V
VictoriaAdAeternam
Guest
Odd. One should kneel until the tabernacle is closed.
Where is this from? The USCCB indeed tried to make it a rule to receive Communion standing but were in fact corrected by Rome. The Universal Norm of the whole Church is to receive kneeling and on the tounge and anything else is allowed by indult only, meaning the indult could be revoked at any time.The General Instruction asks each country’s Conference of Bishops to determine the posture to be used for the reception of Communion and the act of reverence to be made by each person as he or she receives Communion. In the United States, the body of Bishops determined that Communion should be received standing, and that a bow is the act of reverence made by those receiving. These norms may require some adjustment on the part of those who have been used to other practices, however the significance of unity in posture and gesture as a symbol of our unity as members of the one body of Christ should be the governing factor in our own actions.
The norm for reception of Holy Communion in the dioceses of the United States is standing. Communicants should not be denied Holy Communion because they kneel. Rather, such instances should be addressed pastorally, by providing the faithful with proper catechesis on the reasons for this norm.
GIRM 160. Including adaptations for the dioceses of the USA
no. 43 gives the postures during Mass, statingIt is up to the Conferences of Bishops to decide on the adaptations indicated in this General Instruction and in the Order of Mass and, once their decisions have been accorded the recognitio of the Apostolic See, to introduce them into the Missal itself. These adaptations include
The gestures and posture of the faithful (cf. no. 43)…
GIRM 390
The list of exceptions is not complete, ie it does not mention the period after communion/after the tabernacle is closed. I doubt that “after the Agnus Dei” is meant to include “until the tabernacle is closed” or whatever sign you use for the end of the distribution of communion. But maybe it is. My understanding is that it means we stand throughout the Communion procession, though it is not completely spelled out.The faithful should stand… from the invitation, Orate, fratres ( Pray, brethren ), before the prayer over the offerings until the end of Mass, except at the places indicated below…
The faithful kneel after the Agnus Dei unless the diocesan Bishop determines otherwise.
The other portions I quoted match what I quoted from the Vatican’s site.The norm established for the Dioceses of the United States of America is that Holy Communion is to be received standing, unless an individual member of the faithful wishes to receive Communion while kneeling (Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, Instruction, Redemptionis Sacramentum, March 25, 2004, no. 91).
If that is the case, then why not kneel for all of the prayers? BTW, I’m not opposed at all to people, in the Roman Rite (in the Byzantine Rite, we don’t kneel at all on Sundays), kneeling for prayers after communion, and I’m somewhat perplexed as to why bishops of the Latin Church would want to prevent people from doing so. However, I don’t see that kneeling is somehow a superior posture to standing for prayer, given that the people stand for most of the prayers.the superior posture for praying is kneeling
If that is the case, I would say it is culturally or regionally conditioned. As I’ve noted in some of my previous posts, in the Byzantine Rite, we do not kneel at all on Sundays, because for us, the traditional posture of prayer is standing. Traditionally, we stand for all of the prayers of the Divine Liturgy. We stand while praying before icons. We stand for our prayers after receiving Holy Communion. I just don’t believe that Roman Catholics kneeling in prayer after Holy Communion are being more prayerful than are Byzantine Catholics who stand in prayer after Holy Communion. What I can believe is that for those who have come to associate kneeling with personal prayer, it can be more conducive to prayer. I do not believe it is an objectively superior posture of prayer.I would even say that for the purpose the whole congregation engaging in silent, personal praying, of the three posture options, standing is the least effective. Sitting is better than standing. Just my opinion.
I do.Do you want to join with the saints in praising God forever?
Et iube me venire ad te,
Ut cum Sanctis tuis laudem te,
In saecula saeculorum.
As I recall, the announcement was along the lines of “the bishop wants us standing after Communion & this is a remainder to everyone that you need to do it.” It was not stated in an “optional” way as I recall. That’s what prompted me to ask my question in the first place. I was surprised a bishop could just wipe out kneeling after communion like that when it’s been “usual” in the West for… centuries? Now I have been to churches where most folks stand, but I’ve never heard that it was because of the bishop - I figured that due to the congregation being primarily older folks, it was just more comfortable for the majority to stand. I knelt because I was able to do so. This was different - it appeared to me like a directive to stand.In the OP, apparently the Bishop asked, he did not give a definite directive.
I’ll agree with that. So I just can’t wrap my mind around why the bishops would want to change that? “Unity” doesn’t quite convince me. Anyone feel it’s disunifying when we kneel while the Communion line is still progressing?? Also, at my parish that would be a LOT of standing. I’m sure some folks would get tired and sit. Which messes up unity, right?What I can believe is that for those who have come to associate kneeling with personal prayer, it can be more conducive to prayer. I do not believe it is an objectively superior posture of prayer
The point is that personal prayer is inappropriate during the communion procession. People should be acting as one, standing and singing being the ideal posture. Kneeling with silent personal prayer does not reflect our unity in the Body of Christ, filled with the Spirit of Christ.given that there is not a traditional reason against kneeling during Mass in the Roman Rite, I’m perplexed as to why a bishop would want to prevent the faithful from doing so following communion. I don’t see how it disrupts the Mass, and for some people, for reasons of their own personal piety and how they have been brought up in the Church, it is more conducive to prayer.
No. What you are pushing is inappropriate. I have never heard of such a ridiculous thing.The point is that personal prayer is inappropriate during the communion procession. People should be acting as one, standing and singing being the ideal posture. Kneeling with silent personal prayer does not reflect our unity in the Body of Christ, filled with the Spirit of Christ.
I have only been to two Tridentine Masses in my life so I’m not real familiar with them… but isn’t there a LOT of silent prayer? Evidently it was seen as valuable at some point in the church’s History. Are we just “evolving” to the point in he church where that plethora of quietness should be reduced to zero. And if so, why? I admit to preferring the Novus Ordo because I like to say the responses and sing the hymns… but the option for a little bit of quite prayer after communion seems nice too. Didn’t we alllll learn back in CCD as kids that the time after Communion was for silent thanksgiving? I believe they even taught this at my daughters CCD Communion prep last year! Something has changed…?The point is that personal prayer is inappropriate during the communion procession. People should be acting as one, standing and singing being the ideal posture. Kneeling with silent personal prayer does not reflect our unity in the Body of Christ, filled with the Spirit of Christ.