S
stpurl
Guest
Lots of apples and oranges there, friend.
The point is, a Catholic remains Catholic whether they are good , that is, orthodox practicing Catholics who support the teachings, or ‘bad’, that is, heterodox Catholics who deny some, many, or even ‘all’ the teachings.
Catholic is Catholic.
A Catholic who supported slavery would be a Catholic or either misunderstood the Catholic teaching (due to a lack of knowledge regarding chattel slavery or an imperfect understanding of the system, or of personal dignity, etc) or a person who knew and understood the Catholic teaching and chose to ignore it due to a desire for wealth etc. And it’s the same with abortion. A Catholic who chooses to reject Catholic teaching is a heterodox Catholic, whether they choose to reject it due to lack of understanding, or whether they choose to reject for some kind of personal gain; however, a Catholic who does not truly know or understand may not be personally culpable for the objective sin in ignoring or disobeying the teaching, whereas the Catholic who does know and chooses to reject it IS culpable.
The poor Catholics who are deluded into thinking that abortion is not sinful, or ‘not in some circumstances’, or that it’s a simple ‘religious’ issue rather than one of human rights, or that it’s OK up until a certain point, etc., may or may not be culpable for the objective mortal sin of disagreeing with the teaching of the Church. A young person with rabidly liberal relatives and a lack of exposure to teaching, even with it being widely available on the Internet, will probably have much less culpability than a middle aged or older person who has had plenty of experience with pro-life family and friends, plenty of access to authentic church documents, etc.
With great knowledge, to paraphrase, comes great responsibility.
The point is, a Catholic remains Catholic whether they are good , that is, orthodox practicing Catholics who support the teachings, or ‘bad’, that is, heterodox Catholics who deny some, many, or even ‘all’ the teachings.
Catholic is Catholic.
A Catholic who supported slavery would be a Catholic or either misunderstood the Catholic teaching (due to a lack of knowledge regarding chattel slavery or an imperfect understanding of the system, or of personal dignity, etc) or a person who knew and understood the Catholic teaching and chose to ignore it due to a desire for wealth etc. And it’s the same with abortion. A Catholic who chooses to reject Catholic teaching is a heterodox Catholic, whether they choose to reject it due to lack of understanding, or whether they choose to reject for some kind of personal gain; however, a Catholic who does not truly know or understand may not be personally culpable for the objective sin in ignoring or disobeying the teaching, whereas the Catholic who does know and chooses to reject it IS culpable.
The poor Catholics who are deluded into thinking that abortion is not sinful, or ‘not in some circumstances’, or that it’s a simple ‘religious’ issue rather than one of human rights, or that it’s OK up until a certain point, etc., may or may not be culpable for the objective mortal sin of disagreeing with the teaching of the Church. A young person with rabidly liberal relatives and a lack of exposure to teaching, even with it being widely available on the Internet, will probably have much less culpability than a middle aged or older person who has had plenty of experience with pro-life family and friends, plenty of access to authentic church documents, etc.
With great knowledge, to paraphrase, comes great responsibility.