Assurance of Salvation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oumashta
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi, OldProf, …

And, since Christ and the Scripture Writers tell us this - there is a promise of salavation if we actually DO as God directs. Note this is quite different from saying, "I’m one of the Elect, I am one of the Sheep because St. Paul says I am a New Creation. I have salvation because I believe in Christ. And, this is where I put my belief in my ‘assurance of salvation’. The Scriptural rebuttal for this is really something that Calin knew but simply could not believe (he really did lack Faith - and wanted to be ‘assured’ - so, he came up with this approach to ease his mind. Now, he does not have to DO anything because it has aleady been done by Christ.)

Matthew 7:21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven.”

And, then combine this with: Matt 7:22-23: “Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name? Did we not drive out demons in your name? Did we not do mighty deeds in your name?’ Then I will declare to them solemnly, ‘I never knew you. Depart from me, you evildoers.’”

Now, just role those ideas around for a bit - and we see people who have been saying, “Lord, Lord”, we see people who really did, “…prophesy in your name…” and really, “driving out demons” in the name of Christ not something easily overlooked. But, it does not stop there - here we also have these people doing, ‘…might deeds…’ admittedly not very specific - but, the impression I have is that these ‘mighty deeds’ would get anyone’s attention. Ah, but you know there is not even a hint of Calvin’s ‘AoS’ misapplied doctrine.

…God bless
It is interesting what you say here, because you have perhaps missed a MAJOR point of this Matt 7 passage. You begin by saying, basically, that we (Christian’s) need to persevere, keep the commandments, run the good race, etc. Yes, Christian’s are to be obedient. The elect WILL do that or else, as James says, their faith is dead (not genuine), so they prove they really aren’t “the elect” at all. But, as Paul says, “For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.” (Eph 2:10) The true Christian will do good works not for his own glory, but the bring glory to God. They are not done to gain salvation, but as evidence of salvation.

These same ideas are covered in Evidence Lists 1 and 2, reposted on 17 Oct 12.

Assurance could be true, but could also be a false indicator, so it is in Evidence List 1.
Obedience is a good indicator of true faith, so it is in Evidence List 2.

Per Matt 7:21 doing good works is of course the will of the Father. But notice in Matt 7:23 Jesus says, “I never knew you.” Here we have this professing “Christian” who has assurance because of all his/her good works done in the name of their “Lord” but the truth is that Jesus never knew them. This very much fits the idea that Jesus sheep are those he knows as the metaphor suggests in John 10, where the sheep are the elect that will never perish (John 10:28), and those who, like the Jews in John 10, are NOT among His sheep (“but you do not believe because you are not among my sheep” John 10:26).

The major point seems to be the word “never.”

The sheep “never” perish (John 10:28).
The professing Christian with lots of “works” Jesus “never” knew (Matt 7:23).

The “Christian” who leaves the congregation was never really a part of it. (1 John 2:19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us. But they went out, that it might become plain that they all are not of us.)

These ideas do seem to fit OSAS doctrine. And those never saved were never known by Christ.

More to come to finish the response to this post.

Regards, OldProf
 
Tom, to repeat post #651/652 what about the context of this verse:

I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God that you may know that you have eternal life. 1 John 5:13

Has this ever been addressed by you? If so, when and I’ll take that into account on my response. If not, please address this verse since it is a main AoS verse.

1 John 5:13 is a primary AoS verse that I do not recall seeing addressed. Tom, can you address it? Did I miss something?

It seems that somehow you keep forgetting about this verse.

Thanks, OldProf
 
Hi, OldProf,

I am growing both older and more weary. I no longer see this as my failure at clear communications. I think some effort at clear understanding needs to be demonstrated.

For example - I took your lengthy post and divided it into two unequal parts:

1.) Mark 12 where Christ explains to the Teacher of the Law what must be done for salvation - and the Teacher understood and repeated it back to Christ. And, Christ noted the sincerity of this man and told him he was not far from the Kingdom!

2.) All these other and most numerous Scripture Quotes trying to prove Christ was wrong! :eek:

No one can have it both ways - either you believe Christ’s words or you don’t. You just can’t believe some of them and reject others that don’t fit Calvin’s ‘AoS’. My suggestion is that you not only embrace Mark 12 - but, in your eagerness to search the Scriptures you will find much support for Christ’s words of salvation - and no words that claim, “I’m saved and you’re not!” :eek:

God bless
Please make a Scriptural argument or show specifics where you think I have contradicted Jesus. I took the time to provide you with a cohesive scriptural argument, please have the courtesy to be specific in your response. If I’m wrong, great, show me where.

Sincerely, OldProf
 
OldProf,

This is indeed tragic. Simply because a deluge of Scripture was not used does not mean none was used. My post was really not that long - I really do not know how what I said could be misunderstood.

In Mark 12 Christ identifies what the greatest and second greatest commandment - both require one to WORK, to DO, the Commands of God to be saved. And, note, even though the Jewish Teacher of the Law understood what Christ had said - he still has to obey these Commands. Nowhere does Christ tell this guy “You are the Elect” - what He says is, “You are not far from the Kingdom of God”. Now here is the ‘Scripture’ argument you asked for:

All of the quotes you gave were misapplied because you attempted to refute what Christ said - that is the Scripture you need to address - that is where you are wrong - and that is what you continue to run around with while ignoring everything else you have been told that refutes ‘AoS’ and it companion heresy OSAS.

