word Christian, like many words has evolved to a different meaning then it did back in the day. To me, a Christian can mean anyone who is living a good life. They might not know they are a Christian, but Christ Jesus is with them nonetheless.
One can live a christian life but not be a christian. Jesus loves all of us and watches thise who are not saved. Via the Great Commission, we have to touch their hearts and minds so the Holy Spirit can minister to them.
 
Rob - 2,000 Jesus rid us of religion, in ACTS the first believers were known as “followers of the way” later they were named Christians by pagans because they were “christ-like” then in 114AD Ignatious came up with the idea of “Catholic” which means the universal CHRISTIAN church. We are to follow the way the truth and the life, with no man made doctrine, but a heart after the Lord.

Oh and the holy eucharist was a full meal complete with fellowship, and if Jesus celebrated it as a meal and the disciples celebrated it as a meal than we would truly be doing it in the memory of him if we did it as a meal
Your knowledge of Church History is faulty.

The Apostles had already established 5 Patriarchates before they were all martyred (save John who died of old age) as well as established many, many other Churches with Bishops, Priests and Deacons (in India by St. Thomas, in Greece by St. Paul, etc.). Every early Christian, on the Lord’s Day, received Jesus in the Holy Eucharist within the Divine Liturgy of St. James which was shortened by St. Basil about 300 years later and within a century was shortened again by St. John Chrysostom. Many Orthodox Churches still use the Divine Liturgy of St. James on the anniversary of his martyrdom and the Divine Liturgy of St. Basil is used about 50% of the year during various Fasting seasons.

You should watch “The Ancient Church” or visit any # of those original 5 Patriarchate websites for more detailed information. Or better yet, go visit an Orthodox Christian Priest.
 
Anyone who acts in a Christ like behavior is a Christian.

All are saved.
No, anyone who obeys Christ (gets Baptized, Chrismated and receives Holy Eucharist, obeys the Commandments, etc.) is a Christian.

How on earth can anyone think that they are a follower of Christ if they fail to obey Him?

Makes no sense!
 
One can live a christian life but not be a christian. Jesus loves all of us and watches those who are not saved. Via the Great Commission, we have to touch their hearts and minds so the Holy Spirit can minister to them.
Touch there hearts and minds by prayer so that the Holy Spirit can help them live from there true self…the self Jesus died on the cross for. I believe it is possible that in the end of time everyones false self will be sent to hell and their true self will be sent to heaven. The split would be more painful for those who live mostly from there false self.

Is it wrong for me to think of this as a possiblility?

I am sorry for being somewhat off the topic.
 
Rob,
You are, of course, welcome to your opinion. And remember, there are some who say that you, as a Catholic, are not Christian. I say you are both wrong.

But I ask you, specifically, how do you reconcile your opinion with the following:

CCC

Jon
Jon what you quoted is the true teaching’s of the RCC.
 
Can protestants even be part of the Communion, i.e. the Body of Christ?

St. Paul teaches:
1 Corinthians 10:16 The chalice of benediction, which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? And the bread, which we break, is it not the partaking of the body of the Lord? 17 For we, being many, are one bread, one body, all that partake of one bread.

The Holy Eucharist is what constitutes the mystical Body of Christ being the Communion of the true believers, Christians. How can one claim to be part of Jesus while not partaking in this one bread, which is the body of the Lord???

Why would St. Paul write this if the bread was nothing but bread?
1 Corinthians 11:26 For as often as you shall eat this bread, and drink the chalice, you shall show the death of the Lord, until he come. 27 Therefore whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord.
 
Can protestants even be part of the Communion, i.e. the Body of Christ?

St. Paul teaches:
1 Corinthians 10:16 The chalice of benediction, which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? And the bread, which we break, is it not the partaking of the body of the Lord? 17 For we, being many, are one bread, one body, all that partake of one bread.

The Holy Eucharist is what constitutes the mystical Body of Christ being the Communion of the true believers, Christians. How can one claim to be part of Jesus while not partaking in this one bread, which is the body of the Lord???

