Biden Brain Freeze: Joe Claims He Was Elected to the Senate ‘180 Years Ago’

[Dobby]

Interesting approach, however even his biggest fans aren’t buying it. And yes, there is plenty of “story” there.

 

[MikeInVA]

So what’s the story? That a business man successfully navigated the tax code to legally avoid paying (legally unnecessary) taxes?

 

[JanR]

Only thing I can figure is they plan to have Joe step down for “health reasons” 4 days before the election and name Harris as their candidate, who will then choose Pelosi as her running mate.

OH, MY! Heaven help us!

 

[upant]

This video explains it very well.

yes, it does, but do people want the truth? they need it to be false to fuel their orange man bad. they will attack Prager and not watch it nor fact-check it themself.

 

[YADA]

I might. I may not deem your interpretation of the truth to be relevant. But who knows?

so - now you saw the video where Trump specifically condemned the neo-Nazis provided by Rockoh22

This video explains it very well.

what say you?

 

[CradleRC58]

Lol

No more bizarre than running Joe imo !

 

[CradleRC58]

Harris’s cabinet

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

 

[Cathoholic]

Dovekin . . .

This entry from Wikipedia . . .

So what?

Wikipedia? Really?

Did you watch the original Charlottesville comments videos?

You can see it yourself and any honest asessment can see they are lying about President Trump.

I have posted the proverbial “blow by blow” here before.

Would it matter if I post it again so you can see for yourself?

Why not just watch the videos for yourself?
Nobody needs “wikipedia” to make those decisions for them.

Wikipedia is notoriously unreliable for anything politically conservative, Republican, or critical of the leftists, especially the socialists and Marxists.

 

[Dovekin]

On August 12, 2017 Trump was at a bill signing where he denounced the violence at Charlottesville, inserting on many sides. A few minutes later, the event was over and reporters yelled questions at him, including about condemning “white supremacists.” As is normal, those questions were ignored, but I mention it because it shows there were questions at that point.

The President’s staff sent out clarifications, and made sure that other further comments were cloaked with explicit condemnations of some of the rightist groups. But “very fine people on both sides” was doubling down on “on many sides”, which had been in the news for several days. It undercut the message of condemnation.

The best part of your video was the preamble about going to the record and checking for yourself. I wish the speaker had done that, instead of going to the August 15, 2017 comments after the message had been massaged by the politicians and pundits. Maybe I missed it, but he did not present the context of the remarks and how “on many sides” had been taken.

So no, I am not convinced by this video. I prepared a response quoting the August 12 statement, but my internet failed me yesterday. Have I changed your opinion?

 

[Rockoh22]

So no, I am not convinced by this video.

That is ok. You at least looked it up, and that is more than most.

 

[Dovekin]

How are my remarks an insult? I am only pointing out that in some threads you say things like:

See if there was ANYTHING criticising the story as . . . .

“Wow. These guys got it so wrong. Experts said the video was altered and the sound dubbed.” Or some other critique of the SUBSTANCE of the article.

Is there virtually ANY addressing of the CONTENT?

In this thread, you say:

Wikipedia? Really?
…
Wikipedia is notoriously unreliable for anything politically conservative, Republican, or critical of the leftists, especially the socialists and Marxists.

When I observe that you do not have much credibility with the latter comments, it is not intended as an insult. Accusing me of insulting you is more of an insult than what I said.

We are agreed that it is best to go to the original sources, rather than rehashed news reports. I am not sure what original videos you want to look at. We would have to agree what are the “original” videos. The video @Rockoh22 posted makes a convincing argument from the August 15, 2017 video, but the controversy started on August 12, 2017. The Aug 15 tape is not the origin of the story; Trump’s words have already been doctored by the politicians to respond to the controversy over the Aug 12 comments.

Or take Biden having a “brain freeze.” The video shows Biden saying he was in the Senate 180 years ago. No one contests that that happened. I question the diagnosis that this is an example of a critical brain freeze and a sign of dementia. Checking the original video is not going to settle anything about the different interpretations of it.

So what original videos are you suggesting we look at, and what are we looking for? I would rather not use videos, but if there is something you want to look at, I will look.

 

[Jeanne_S]

:rofl:Yikes!

 

[Cathoholic]

Do you want to go through the ORIGINAL footage and discuss the truth of the Charlottesville hoax claims or don’t you?

Dovekin. If you want I will post them.

If the truth won’t make any difference, I am not going to waste my time.

 

[Dovekin]

Do you want to go through the ORIGINAL footage and discuss the truth of the Charlottesville hoax claims or don’t you?

I would like to know what you consider to be original footage. The video posted earlier demonstrated convincingly that Trump condemned Nazism. But they did not use original footage, only footage that presented Trump after he had been instructed by his handlers to give the politically correct message.

So what “original footage” do you want to discuss?

 

[Cathoholic]

Dovekin . . .

I would like to know what you consider to be original footage.

I have asked you several times if you want to see the original footage.

You’ve given me nothing but deflection.

Go ahead and think whatever you want. But if you think Trump was supporting white supremacists or any other kind of supremacists you are wrong.

 

[adamhovey1988]

That would put some of the racist comments he made in context. Well, it would, if it wasn’t for the fact he still makes them.

 

[Cathoholic]

To the readers here that are interested in truth.

This from @gam197 (right here) on a
whole thread where the Charlottesville hoax was unpacked . . .