There really are Elect - and God knows who they are. So, as I see it, you are half right. The error comes in with the way Calvin - and by extension all who have bought into his delusion of assurance - claims he KNOWS he is saved. While I am partial to Matthew, there are many other quotes where Christ says just the opposite:

Matt. 7:1-3 - We are judged according to how we responded to God’s grace during our lives.

Matt. 10:22, Matt 24:13; Jesus taught that we must endure to the very end to be saved. If salvation occurred at a specific point in time when we accepted Jesus as personal Lord and Savior, there would be no need to endure to the end. We would already be saved.

Matt. 16:27 – Jesus says He will repay every man for what he has done (WORKS).

Matt. 25:31-46 - Jesus’ teaching on the separation of the sheep from the goats is based on the WORKS that were done during their lives, not just on their acceptance of Christ as Savior.

Matt. 25- We are judged and our eternal destiny is determined in accordance with our WORKS

The promise of Salvation is for those who persevere until the end, do the works of God because they believe in Him - and all of this is possible because of the Grace of God. You know, Matt 25 - the entire chapter is devoted to identifying that ultimately none of the damned knew they were damned - they all thought they were the Elect. They, too, thought they had knowledge - but, it was to their folly. And here we finally come to 1John 5

We indeed know we have eternal life - IF AND ONLY IF we follow Christ’s Commands. Now, you have repeated left that concept out - because it does not appear in 1John 5 - but does appear throughout Scripture. And, that is the problem with the way isolated quotes can be used - claiming this while hoping no one brings up the context in which all of this take place in.

God bless
Please make a Scriptural argument or show specifics where you think I have contradicted Jesus. I took the time to provide you with a cohesive scriptural argument, please have the courtesy to be specific in your response. If I’m wrong, great, show me where.

Sincerely, OldProf
 
OldProf,

In a previous post, you made a selective quote from 1John 5 - actually beginning your ‘proof’ at v 13. I think you should know that the previous 12 verses in 1John 5 do not support your interpretation. Let’s look at the text:

1 Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ is begotten by God, and everyone who loves the father loves [also] the one begotten by him 2In this way we know that we love the children of God when we love God and obey his commandments. 3For the love of God is this, that we keep his commandments. And his commandments are not burdensome,4 for whoever is begotten by God conquers the world. And the victory that conquers the world is our faith. 5Who [indeed] is the victor over the world but the one who believes that Jesus is the Son of God?

6This is the one who came through water and blood, Jesus Christ, not by water alone, but by water and blood. The Spirit is the one that testifies, and the Spirit is truth. 7So there are three that testify, 8the Spirit, the water, and the blood, and the three are of one accord.f 9If we accept human testimony, the testimony of God is surely greater. Now the testimony of God is this, that he has testified on behalf of his Son. 10Whoever believes in the Son of God has this testimony within himself. Whoever does not believe God has made him a liar by not believing the testimony God has given about his Son.h 11And this is the testimony: God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.i 12Whoever possesses the Son has life; whoever does not possess the Son of God does not have life.
13I write these things to you so that you may know that you have eternal life, you who believe in the name of the Son of God.

The highlighted sections in these first 12 verses tell us that if we love Christ we will be keeping His Commands. Simply cutting out these verses and waiving v13 around like ‘This is it!’ simply has missed the point.

Now, we both are of the opinion that neither of us understands the written word of God. You seem to think that I do not understand Matt 7. Fine. How about some evidence? On another thread I challenged anyone who did not believe in the Real Presence as contained in John 6 to simply write a 100 word (max) summary of the Chapter. This is honestly to read what is written and reduce this chapter to no more then 100 words. I think just demonstrating that one has a comprehension for what is actually there - before coming up with doctrinal material is a good first step to demonstrating understanding. This requires no more ability then a average 6th grader would have in demonstrating reading comprehension. Are you up for this challenge, OldProf? Just give me a summary whenever you wish - and, I will show you my summary of Matt 7. Placing them side by side, it will be quite easy to determine if there is an understanding for what is actually written.

God bless
It is interesting what you say here, because you have perhaps missed a MAJOR point of this Matt 7 passage.
 
OldProf,

In a previous post, you made a selective quote from 1John 5 - actually beginning your ‘proof’ at v 13. I think you should know that the previous 12 verses in 1John 5 do not support your interpretation. Let’s look at the text:

1 Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ is begotten by God, and everyone who loves the father loves [also] the one begotten by him 2In this way we know that we love the children of God when we love God and obey his commandments. 3For the love of God is this, that we keep his commandments. And his commandments are not burdensome,4 for whoever is begotten by God conquers the world. And the victory that conquers the world is our faith. 5Who [indeed] is the victor over the world but the one who believes that Jesus is the Son of God?