Why would St. Paul write this if the bread was nothing but bread?
1 Corinthians 11:26 For as often as you shall eat this bread, and drink the chalice, you shall show the death of the Lord, until he come. 27 Therefore whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord.
What I was taught is that they are indeed Christians they have excepted Jesus Christ and have been baptised in the Name of the Father Son and Holy Spirit. To receive communion they must take classes and finish the sacraments after Baptism. But if they were to become Catholic they would not have to be baptised again because their Babtism is valid by the RCC which makes them Christians. But they do not have the fullness of the faith, but again since they are baptised they have received the same Grace we have received. The Grace of Jesus Christ which would make them Christians.
 
**I went and read it myself. I have to admit that: “I was in error”.😊 **I could say that I miss read the OP but I didn’t.

freesmileys.org/smileys/signs139.gif

It is just that I have such a deep love for the Eucharist myself, that sometimes I forget that there are “christians” who won’t ever obtain Eternal Life because they have not eaten the body and blood of Christ as He commanded! I read more into the question than was actually there. I stand corrected!

[SIGN]John 6:53-56 RSV) So Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him.[/SIGN]

“Are those who do not receive Jesus in Holy Eucharist really Christians?” ALMOST, because you have to follow Jesus’ commandments to be fully a Christian!"Is it insanity for them to continue claiming to be Christians?"No, only to refuse to become Catholic and enjoy the fulliness and eternal Life promised by Jesus!

**Thanks for correcting me, I feel much better now.👍 It happens. I am only a humble follower of Christ! 😃 **
All of us err, especially me. Blessings to you.
Jon
 
What I was taught is that they are indeed Christians they have excepted Jesus Christ and have been baptised in the Name of the Father Son and Holy Spirit. To receive communion they must take classes and finish the sacraments after Baptism. But if they were to become Catholic they would not have to be baptised again because their Babtism is valid by the RCC which makes them Christians. But they do not have the fullness of the faith, but again since they are baptised they have received the same Grace we have received. The Grace of Jesus Christ which would make them Christians.
**Hi rinnie, correct to a point. There are some baptisms that are not accepted as valid because of form. “Most” are. As they say "Once a Christian, always a christian. Baptism, confirmation and Holy Order are the three sacraments that can only be received once because they leave an indelible mark on the person’s soul. In case of doubt about whether a person has received one of these three sacraments, the sacrament may be administered conditionally. Being a christian doesn’t mean that the person will receive eternal life! The Eucharist does if we can believe Jesus!

[SIGN]

ETERNAL LIFE AVAILABLE
John 6:53-56 RSV) So Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him.
[/SIGN] **

freesmileys.org/smileys/bounce014.gif freesmileys.org/smileys/bounce014.giffreesmileys.org/smileys/bounce014.gif
 
Your knowledge of Church History is faulty.

The Apostles had already established 5 Patriarchates before they were all martyred (save John who died of old age) as well as established many, many other Churches with Bishops, Priests and Deacons (in India by St. Thomas, in Greece by St. Paul, etc.). Every early Christian, on the Lord’s Day, received Jesus in the Holy Eucharist within the Divine Liturgy of St. James which was shortened by St. Basil about 300 years later and within a century was shortened again by St. John Chrysostom. Many Orthodox Churches still use the Divine Liturgy of St. James on the anniversary of his martyrdom and the Divine Liturgy of St. Basil is used about 50% of the year during various Fasting seasons.

You should watch “The Ancient Church” or visit any # of those original 5 Patriarchate websites for more detailed information. Or better yet, go visit an Orthodox Christian Priest.
You still havent realized what the Eucharist is have you? Read the Gospels, not your doctrine and you will see what Eucharist really is, do you realize every celebration was done as a feast, in fact this was done during a feast. I like how you brought up the divine liturgies, I wonder how you got divine liturgies from Thomas, or Basil, or John of Chrysostom out of the Bible.
As for what I said being faulty, prove it. Why dont you do a little search for yourself?
 
**Hi rinnie, correct to a point. There are some baptisms that are not accepted as valid because of form. “Most” are. As they say "Once a Christian, always a christian. Baptism, confirmation and Holy Order are the three sacraments that can only be received once because they leave an indelible mark on the person’s soul. In case of doubt about whether a person has received one of these three sacraments, the sacrament may be administered conditionally. Being a christian doesn’t mean that the person will receive eternal life! The Eucharist does if we can believe Jesus!

