I
IgnatianPhilo
Guest
You cannot justify Muhammad’s marriages by saying they needed contracts established between different peoples, it would have been sufficient if one of Muhammad’s relatives had decided to marry, nor was marrying Aisha at six (and having sex when she was 9) justified by any stretch. Muhammad’s life bares out that his marriages were not all motivated politically but many of them were for pleasure or because he desired it and he hypocritcally limited every other muslim’s to four, but apparently God’s apostle is higher than everyone else that he can marry his adopted son’s wife, a gross and evil thing to do.It is a big jump from saying that monogamy was the ideal God had in mind, and noting the practical disadvantages of polygamy (I agree on both points), to saying that Abraham and other patriarchs grossly sinned. While polygamous marriage is less than ideal, there may nevertheless be situations in which it is the most ethical choice. One example is most of the marriages of Muhammad: he married widows and older women, and had children only by Khadijah and Maria. Baha’u’llah’s second wife, Fatemeh, was also a widow, and the Nuri family had obligations to her since Baha’u’llah’s father had arranged her first marriage, to a much older man who was an associate of Baha’u’llah’s father.
You asked “Does the practice immediately become wrong as soon as the revelation is revealed?” If we are speaking of practices such as forms of worship, family law, dietary laws and so on; these are not right or wrong. Each religious community has its own, and they are as I said before a badge of discipleship. I for example do not take communion, since I am a Bahai not a Christian. But I do not consider it wrong for a Christian to take communion; for them it is the right form. Christians do not pray at the wailing wall, but it is not wrong for Jews to do so.
In contrast, cruelty, deception, greed and cowardice are wrong. if we find a (claimed) Manifestation of God is cruel, deceptive or greedy, we know they are false. He who lies, serves the lord of lies.
Thats just my view on the marriages of Muhammad I suspect you consider them justified because you think God considers them okay. But how is it right for Christians to still take communion in your eyes? The eucharist is something gone and done away with in Muhammad and to do this seems to be a fundamentally wrong act even if it is done on a false understanding of the world. It still seems like the revelator is secondary to the revelation in bahai understanding, since the coming of the revelator does nothing except when he reveals how God wants to change things up.