6This is the one who came through water and blood, Jesus Christ, not by water alone, but by water and blood. The Spirit is the one that testifies, and the Spirit is truth. 7So there are three that testify, 8the Spirit, the water, and the blood, and the three are of one accord.f 9If we accept human testimony, the testimony of God is surely greater. Now the testimony of God is this, that he has testified on behalf of his Son. 10Whoever believes in the Son of God has this testimony within himself. Whoever does not believe God has made him a liar by not believing the testimony God has given about his Son.h 11And this is the testimony: God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.i 12Whoever possesses the Son has life; whoever does not possess the Son of God does not have life.
13I write these things to you so that you may know that you have eternal life, you who believe in the name of the Son of God.

The highlighted sections in these first 12 verses tell us that if we love Christ we will be keeping His Commands. Simply cutting out these verses and waiving v13 around like ‘This is it!’ simply has missed the point.

Now, we both are of the opinion that neither of us understands the written word of God. You seem to think that I do not understand Matt 7. Fine. How about some evidence? On another thread I challenged anyone who did not believe in the Real Presence as contained in John 6 to simply write a 100 word (max) summary of the Chapter. This is honestly to read what is written and reduce this chapter to no more then 100 words. I think just demonstrating that one has a comprehension for what is actually there - before coming up with doctrinal material is a good first step to demonstrating understanding. This requires no more ability then a average 6th grader would have in demonstrating reading comprehension. Are you up for this challenge, OldProf? Just give me a summary whenever you wish - and, I will show you my summary of Matt 7. Placing them side by side, it will be quite easy to determine if there is an understanding for what is actually written.

God bless
it seems he jumped those verses! Can we say we even know the son if we dont do as he says? With faith must come the “obedience of faith”, i noticed this theme in some of st paul’s letter. In some places paul exchanges “faith” and “obedience of faith” as though they mean the same thing.
I just can’t see an absolute assurance of salvation there.
 
It is interesting what you say here, because you have perhaps missed a MAJOR point of this Matt 7 passage. You begin by saying, basically, that we (Christian’s) need to persevere, keep the commandments, run the good race, etc. Yes, Christian’s are to be obedient. The elect WILL do that or else, as James says, their faith is dead (not genuine), so they prove they really aren’t “the elect” at all. But, as Paul says, “For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.” (Eph 2:10) The true Christian will do good works not for his own glory, but the bring glory to God. They are not done to gain salvation, but as evidence of salvation.
Have you become some kind of holy spirit that you presume to know God’s elect?
These same ideas are covered in Evidence Lists 1 and 2, reposted on 17 Oct 12.
Assurance could be true, but could also be a false indicator, so it is in Evidence List 1.
Obedience is a good indicator of true faith, so it is in Evidence List 2.
Per Matt 7:21 doing good works is of course the will of the Father. But notice in Matt 7:23 Jesus says, “I never knew you.” Here we have this professing “Christian” who has assurance because of all his/her good works done in the name of their “Lord” but the truth is that Jesus never knew them. This very much fits the idea that Jesus sheep are those he knows as the metaphor suggests in John 10, where the sheep are the elect that will never perish (John 10:28), and those who, like the Jews in John 10, are NOT among His sheep (“but you do not believe because you are not among my sheep” John 10:26).
The major point seems to be the word “never.”
the ironic point is that he never knew them, even though they preached, prophesied and healed in his name. Do u preach and prophesy in a name u dont believe?? Those guy believed in christ and even had their healings to prove it but christ say “i know u not”.
They were so sure that they believed and prophesied in his name yet their “assurance” never became salvation.
The sheep “never” perish (John 10:28).
The professing Christian with lots of “works” Jesus “never” knew (Matt 7:23).
The “Christian” who leaves the congregation was never really a part of it. (1 John 2:19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us. But they went out, that it might become plain that they all are not of us.)
i though u said judas was a real believer how come christ says he was “headed for distruction” and yet u claim a real believer doesn’t can’t leave the fold. Really??
These ideas do seem to fit OSAS doctrine. And those never saved were never known by Christ.
so they were all preaching and prophesying in a name they didnt believe? Your theology claims u are saved one u believe and now somehow those wu believed and even prophesied were never saved.
Something is terribly wrong with this picture.
Peace
 
appointed,

God opened her heart, i will like to add jn16:8, it shows another work of God to convince. In all these verse God aids the sinner, first he had already appointed him, he opens his heart and lastly convinces him. It is in in line with these passages that the council of trent talks of a “predisposing grace” to help man “assent” to the truth of God. That is why the council of trent identifies God’s grace in our justification lam 5:21 and also our assent to grace zach 1:3. He it is who converts us and we in turn must turn to him, if not i don’t see any justification. Acts 2 shows the picture, thru d work of the holy spirit they were “cut to the heart” act2:37, and they responded by asking d next step and doing it, that is why acts2:41 says “those who recieved the word were baptised” the word has to be recieved. It can also be rejected and only those who recieved it were “added to their number”
the birth talked about above is simply d initial justification, it isnt even talking yet about santification. Do u need passages that describe salvation as a process?

just check act 2 and u will find “dead” men assisted by grace and the word of God making a righteous decision to follow christ even before they are their sins are washed away and the holy spirit recieved acts2:38,22:6, and saved (1pt3:21) in “the wash of regeneration”(titus 3:5)

and yet john 17:12 not one is lost but the one who is headed for distruction.
Peace,
ubenedictus
oldprof,
i could find ur response to this post and the one before it.
Did you miss it? Or am i to expect a response in the future.
 