[SIGN] **

ETERNAL LIFE AVAILABLE
John 6:53-56 RSV) So Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him.
[/SIGN]

freesmileys.org/smileys/bounce014.gif freesmileys.org/smileys/bounce014.giffreesmileys.org/smileys/bounce014.gif
Who are you to say that a protestant baptism is not good enough - our priest in RCIA does not say this or anything close to it. I will not have the “fullness of the faith”…?!

I was baptised as protestant - as a baby - given no “spiritual” instruction until I listened to the baptists - heard wonderfully inspired preaching and got baptised again - immersion as an adult - and then appreciated it and understood in more…

I go to RCIA and find that it seems that many cathlolics use this as “an instruction book” instead of “an inspiration book” Your catechism is very very deep and moving - no wonder the Church uses the sacred traditiions as a basis for the faith. But you must view the christian ideals and faith - which came before the Council of Trent in a spiritual and less dogmatic way.

So I guess we have the “chartered” members" (born and baptised catholics) and the “associate” members (converts)? Ridiculous!
I guess you are going to imply that salvation is pased by blood and not spirit…
 
You still havent realized what the Eucharist is have you? Read the Gospels, not your doctrine and you will see what Eucharist really is, do you realize every celebration was done as a feast, in fact this was done during a feast.

You are right the Celebration of Holy Eucharist (goarch.org/ourfaith/ourfaith7077) is done during a Feast…the Feast of the Resurrection - celebrated at Pascha (Easter) (goarch.org/ourfaith/ourfaith7050) followed by the Agape Meal once a year (goarch.org/ourfaith/ourfaith8123) and also celebrated on a smaller scale as a Mini-Pascha every Sunday followed by a mini-luncheon or at the very least a coffee hour. It’s also celebrated on various Feast Days through out the Year (goarch.org/ourfaith/ourfaith7070 & goarch.org/ourfaith/ourfaith8713)).

I like how you brought up the divine liturgies, I wonder how you got divine liturgies from Thomas, or Basil, or John of Chrysostom out of the Bible.

Thre is no Divine Liturgy of St. Thomas. There is a Divine Liturgy of St. James the Apostle, a Divine Liturgy of St. Basil and a Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom. goarch.org/ourfaith/ourfaith7117 goarch.org/ourfaith/ourfaith7119

Divine Liturgy simply means the “Work of the People for God”.

The word “Liturgy” is all over the New Testament. Most English translations of the original Greek translate it as “work” or “work of the people” so it easy to see how you who are not fluent in Greek could miss such a thing which is so abundantly found through out Sacred Scripture/Holy Bible.

Why dont you do a little search for yourself?

I’ve done more than 7 years of research.

It’s time now for you to get started. Begin with prayer and then study.

I have attached several links to help you get started - easy to read and digest. Once you get your feet wet so to speak, then I can refer you to various writings/books and the like, but I don’t want to overwhelm you all at once.

May God bless you in your journey. Your heart will find it’s home in Orthodoxy.
 
40.png
StMarina303ad:
Very interesting = set me down the path with your books…
 
**Hi rinnie, correct to a point. There are some baptisms that are not accepted as valid because of form. “Most” are. As they say "Once a Christian, always a christian. Baptism, confirmation and Holy Order are the three sacraments that can only be received once because they leave an indelible mark on the person’s soul. In case of doubt about whether a person has received one of these three sacraments, the sacrament may be administered conditionally. Being a christian doesn’t mean that the person will receive eternal life! The Eucharist does if we can believe Jesus!

[SIGN] **

ETERNAL LIFE AVAILABLE
John 6:53-56 RSV) So Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him.
[/SIGN]

freesmileys.org/smileys/bounce014.gif freesmileys.org/smileys/bounce014.giffreesmileys.org/smileys/bounce014.gif
Oh I agree completely, but remember what the Pope said, not all have the fullness of the truth revealed to them. We know the truth and cannot turn our back on it. But not all have had the honor of understanding what we do. It is through our faith that it is revealed.
 
