J
JaneFrances
Guest
Tertullian goes on to say in 20…That those who are to be baptized should…
** “pray with repeated prayers, fasts, and bendings of the knee, and vigils all the night through, and with the confession of all by gone sins” **
My son would have really struggled doing this at 4 weeks of age…
Tertullian, treatise on BAPTISM 18,4 (c. AD 200-206)
"According to circumstance and disposition and even age of the individual person, it may be better to delay Baptism; and especially so in the case of little children. Why, indeed, is it necessary – if it be not a case of necessity – that the sponsors to be thrust into danger, when they themselves may fail to fulfill their promises by reason of death, or when they may be disappointed by the growth of an evil disposition? Indeed the Lord says, ‘Do not forbid them to come to me’ [Matt 19:14; Luke 18:16].
He opposed infant and early childhood Baptism because of his understanding of the regenerative effects of Baptism for the remission of sins.“Let them come, then, while they grow up, while they learn, while they are taught to whom to come; let them become Christians when they will have been able to know Christ! Why does the innocent age hasten to the remission of sins? …For no less cause should the unmarried also be deferred, in whom there is an aptness to temptation – in virgins on account of their ripeness as also in the widowed on account of their freedom – until they are married or are better strengthened for continence. Anyone who understands the seriousness of Baptism will fear its reception more than its deferral. Sound faith is secure of its salvation!”
I understand that you agree with Tertullian on infant Baptism. Do you also agree with him on Baptismal regeneration and the reason he opposed infant Baptism?