Hi, Ubenedictus,

Seriously, this is a common problem with many Protestants. The emphasis is on ‘proof text’ that essentially answer whatever question one has with a one or two liner from the Bible - like that is all there is to consider. So, as you see - it is just soooooooooo much easier to lift something out of context and claim it fits.

My idea of Calvin’s ‘AoS’ is like claiming to be assured of winning the lottery - and not even buying a ticket! 😃 You are quite correct about not seeing any support for ‘AoS’ in the Bible - and that is because none actually exists. This does not mean that there are not a lot of people who would like to see it there - but, they have to simply ignore all those other passages (like the references I gave from Matthew) that simply trash ‘AoS’ As I see it, this is the ultimate loss of faith - we now have assurance! :rolleyes:

But, what I find really distressing is that anyone would delude themselves into thinking THEY are going to heaven for sure - and others are bound for damnation… and that would be all those who do not sign of with Calvin & Co. Speaking as real college professor, I have seen this with students who claim they know course content and do not need to study because they have so many other important things to do (and, many have a life filled with significant responsbilities). Then they find that they failed the test - and that tends to be very upsetting. So, in addition to everything else, now they have to pull up their grade. In class - this can be serious - but, it is the attitude that shows up in everything they do - that gets them in the end. In talking about one’s immortal soul - there is no dress rehersal - each day we are a little closer to meeting our Divine Judge.

God bless
it seems he jumped those verses! Can we say we even know the son if we dont do as he says? With faith must come the “obedience of faith”, i noticed this theme in some of st paul’s letter. In some places paul exchanges “faith” and “obedience of faith” as though they mean the same thing.
I just can’t see an absolute assurance of salvation there.
 
Now, hold on a minute, Ubenedictus - you’re going to have to take a number! 😃

OldProf has yet to respond to how St. Paul could be an ‘AoS’ advocate when he tells us that he must do what he does lest he find himself a castaway! 1Cor 9:27 Yes, the idea that people really do have a Fee Will and can choose God or choose the Devil - all the way until the end of their life. Then their will is permanently centered on their choice. Now, that is great news if one is focused on Christ and following His Commands - but infinitely depressing if facing the Devil… !

Of course be prepared for a flood of Scripture quotes that will undoubtedly mean about the same as the quotes he gave me trying to prove Chist was wrong!!!:eek:

God bless
oldprof,
i could find ur response to this post and the one before it.
Did you miss it? Or am i to expect a response in the future.
 
Now, hold on a minute, Ubenedictus - you’re going to have to take a number! 😃

OldProf has yet to respond to how St. Paul could be an ‘AoS’ advocate when he tells us that he must do what he does lest he find himself a castaway! 1Cor 9:27 Yes, the idea that people really do have a Fee Will and can choose God or choose the Devil - all the way until the end of their life. Then their will is permanently centered on their choice. Now, that is great news if one is focused on Christ and following His Commands - but infinitely depressing if facing the Devil… !

Of course be prepared for a flood of Scripture quotes that will undoubtedly mean about the same as the quotes he gave me trying to prove Chist was wrong!!!:eek:

God bless
Tom is correct. I have been answering his former post in sections and the 1 Cor 9:27 verse is the one that should get answered this evening. Then I can get to the next ones.

Regards, OldProf
 
OldProf,

In a previous post, you made a selective quote from 1John 5 - actually beginning your ‘proof’ at v 13. I think you should know that the previous 12 verses in 1John 5 do not support your interpretation. Let’s look at the text:

1 Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ is begotten by God, and everyone who loves the father loves [also] the one begotten by him 2In this way we know that we love the children of God when we love God and obey his commandments. 3For the love of God is this, that we keep his commandments. And his commandments are not burdensome,4 for whoever is begotten by God conquers the world. And the victory that conquers the world is our faith. 5Who [indeed] is the victor over the world but the one who believes that Jesus is the Son of God?

6This is the one who came through water and blood, Jesus Christ, not by water alone, but by water and blood. The Spirit is the one that testifies, and the Spirit is truth. 7So there are three that testify, 8the Spirit, the water, and the blood, and the three are of one accord.f 9If we accept human testimony, the testimony of God is surely greater. Now the testimony of God is this, that he has testified on behalf of his Son. 10Whoever believes in the Son of God has this testimony within himself. Whoever does not believe God has made him a liar by not believing the testimony God has given about his Son.h 11And this is the testimony: God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.i 12Whoever possesses the Son has life; whoever does not possess the Son of God does not have life.
13I write these things to you so that you may know that you have eternal life, you who believe in the name of the Son of God.

The highlighted sections in these first 12 verses tell us that if we love Christ we will be keeping His Commands. Simply cutting out these verses and waiving v13 around like ‘This is it!’ simply has missed the point.