TO STMarina
40.png
StMarina303ad:
I myself have been studying for 7 years, its just a number.

Im not questioning your intellegence, nor am I questioning any liturgys, in fact im not interested in liturgies.

What am interested in, is the eucharist not a part of a feast? you’ve already stated yourself that it is the feast of the ressurection. Then why is it not celebrated that way? Did it not change into a bread chip and a sip out of a cup? Why is it now that? Are we truly remembering Jesus by doing it differently than his way?

And I apologise that we little people are unable to speak greek like you.
 
Who are you to say that a protestant baptism is not good enough - our priest in RCIA does not say this or anything close to it. I will not have the “fullness of the faith”…?!

**
Hi Brownjt. How are you?👋

Don’t attack! I did not say that**! What I actually did say was a “direct quote” from the CCC. The Catholic Church said it, and YOU misunderstood what was said! Reread it! Just because a priest in RCIA didn’t teach you that “some” Protestant baptisms aren’t considered valid might have been because no one asked him the question, and by everyones previous denomination he know the baptisms was valid? The church’s decision makes them valid!

**Do you realize, some Protestant denominations rebaptize everyone!. **Catholics never do that unless there is some reason to believe that the original baptism was invalid due to form or some other factor. We believe in “one” baptism for the forgiveness of sins.

I was baptised as protestant - as a baby - given no “spiritual” instruction until I listened to the baptists - heard wonderfully inspired preaching and got baptised again - immersion as an adult - and then appreciated it and understood in more…

**
Your second baptism that you had was unnecessary **because you had no more “original sin” Baptism isn’t the correct sacrament for forgiveness of other sins that would be confession. You said that you “had a better appreciation and understood more” That means it gave you a “real nice feeling”. So what? 🤷 Your original sin had been forgiven as a baby.
Now you misread what I wrote attacking me but you didn’t object to your second baptism? Are you taking medications? Have you thought about checking to see if you might not need them?🙂

**
Even when a Baptism is redone by the Catholic church it is “conditionally” redone, with special wording.This is exactly what I quoted:
“Once a Christian, always a christian. Baptism, confirmation and Holy Order are the three sacraments that can only be received once** because they leave an indelible mark on the person’s soul. In case of doubt about whether a person has received one of these three sacraments, the sacrament may be administered conditionally”

I go to RCIA and find that it seems that many cathlolics use this as “an instruction book” instead of “an inspiration book” Your catechism is very very deep and moving - no wonder the Church uses the sacred traditiions as a basis for the faith.

We do it because Jesus told His church to do that! We only do what God tells us to do! We don’t just make our own rules like protestant denominations do! We follow Jesus!

But you must view the christian ideals and faith - which came before the Council of Trent in a spiritual and less dogmatic way.

**
Who gave you the authority to say that? Where in the CCC does it say that? You are wrong! Who are you to say that? I say we must read it in a “dogmatic way” because that is exactly what it is! It is a dogma! We are not Protestants we are the “real” DOGMATIC church established by Jesus 2,000 years ago. In RCIA, you should be learning about the religion not trying to teach Power Catholics, who are “correctly” interpreting the teachings, what you think is correct with out knowledge to back it up. We quote Church teachings. We do not changing their interpretation to fit our previous thinking of Jesus and his church…**

So I guess we have the “chartered” members" (born and baptised catholics) and the “associate” members (converts)?

No we only have Catholics. Smart ones and Dumb ones, Educated and Ignorant ones, Nice ones and Arragant ones, Loving ones, and Hateful ones, Saved ones and Damned ones. Yup! Catholics are like every other human on the face of the earth. Humans attempting to follow God’s will. The secret is We are trying to follow the correct path that Jesus taught us. We have the HS to guide the Church and we have the church to teach us. Some of us just don’t know what the Church teaches but that can be taught.

Ridiculous!

