Between Brock Turner and Brett Kavanaugh, when do girls matter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheAmazingGrace
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
“It’s not surprising that Ms Keyser has no recollection of the evening as they did not discuss it,” Katz said in a statement. “It’s also unremarkable that Ms. Keyser does not remember attending a specific gathering 30 years ago at which nothing of consequence happened to her. Dr. Ford of course will never forget this gathering because of what happened to her there.”
Nor does Keyser even know who Kavanaugh is.

I mean, she does now certainly…so, the lawyer Katz is just trying to put a positive spin on it, it seems to me.

“It’s not surprising that Ms Keyser has no recollection of the evening as they did not discuss it,” Katz said in a statement. “It’s also unremarkable that Ms. Keyser does not remember attending a specific gathering 30 years ago at which nothing of consequence happened to her. Dr. Ford of course will never forget this gathering because of what happened to her there.”

They did not discuss it? So she doesn’t remember? That statement really is not very coherent. It seems to acknowledge, another witness down. No one corroborates the story.

**
But the White House immediately seized on the statement, adding Keyser was the latest individual who did not remember the party where Ford says the alleged sexual assault happened. “One week ago, Dr. Christine Ford claimed she was assaulted at a house party attended by four others. Since then, all four of these individuals have provided statements to the Senate Judiciary Committee denying any knowledge of the incident or even having attended such a party," Kerri Kupec, a spokeswoman for the White House, said in a statement.
**

 
Last edited:
This weak but emotionally compelling narrative is so passionately charged because it’s really about abortion and how Brett Kavanaugh, as a Supreme Court Justice, might impact America’s form of child sacrifice. (BTW, I don’t think he WILL do anything to change Roe v Wade. I think it’s the irrational fear of those who see abortion as a necessary good).

Dr Christine Blasey Ford has co-published 8 studies for off-label use of the abortion drug commonly known as RU 486.
Christine Blasey Ford Published Eight studies about "Abortion Pill" and Works for Company that Produces It
 
Are you privy to his private life?
I’m privy to what’s been in the news about how he treated women the past decades.
None of his many female law clerks have uttered a single complaint about how they were treated.
None of his colleagues have hinted that he is sexist, let alone abusive.
No extra martial affairs have come to light.

THERE IS NO PATTERN to support this witch hunt.
 
Just because Ford is pro-abortion, doesn’t prove that she might be amenable to manipulation by Feinstein and other Soros tools. Nope. Doesn’t prove that at all.
Whistling
 
Last edited:
This weak but emotionally compelling narrative is so passionately charged because it’s really about abortion and how Brett Kavanaugh, as a Supreme Court Justice, might impact America’s form of child sacrifice. (BTW, I don’t think he WILL do anything to change Roe v Wade. I think it’s the irrational fear of those who see abortion as a necessary good).

Dr Christine Blasey Ford has co-published 8 studies for off-label use of the abortion drug commonly known as RU 486.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/christine-blasey-ford-published-eight-studies-about-abortion-pill-and-worked-for-company-that-produces-it/
IMHO, the narrative is driven by an absolute hysteria by the left via abortion.
 
Polygraph tests are no longer used in courts of law as they have been proven to be u reliable
 
40.png
Theo520:
THERE IS NO PATTERN
The problem with this standard is that allows everyone to do it once.
So if Kavanaugh can’t appeal to his lifetime of living and working with women, without a whiff of impropriety, what recourse does he have to disprove these accusations?
 
So if Kavanaugh can’t appeal to his lifetime of living and working with women, without a whiff of impropriety, what recourse does he have to disprove these accusations?
He might appeal to his character at that time. Judging from his high school yearbook comments, however, that might not be helpful.

So, as we have seen, his supporters will work every angle to undercut the credibility and character of Dr. Ford.
 
Last edited:
He might appeal to his character at that time. Judging from his high school yearbook comments, however, that might not be helpful.

So, as we have seen, his supporters will work every angle to undercut the credibility and character of Dr. Ford.
You have no idea if those are his own comments. Look at others. Maybe the whole thing was done tongue -in-cheek with all students but you wish to accuse him. That is not Christian nor Charitable.
 
[/quote
So, as we have seen, his supporters will work every angle to undercut the credibility and character of Dr. Ford.
[/quote]

Was this directed towards me?
 
You have no idea if those are his own comments. Look at others. Maybe the whole thing was done tongue -in-cheek with all students but you wish to accuse him.
I don’t accuse him. But what he wrote will not help establish the impeccability that we hear about, even if done tongue in cheek. The idea that false comments were put in the yearbook instead of his own seem to be a bit of a stretch.
 
Excuse me, you don’t know he wrote that. You are muckraking now. You don’t have proof. Maybe a lot of the yearbook was written as a spoof, people kidding around.
 
So if we are weighing the evidence, it’s one page taken from a 17 yr olds high school yearbook against 35 yrs of public service
 
Excuse me, you don’t know he wrote that.
Are you actually making a credible argument that that was not written by him. Is there any basis for that idea?
Your charges of muckraking are more than a little ironic, given what you have posted about dr. Ford.
 
So if we are weighing the evidence, it’s one page taken from a 17 yr olds high school yearbook against 35 yrs of public service
The HS yearbook looks like that could have been thrown in there as a joke and it might have been put in for all/most/some students. It’s not uncommon. Yearbooks have a history of having humoress quotes.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top