Now, we both are of the opinion that neither of us understands the written word of God. You seem to think that I do not understand Matt 7. Fine. How about some evidence? On another thread I challenged anyone who did not believe in the Real Presence as contained in John 6 to simply write a 100 word (max) summary of the Chapter. This is honestly to read what is written and reduce this chapter to no more then 100 words. I think just demonstrating that one has a comprehension for what is actually there - before coming up with doctrinal material is a good first step to demonstrating understanding. This requires no more ability then a average 6th grader would have in demonstrating reading comprehension. Are you up for this challenge, OldProf? Just give me a summary whenever you wish - and, I will show you my summary of Matt 7. Placing them side by side, it will be quite easy to determine if there is an understanding for what is actually written.

God bless
You have finally answered 1 John 5:13 and, yes, I have a response. If it were a chess game, I would announce mate in 2. But, as I’m at work and under a time crunch, that can wait. I’m happy to see you are no longer avoiding this wonderful verse that tells us we can know we have eternal life.

We would have to qualify what we can understand about Scripture. All of it? No. But some of it is clear enough - just look at what you wrote above. Very, very clear.

I certainly could comment on John 6, and even summarize it, but I am on an AoS thread and so are you. Chess players of master class know how to press an advantage when a weakness is exposed. The weakness here is a faulty doctrine of assurance, I believe, coupled with a faulty doctrine that allows Jesus’ sheep to perish by their own free will.

I look forward to answering this one.

Regards, OldProf
 
Hi, OldProf,

I’m waiting - but, don’t rush or neglect your work… I’m not leaving… 😃

By the way, It is far better to call, “Checkmate!” once accomplished then to be premature.

God bless
You have finally answered 1 John 5:13 and, yes, I have a response. If it were a chess game, I would announce mate in 2. But, as I’m at work and under a time crunch, that can wait. I’m happy to see you are no longer avoiding this wonderful verse that tells us we can know we have eternal life.

We would have to qualify what we can understand about Scripture. All of it? No. But some of it is clear enough - just look at what you wrote above. Very, very clear.

I certainly could comment on John 6, and even summarize it, but I am on an AoS thread and so are you. Chess players of master class know how to press an advantage when a weakness is exposed. The weakness here is a faulty doctrine of assurance, I believe, coupled with a faulty doctrine that allows Jesus’ sheep to perish by their own free will.

I look forward to answering this one.

Regards, OldProf
 
Hi, OldProf,

I’m waiting - but, don’t rush or neglect your work… I’m not leaving… 😃

By the way, It is far better to call, “Checkmate!” once accomplished then to be premature.

God bless
Oh so true! 😉
 
Code:
adrift, since you are a synergist, then God and you have cooperated for your salvation when you die in a state of grace. Your good works and lack of mortal sin provided your part of the equation.
I hope you will all forgive me for jumping into the middle of this thread without reading everything. I have read the last few pages and this one has been nagging me since yesterday. I know that adrift has already corrected the wrong assumption that is made here, but I wanted to speak to it also.

“monergism” is a modern concept and term that is not found in Catholicism, scripture or holy tradition. Synergism is found, but it is not defined in the way you are using it.

You seem to be assuming (erroneously) that cooperation with God is somehow separated from the working of His grace, which it is not. That is why your conception here “your good works and lack of mortal sin provided your part of the equation”. This is a completely misconstrued viewpoint.

Human beings cannot produce any good works in the sight of God apart from Grace. It is only grace, working through His Love, that produces any good works. And none of us can be preserved from sin apart from grace, either. So neither of these things comes from a human source, and they are not “our” (human) contribution to some “equation”.

I think as a monergist you will agree with a Catholic that good works are produced in the believer by the working of the Spirit. I think you would also agree that it is only by His grace that we can be preserved from sin.
Thus, the glory for your salvation goes to both God, the initiator of your salvation, and you, the completer of your salvation.
This is also false, since we are His workmanship, and He is glorified in us as we are conformed to his image. Jesus is the author and finisher of our faith, not we ourselves.
Isn’t that true?
No, your conception of “synergism” is not an accurate representation of Catholic theology. I think it is true that many people do misunderstand the Catholic position in this way.
Code:
  Good works are certainly in my evidence list 2. The elect do good works in response to gifts of the Holy Spirit. First and foremost we are most thankful for eternal life as per "For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord." Romans 6:23. What a fantastic and great gift to be grateful for and to motivate us unto good works! Let us share that GREAT NEWS!
So how come your good works are a response to the gifts of the HS, but Catholic good works come from the human ego?
You are completely incorrect when you say I brush aside or ignore Scriptures. Systematic theology doesn’t allow that.
I believe that you think you don’t but from what we are reading, it is perfectly clear that you ignore or brush aside, discount or do whatever is necessary to avoid integrating scripture that does not square with the “systematic theology” viewpoint.
(John 10:27-28 "My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand.
No one can snatch them out, but they can sure JUMP out!
Code:
 Isn't it clear that Judas was chosen to fulfill the Scriptures that led to Christ's crucifixion? That he was of the devil? That is the value of the links I gave to demonstrate the clarity of that argument.
Yes. And I would futher dispute that he was ever a believer, sheep, etc. He can certainly have the office of Apostle despite being a son of the devil.
 
