[BIBLEDRB][/BIBLEDRB]
Hi Steve, it’s not relevant to categorise it as Bahai think or Catholic think. What is important in the context of this discussion on this theme of the relativity of truth is, is it Jewish think?
The perspective is very simple.
To a Jew, this is truth: (from the Jewish Encyclopedia(
Circumcision causes an angel to save the Israelites from the pangs of Gehenna, to which, according to Ezek. xxxii. 24, the uncircumcised ('arelim) are consigned (Tan., Lek Leka, ed. Buber, 27; Ex. R. xix.). According to Gen. R. xlviii., it is Abraham who sits at the gate of Gehenna to save the circumcised (see Abraham). “Circumcision is of such importance that heaven and earth are held only by the fulfilment of that covenant [after Jer. xxxi. 35]; and all the merits of Moses could not shield him against the danger to which he was exposed in consequence of the neglect of this command. It is a thirteenfold covenant”
Does a Catholic hold the words written above to be wholly and totally true?
If not, then you have Bahai progressive revelation.
The same goes with the Jewish statement that Moses is the greatest man to ever walk the earth. Does a Catholic think that? No. But a Jew does. If you say that this is an incomplete interpretation of the Jewish literature, then you are basically stating the validity of the relativity of truth.