I would save a link to this whole thread because it will not be long before a poster on these forums will again say President Trump said this about Charlottesville.

My reply to gam197?

(That was in the next post here.)

You are absolutely right gam197.

Which is exactly why I wanted ALL of this ORIGINAL information right here on this thread.

It did not start out that way. But one post in, and I saw we needed to go in that direction.

This thread from here on out, will become
"Charlottesville Central" against Fake News
on that subject.

Your “all in one” reference source.

Thanks to fellow-posters like yourself and others here that just want an accurate portrayal of the situation.

Covfefe.

 

[Cathoholic]

• Original Presidential Charlottesville Response transcript (here)
• Original Presidential Charlottesville Response video (here)
• Trump Towers Charlottesville follow-up press conference transcript (here)
• Trump Towers Charlottesville follow-up press conference video (here)

.

To the readers here.

Some people don’t want truth.
When this is the case it is a microcosm of them not wanting Truth
in some cases (it can be a rejection of Christ-Truth incarnate to willingly knowingly rebel against truth). This is the sin of incredulity.

CCC 2089a Incredulity is the neglect of revealed truth or the willful refusal to assent to it. "

For those interested in the truth of this, I want to invite you readers to go through the actual original and follow-up videos.

You will see.

Here are the links again. . . .

• Original Presidential Charlottesville Response transcript (here)
• Original Presidential Charlottesville Response video (here)
• Trump Towers Charlottesville follow-up press conference transcript (here)
• Trump Towers Charlottesville follow-up press conference video (here)

.

For those that don’t have the time to investigate the original sources and WANT a summary PragerU’s summary is the best I’ve seen. . . .

.

The Media Lied About Trump’s Charlottesville Comments​

66,302 views

Published on Aug 7, 2019
The media has been lying for two years about who President Trump called “very fine people.” The lies continue this very week.

A straight exploration of the facts should reveal the truth. That’s what CNN political analyst Steve Cortes does in this critical video.

.

And I will “mark” this with “covfefe” (easy to remember) so if you ever want to come back here for the REAL truth,
you can search “covfefe” + "Charlottesville"
view it yourself,
and it will help you cut through the FAKE news rapidly and bring you right here (complete with links to the ORIGINAL sources so you can review it and draw the VERY OBVIOUS conclusion that President Trump is being smeared here yet again).

Some people LIKE to be fooled or TRY to FOOL others like that.
Pope Francis had harsh words for those people.
Others are people of goodwill but just don’t know.

This post and the included links will make it easy to get up to snuff on this story rapidly.

 

[Cathoholic]

Just for the record:

There WERE very good people on both sides of the statue issue.

There were lousy people on both sides of the statue issue too.

But just because someone says there are good people on both sides of the statue issue,
does NOT equate to neonazis being among the “good”.

Add to that Trump EXPLICITLY stated he was not talking about neonazis among the “good” and it is inconceivable that any person of good will would use these charges to destroy Trump’s reputation.

That is a sin against the fifth commandment.

It is a form of murder.

And that’s WHY seeing rabid ABORTION (murder of innocent preborn human persons) supporter Joe Biden kick off his campaign using this murderous smear (the whole foundation of the start of Biden’s campaign was based upon a LIE! THIS LIE!!)
was no surprise to me.

And Biden has CONTINUED using it (and the media for the most part plays along-CNN’s Jake Tapper is a notable exception).

Because when one form of murder is OK with you, it is easy to OK another form.

That charge that Trump affirmed neo-Nazis is dishonest.

Here is satire on the kick-off of Biden’s campaign . . .

.

Here is the actual disgusting kick-off of Biden’s dishonest-based campaign.

Biden may know this depending on his degree of confusion.
Biden’s staff (and now you) CERTAINLY knows it (the “Charlottesville charges” against Trump are dishonest).

Don’t let these abortion-supporting people FOOL you.

 

[Dovekin]

• Original Presidential Charlottesville Response transcript (here )
• Original Presidential Charlottesville Response video (here )
• Trump Towers Charlottesville follow-up press conference transcript (here)
• Trump Towers Charlottesville follow-up press conference video (here)

.

To the readers here.

Some people don’t want truth .

As I pointed out with the earlier video, Trump’s original statement about Charlottesville came on August 12, 2017. CSPAN has video and transcript of closed captioning:

WE ARE CLOSELY FOLLOWING THE TERRIBLE EVENTS UNFOLDING IN CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA. WE CONDEMN IN THE STRONG AS POSSIBLE TERMS THIS EGREGIOUS DISPLAY OF HATRED, BIGOTRY AND VIOLENCE ON MANY SIDES. ON MANY SIDES. IT HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR A LONG TIME IN OUR COUNTRY. NOT DONALD TRUMP, NOT BARACK OBAMA, IT HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR A LONG, LONG TIME. IT IS NO PLACE IN AMERICA

Within minutes, as he was leaving the room, people were asking Trump:

MR. PRESIDENT, DO YOU WANT THE SUPPORT OF THESE WHITE NATIONAL GROUPS TO SAY THAT THEY SUPPORT YOU? HAVE YOU DENOUNCED THEM STRONGLY ENOUGH?

Do not be fooled by people who think Trump’s statements on August 14 or August 15 are the original statements. These are politically correct statements fashioned by Trump’s advisers in response to the controversy started on August 12.