Hi, OldProf, …

Don’t stop there - we need to keep on going. Those who claim that they are saved simply because of the Grace of God - being the ‘Elect’ and that took care of it all - have misunderstood the entire message of salvation! (Oh, and by the way, too bad for those damned souls who are not convinced that they are the ‘Elect’!) This is no minor error - but one where we will be called to task for this presumption. If we are to comply with Christ’s directives we must love God and our neighbor. This means keeping the commands Christ has given to us and doing the Works of Mercy towards our neighbor. And, we do this with the full Faith and knowledge that we really do have Free Will and we have it within our wounded selves to reject God and His Grace and fail to persevere to the end - as Christ tells us to do. (Matt 24:13) These are NOT the words of comfort that one who is claiming to the numbered amongst the ‘Elect’ would gladly embrace. Actually Matt 24 simply stands ‘AoS’ on its head, and identifies it for the fraud it is.

Of course you are familiar with James 2:24 - where he tells us that Faith without works is dead. James is not criticizing Faith - he is telling those who think this is enough that they are sadly mistaken.

And finally, since you like St, Paul - let’s move to 1Cor 9:27 - where this great saint is concerned about freely failing to continue with God’s Grace - and becoming a castaway. Hardly the Scriptures that you have used to bolster this ‘AoS’ tradition of men (namely Calvin and those who followed after this man).

Now, it you really want to do something - stop addressing what others have said are inadequate, incomplete or misapplied Scriptures - and address what I have presented to you. Here is the heart of the argument - please if you want to know what is going on - just address it and we can see what develops.

God bless
Tom, you missed a few points in your first paragraph above. Did I claim what you’re saying? Certainly not. When you asked me why I thought I was one of the elect I answered in post #626 on 31 Oct 12. I gave two verses, 2 Cor 5:17 and 1 John 5:13, and then referenced Evidence Lists 1 and 2 (they were re-posted at #555 on 17 Oct 12). That is actually a pretty thorough response that shows I’m not just “saved simply because of the Grace of God - being the ‘Elect’ and that took care of it all” as you so flippantly indicate. No, the evidence is a radically changed personal life, a love for God, a desire to grow in the faith by knowing God, obedience, and perseverence. Really, did you actually miss all of that in my response?? I think you need to be more careful about looking at what I say.

Of course I completely agree with James 2:24 - if a “Christian” has no fruits, then there is no true faith - that person is still spiritually dead. Next is 1 Cor 9:27. Here is your proof text that even the mighty Paul is very concerned about losing his faith - his salvation. But that is not the context. If you read 1 Corithians chapters 9 and 10, you get the contextual picture. I’m a stickler on context, as are all systematic theology proponents. Let’s briefly look:

24 Do you not know that in a race all the runners run, but only one receives the prize? So run that you may obtain it. 25 Every athlete exercises self-control in all things. They do it to receive a perishable wreath, but we an imperishable. 26 So I do not run aimlessly; I do not box as one beating the air. 27 But I discipline my body and keep it under control, lest after preaching to others I myself should be disqualified. (1 Cor 9:24-27)

We don’t see Paul using “prize” as a metaphor for salvation. He uses “gift” like in “the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.” (Rom 6:23) A prize is a reward. Does Paul discuss rewards and loss of rewards? Yes, he surely does:

If anyone’s work is burned up, he will suffer loss, though he himself will be saved, but only as through fire. (1 Cor 3:15)

But by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace toward me was not in vain. On the contrary, I worked harder than any of them, though it was not I, but the grace of God that is with me. (1 Cor 15:10)

For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil. (2 Cor 5:10)

No temptation has overtaken you that is not common to man. God is faithful, and he will not let you be tempted beyond your ability, but with the temptation he will also provide the way of escape, that you may be able to endure it. (1 Cor 10:13 this is a favorite Navigators College Ministry memory verse)

Paul, hard worker that he was, knows that God is with us and works in us in a sanctifying manner, which is why he says, “And I am sure of this, that he who began a good work in you will bring it to completion at the day of Jesus Christ.” (Philippians 1:6) When the true believer sins, he/she can expect their “bad works” will result in loss, but not the loss of salvation. Why? Because we have an advocate in Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior! (see 1 John 2:1) Our Jesus is “the author and finisher of our faith, who for the joy that was set before Him endured the cross, despising the shame, and has sat down at the right hand of the throne of God.” (Hebrews 12:2)

What a wonderful Savior! And I can certainly agree with Him when He says he knows His sheep and they will NEVER perish! (as per John 10)

God Bless, OldProf
 
Hi, OldProf,

I have honestly read every word you wrote on these posts and I have attempted to exercise as much care as I can in my responses. I sincerely believe I understand what you are saying - and I am in total disagreement with any claim based on Scripture that anyone can know in advance that someone is one of the ‘Elect’ while still alive.

In post #626 you said, in part, :

"You say PERSEVERENCE is a requirement, i.e. the Free Will idea that a true sheep, one of the elect of God, can actually choose not to persevere (aka mortal sin), is where I would quibble with you. I would say that perseverence is exactly what the elect DO.The elect persevere. The elect abide in Christ. The elect love the Lord Jesus Christ and and keep His commandments. The elect have TRUE free will and can choose righteousness and sin."

