A
Abba
Guest
I am not buying it. It seems to me as though the New York Times is pretending to be concerned. What is the big difference between: “…Quit…” and “…Consider Quitting…”? As a matter of fact, '…Consider Quitting…" could very well be considered to be more effective. This change request was made public and lamented by that atheist organization - how convenient. You guard my back and I’Il guard yours.According to a press release from the Catholic League, the offensive advertisement appears in today’s New York Times
standardnewswire.com/news/486947076.html
The Freedom From Religion Foundation website states that the ad appears on page 10, front section. It also mentions that the New York Times required that the title of the ad be changed from ‘It’s Time to Quit the Catholic Church,’ to ‘It’s Time to Consider Quitting the Catholic Church.’
The website quotes their co-president, Dan Barker, who called the required change “disappointing” and that it was "a sign of the Catholic Church’s inordinate power to intimidate and muzzle criticism.”
I’m sure everyone here is aware of the tremendous influence the Catholic Church has with the New York Times.![]()
I say the New York Times makes public how much exactly received for the one page ad they dared to publish attacking the Catholic Church and if any discount was given.
This reminds me of a time when a professor heard about a person who got caught trying to hurt a colleague career wise and financially. The professor’s said that the error the person did was to be so adamant about it. That sometimes it is more effective to ask a question regarding someones’s professional career to the right person and subtly put in to question an individual rather than out right criticize. Is this the psychology behind the New York Times changed on 'Quit" to “Consider Quitting”?
