But how did that person get the gun? If guns were not sold as much as they are and were regulated more then perhaps that situation would not have happened in the first place because that person wouldn’t have possessed a gun.
I know that’s hard to accept in America but the opinion in my country is that guns should not be sold as a commercial product and should be held only by the Armed Forces and trained law enforcement.
CN, what prevents someone from making one? Unlike most illegal drugs, there is no regulated materials or tools. You can get the materials to make a firearm at any automotive junkyard. It is simple steel.
The tools used can be obtained at any good hardware store. The metal working skills necessary are actually taught in many secondary schools. A person could take classes in, say automotive body repair, and that would give them the needed skills to make a functioning firearm
I myself made a flintlock carbine, it was a particular piece that I wanted for re-enacting. I machined the pieces in my garage at home. It actually would have been easier for me to make a sub-machine gun instead of the flintlock.
The UK kindly created a sub-machine gun in WW-II that was specifically designed to be made in small garage shops using simple tools. It was called the Sten.
Here are the plans, all ready for simple download
milsurps.com/content.php?r=422-Blueprints-for-The-STEN-MKII-(complete-machine-plans
I happen to be an engineer, and picked up the skills simply by watching the guys on the plant floor do tool and die work.
So given that, how would you envision that these be restricted to Armed Forces or law enforcement? How would you prevent a person from making these and selling them to, say gang members, in much the same way illegal drugs are sold today.
Even with the type of ban you are taking about, getting a hold of a firearm would be no more difficult than getting a bag of marijuana.