Here is a link that honestly addresses your argument, and simply refutes it: catholicbasictraining.com/apologetics/coursetexts/1s.htm

In my opinion, your argument rests on a genuine confusion between present and future. Obviously, everyone in Heaven IS one of the ‘Sheep’ - it could not be any other way. That we are on earth and with our Free Will cooperating with the Grace of God so as to be admitted into Heaven - to be one of the ‘Sheep’ is not in dispute. But, to say that we claim to be the ‘Elect’ and will never lose our position because of (insert all of the misapplied Scripture quotes here…) disregards the reality of Free Will and our abillity to change our mind while we are on earth.

Now, let’s take a closer look at 1Cor 9. In fact, here is a link: usccb.org/bible/1corinthians/9 and because a better understanding of Paul’s ideas 1Cor 8 and 10 have a place here, too. (just click on ‘Previous’ to get to the previous chapter and ‘Next’ to go forward. I, too, think context is important.)

The plain text is this: Paul has freely chosen to follow Christ - and to do this, he has been personally instructed by Christ to preach. If he fails to do this - notwithstanding anything he has done previously - he will become a castaway. Paul still has a Free Will - and even after all that is happened - he know he can still abuse it. You will note that at no time do we hear Paul saying, “I’m one of the Sheep! I know I am going to heaven because I believe, because Christ redeemed me and because I have all this Scripture that says so!” None of that appears anywhere.

Denial of God’s Gift to us of Free Will is a serious mistake. Dismissing those challenges you have received as to your (and Calvin’s) personal interpretation of Scripture on this matter is simply inappropriate. We both agree that God knows who are His ‘Sheep’ and who aren’t. We disagree on when we realize we are a ‘Sheep’ that will not be snatched away - you claim you have such knowledge now, and I claim this will not be know until we are judged by God. No one would dispute that the answer can be found in Scripture - and I refer you to Matt 25 - it is not hard to image that in all three examples there were those who ‘knew’ that they were the ‘Elect’ - and were shocked to find out they weren’t. The ones who proved to be the real ‘Elect’ persevered until the end - and they were rewarded.

God bless
Tom, you missed a few points in your first paragraph above. Did I claim what you’re saying? Certainly not. When you asked me why I thought I was one of the elect I answered in post #626 on 31 Oct 12. I gave two verses, 2 Cor 5:17 and 1 John 5:13, and then referenced Evidence Lists 1 and 2 (they were re-posted at #555 on 17 Oct 12). That is actually a pretty thorough response that shows I’m not just “saved simply because of the Grace of God - being the ‘Elect’ and that took care of it all” as you so flippantly indicate. No, the evidence is a radically changed personal life, a love for God, a desire to grow in the faith by knowing God, obedience, and perseverence. Really, did you actually miss all of that in my response?? I think you need to be more careful about looking at what I say.

What a wonderful Savior! And I can certainly agree with Him when He says he knows His sheep and they will NEVER perish! (as per John 10)

God Bless, OldProf
 
Now, hold on a minute, Ubenedictus - you’re going to have to take a number! 😃

OldProf has yet to respond to how St. Paul could be an ‘AoS’ advocate when he tells us that he must do what he does lest he find himself a castaway! 1Cor 9:27 Yes, the idea that people really do have a Fee Will and can choose God or choose the Devil - all the way until the end of their life. Then their will is permanently centered on their choice. Now, that is great news if one is focused on Christ and following His Commands - but infinitely depressing if facing the Devil… !

Of course be prepared for a flood of Scripture quotes that will undoubtedly mean about the same as the quotes he gave me trying to prove Chist was wrong!!!:eek:

God bless
wow! I need to go get my pop corn. Since u are number one, i take the next number and sit on my chair eating my popcorn.
As for the flood of scriptures i already recieved them some pages back, i could visit the forums for some time 'cos i didnt have such abundance of time, imagine my suprise when i came in and i saw the thread “assurance of salvation” was still active. I though my computer was playing pranks or something.
You guy really had work to do and so far it was well done.
Cheers!
 
Hi, Ubenedictus,

Seriously, this is a common problem with many Protestants. The emphasis is on ‘proof text’ that essentially answer whatever question one has with a one or two liner from the Bible - like that is all there is to consider. So, as you see - it is just soooooooooo much easier to lift something out of context and claim it fits.

My idea of Calvin’s ‘AoS’ is like claiming to be assured of winning the lottery - and not even buying a ticket! 😃 You are quite correct about not seeing any support for ‘AoS’ in the Bible - and that is because none actually exists. This does not mean that there are not a lot of people who would like to see it there - but, they have to simply ignore all those other passages (like the references I gave from Matthew) that simply trash ‘AoS’ As I see it, this is the ultimate loss of faith - we now have assurance! :rolleyes:

But, what I find really distressing is that anyone would delude themselves into thinking THEY are going to heaven for sure - and others are bound for damnation… and that would be all those who do not sign of with Calvin & Co. Speaking as real college professor, I have seen this with students who claim they know course content and do not need to study because they have so many other important things to do (and, many have a life filled with significant responsbilities). Then they find that they failed the test - and that tends to be very upsetting. So, in addition to everything else, now they have to pull up their grade. In class - this can be serious - but, it is the attitude that shows up in everything they do - that gets them in the end. In talking about one’s immortal soul - there is no dress rehersal - each day we are a little closer to meeting our Divine Judge.