**Yes you were but I forgive you! That is the christian thing to do! :whistle: **

I guess you are going to imply that salvation is pased by blood and not spirit…

**I will not imply that. I will tell you exactly what Jesus said OK? **
**
Jesus said, “Very truly, I tell you, **unless you ****eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. **Those who **eat my flesh and **drink my blood **have eternal life, and I will raise them up on the last day; for my flesh is true food and my blood is true drink. Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood abide in me, and I in them. Just as the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so whoever eats me will live because of me. This is the bread that came down from heaven, not like that which your ancestors ate, and they died. But the one who eats this bread will live forever.” He said these things while he was teaching in the synagogue at Capernaum. - John 6 53-59:highprayer: **
So I wont imply it I will tell you Salvation is passed by blood. The blood of our Lord and savior. Jesus Christ

you are in my prayers!:signofcross:

**

.
 
40.png
RobGentner:
It is alos passed by the Advocate - the Holy Spirit as well!
 
40.png
RobGentner:
In response I will leave at this: There are many ways up a mountain - some are easier than others. Some trails are well-marked and other are not. Jesus said “I am the Way, the narrow path to salvation”. The path is tough and not so clear sometimes. So even if Jesus said though me the door is open, the devil and our sloth and free will and circumstances of life may it difficult at times to know “are we going the right way?” Where are the landmarks - the reference points?" to the top.

The Catholic faith is a difficult way to go - it is not for the “faint of faith” But - the catholic faith provides rest and guide posts, wine and bread of the Risen Christ along the way to the top for sustenance and inspiration. These I believe are the Seven Sacraments administered by the faith. The view from the top fells better when it has been accomplished under difficult hike.

There ARE other ways to go as a Christian - but the Catholic faith provides the best “lamp unto our feet” to get to the “City on the Hill”. God Bless You as Well. I want to know that I will make it.
 
TO STMarina

What am interested in, is the eucharist not a part of a feast? Yes it is. you’ve already stated yourself that it is the feast of the ressurection. Then why is it not celebrated that way? It is. Haven’t you ever visited an Orthodox Divine Liturgy? It is and always has been a celebration. Eastern Catholics also celebrate it as a celebration.
Did it not change into a bread chip and a sip out of a cup? Again, this shows you’ve never been to an Orthodox Divine Liturgy (or an Eastern Catholic one for that matter)…Holy Eucharist is made from bread, not an unleavened chip and only the priest drinks from the cup…The Body and Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ is combined in the Chalice and given to each of us laity on a gold spoon - each of us receive at the same time the Body and the Blood. It is not separately given as is done only in the Roman Catholic Church. The rest of the “feasting” comes after Divine Liturgy…Agape Meal once a year on Pascha and in the form of either a full luncheon or a simply coffee (& donut) hour after Divine Liturgy.
Why is it now that? Why do the Roman Catholics do it differently from the rest of the Ancient Christian Orthodox world? I don’t know. Ask a Catholic. Are we truly remembering Jesus by doing it differently than his way? We who are Orthodox are doing it in the same manner as Jesus instructed the Apostles to do it and the way those same Apostles taught the rest of the Bishops and Priests to do it and they have all handed it down generation after generation the same way.

Protestants: Perhaps you are confused, thinking that the Bible was written as an instruction manual of how to operate the Church, but it wasn’t. It was written by the Church for Christians as a part of the Christian Tradition (the written part - as Tradition has been handed down both orally and in written form) for their spiritual growth and enlightenment to be read in the Liturgies: Vespers, Compline, Pre-Sanctified Liturgy and Divine Liturgy and well as during the 7 Hours of Prayer (Liturgy of the Hours) for us, laity which was later also practiced to a greater degree by monks and nuns.

To separate the Church and the Churches Liturgical Services from the Bible is crazy because the Bible came from the Greek Orthodox Church (written in Greek originally). *The Orthodox Church existed before the Bible was written down *and would have continued to exist even if had it never be written down and later compiled.

The Orthodox Church felt we ought to have the New Testament, so it reviewed the various writing of the Apostles and others and in Council led by the Holy Spirit the Church determined which of these writings would be considered a part of Sacred Scripture aka the Bible.
 
I apologize I did not realize that you were not catholic, this message was for catholics, since I was once one and have done most of my research on it.

One thing I did find interesting that you said was that the bible was greek. The new testament mostly, but dont forget aramaic and hebrew. The old testament is a larger text and is hebrew.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top