At any rate, you are unable to substantiate that I made a false accusation against you. You owe me an apology.
I am not that naive.
You may not know that within Catholic Answers membership are excellent researchers who are knowledgeable on a variety and spectrum of interest and issues, especially on Catholic issues and what the Vatican has said or did not say on any given subject! So, please don’t assume that CAF membership is like the membership in other Internet sites.
We know the Church is very careful with its pronouncements. She is also respectful, at times too respectful, as for instance her regard for the social and behavioral sciences, i.e., psychiatry and psychology. When homosexuality was considered a mental illness and so called experts in the fields believed it could be cured, the Church turned to such experts in said disciplines to help solve the clergy sex abuse problem and the problem with homosexual priests. At the same time that efforts to rehabilitate were being undertaken, the Church practiced what it preached, mercy and forgiveness for repented sins of homosexual and pedophile priests. Well, the scandal was contained long enough and when it exploded, the consequence to the Church, in particular the erosion of her moral authority was truly staggering.
Transitioning from male to female is such a burning issue for you personally that you are assuming things about the Church for conceivably the wrong reasons and making projections. Of course, the Church will be fully aligned with its teaching on mercy. Your inclusion and certitude about tolerance and acceptance in certain situations are based on wishful thinking, however.
The problem with your stream of arguments is that you are taking cover with the affliction that people with CAIS and 5 alpha reductase deficiency have, conditions so rare even within the transgender category, when you don’t have the condition. You seem to use it, disingenuously, I would say, to justify transitioning and SRS. You call your general trans issue as a medical condition when it is arguably not. And then you go all over the place with untrue and inapplicable claims of hatred for trans individuals by certain posters in this forum, that the Church would allow trans marriage (you ardently hope!).
Finally, your example that the Church would / could nullify a marriage if a spouse realizes he/she is forced to transition is so far out, so ridiculous to be true. First of all, annulments are done on request by parties to a Catholic marriage. A marriage would qualify for nullity, for that matter, if there is material fraud or dishonesty after the fact, that is discovered in going into the marriage, which is expected to be unitive and procreative. The likely scenario with discovery and/or unresolved homo/bisexual/transgender … problems of a spouse in a marriage is that the couple will divorce. Unless the straight spouse is hoping to marry in the Church to another (of the opposite sex of course!) annulment would likely not come up. And when it does, a petition is filed, the outcome of nullity is welcomed, not that the Church would hand down a judgment on its own to partners who would be unwilling to separate.