God bless
it seems my brother Calvin needs some strokes, he caused all this, he streched luther’s version and landed us in a funny funny arguement where once u believe u are save and d moment u backslide that means u arent saved in the first place and yet how can u call such a model “once saved always saved”? It should be “once saved, if really saved, always saved”.
 
Hi, OldProf,

I have honestly read every word you wrote on these posts and I have attempted to exercise as much care as I can in my responses. I sincerely believe I understand what you are saying - and I am in total disagreement with any claim based on Scripture that anyone can know in advance that someone is one of the ‘Elect’ while still alive.

In post #626 you said, in part, :

"You say PERSEVERENCE is a requirement, i.e. the Free Will idea that a true sheep, one of the elect of God, can actually choose not to persevere (aka mortal sin), is where I would quibble with you. I would say that perseverence is exactly what the elect DO.The elect persevere. The elect abide in Christ. The elect love the Lord Jesus Christ and and keep His commandments. The elect have TRUE free will and can choose righteousness and sin."

Here is a link that honestly addresses your argument, and simply refutes it: catholicbasictraining.com/apologetics/coursetexts/1s.htm

In my opinion, your argument rests on a genuine confusion between present and future. Obviously, everyone in Heaven IS one of the ‘Sheep’ - it could not be any other way. That we are on earth and with our Free Will cooperating with the Grace of God so as to be admitted into Heaven - to be one of the ‘Sheep’ is not in dispute. But, to say that we claim to be the ‘Elect’ and will never lose our position because of (insert all of the misapplied Scripture quotes here…) disregards the reality of Free Will and our abillity to change our mind while we are on earth.

Now, let’s take a closer look at 1Cor 9. In fact, here is a link: usccb.org/bible/1corinthians/9 and because a better understanding of Paul’s ideas 1Cor 8 and 10 have a place here, too. (just click on ‘Previous’ to get to the previous chapter and ‘Next’ to go forward. I, too, think context is important.)

The plain text is this: Paul has freely chosen to follow Christ - and to do this, he has been personally instructed by Christ to preach. If he fails to do this - notwithstanding anything he has done previously - he will become a castaway. Paul still has a Free Will - and even after all that is happened - he know he can still abuse it. You will note that at no time do we hear Paul saying, “I’m one of the Sheep! I know I am going to heaven because I believe, because Christ redeemed me and because I have all this Scripture that says so!” None of that appears anywhere.

Denial of God’s Gift to us of Free Will is a serious mistake. Dismissing those challenges you have received as to your (and Calvin’s) personal interpretation of Scripture on this matter is simply inappropriate. We both agree that God knows who are His ‘Sheep’ and who aren’t. We disagree on when we realize we are a ‘Sheep’ that will not be snatched away - you claim you have such knowledge now, and I claim this will not be know until we are judged by God. No one would dispute that the answer can be found in Scripture - and I refer you to Matt 25 - it is not hard to image that in all three examples there were those who ‘knew’ that they were the ‘Elect’ - and were shocked to find out they weren’t. The ones who proved to be the real ‘Elect’ persevered until the end - and they were rewarded.

God bless
Well, Tom, I have this to say as I read your post at work during the lunch hour:
  1. “Here is a link that honestly addresses your argument, and simply refutes it: http://www.catholicbasictraining.com…setexts/1s.htm”
Nope. Doesn’t refute it, and it isn’t a good argument because it ignores important verses and doesn’t even explain well the ones it “takes on.” I’ll dismantle it and show just how far it misses the point, if you prefer. I don’t know who originally wrote it, perhaps Kenneth Baker or Pablo Straub, but this won’t convince a proponent of systematic theology. We prefer to look and comment on ALL texts pertinent to the theological doctrines (biblical soteriology being supreme!). That is one of the reasons I believe we have such a strong case for assurance and eternal security (or OSAS, or sometimes I call it “if saved always saved”).
  1. “here is a link: http://www.usccb.org/bible/1corinthians/9
Okay, read it. I see that their interpretation agrees with yours, which is no surprise, of course. So, since this is a RC commentary, I thought I’d look at another super well known Scripture, Romans 8, that talks about separating someone from God’s love. Paul makes a pretty strong point that it will NOT happen. He even emphasizes it:

37 No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. 38 For I am sure that neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to come, nor powers, 39 nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord. (Romans 8:37-39)

So, what do the commentators say?? They don’t address that. Nor do they provide a valuable or enlightening commentary on 1 John 5:13 where John says, “I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God that you may know that you have eternal life.” Doesn’t John seem to emphasize that a believer may know that they have eternal life? (AKA “Assurance” - but I still have your response to answer from the earlier post where you think I’m taking it out of context.)

And, no, I do not deny free will.

So, that is a quick look-see and comment. Back to work.

Regards, OldProf
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top