J
JimG
Guest
I don’t think anyone has actually polled Muslim women as to what they think about this law. Some–many?–most?–may favor it. But no Muslim woman could answer the question truthfully in the presence of her husband.
The subject was France. Is this tit for tat or two wrongs making a right?I am ok with this for two reasons:
First, women who live under sharia law have absolutely NO say as to whether they want to wear face covering or not.
I don’t see how. They have a constitution and Muslims are vastly outnumbered.Second, while we have pockets of Islamic communities in the US, France and other European nations are dealing with the real prospect of islamic law making it’s way into their legal system and overtaking their cultural values and traditions.
I disagree. They are opposite ends of the spectrum and both are too extreme.Comparing public lewdness to covering your face is frankly ridiculous.
The Muslims who veil their women would appear to agree with you in the extreme. Even the face excites them to thoughts of fornication apparently, but wait…the men go about their business among the western dressed women, so kind of blows that theory. Maybe it’s more about subjugation and protecting their property.Public lewdness effects everybody who witnesses it, and i would guess would increase in the number of sexual crimes committed, me wearing something over my face effects nobody.
It almost makes you wonder what the purpose of these outfits is?Maybe it’s more about subjugation and protecting their property.
As far as the burqa, I find it just as offensive and out of place as a string bikini at the grocery store, only for different reasons.
Perfect. Black and faceless.
permalink )
aldona44 says:
Acceptable, modest and elegant. This is the most popular veil of the revivalist Muslim world today
( permalink )
view profile
begloved says:
This is gorgeous. I want all women of the world to dress this way. Elegance, propriety, and beauty, what woman would not feel beautiful in this?
France is not their home - I meant their ethnic home, not where they happened to emerge from a birth canal.Many were born in France and you avoid the question as to if the law is unjust.
Of course it was unjust for the Turks to dare tell the Vicar of Christ what to wear. That should be self-evident.Wearing what you want is not making anyone submit to anything. The Turks made priests (like John XXIII before he became pope) wear lay clothing, too. That was unjust.
France hasn’t claimed to be a Catholic country since the French Revolution. It’s been secular ever since.The law is not unjust. France is a Catholic country by dint of its founding as one and therefore ought to conform to Catholic law/practice/etc.
Go tell the Pope he’s wrong. The Catechism says that they pray to the same God that we do.Burqas are part of the law of a false religion and deserve no protection.
He wasn’t the Pope then, just Angelo Roncalli. Any Head of State, not as any sort of vicar, could not be told by any other country what to wear or not to wear.Of course it was unjust for the Turks to dare tell the Vicar of Christ what to wear. That should be self-evident.
Unsupportable hyperbole.European countries are forced to submit to Muslim demands all the time.
The subject was France. Is this tit for tat or two wrongs making a right?
I was refering to France.
I don’t see how. They have a constitution and Muslims are vastly outnumbered.
What does this even mean? What exactly is an “ethnic home.” I’m an American, but my family is primarily of German descent. Does that mean I should go back to Germany, perhaps Scotland?France is not their home - I meant their ethnic home, not where they happened to emerge from a birth canal.
.
So…France should be more like Saudi Arabia?Non Muslims are banned from the entire city of Mekkah.
Remember: Human rights are only infringed when Muslims are asked to conform to the mores of the non-Muslim lands to which they have come.
Wow. And what exactly is an “ethnic home”? Are you just being bigoted or did I miss that part of Western Civilization? I hear Helen Thomas has a lot of free time now, maybe you two can get together and congratulate yourselves on not being some kinda funny religion.France is not their home - I meant their ethnic home, not where they happened to emerge from a birth canal.
The law is not unjust. France is a Catholic country by dint of its founding as one and therefore ought to conform to Catholic law/practice/etc. Burqas are part of the law of a false religion and deserve no protection.
.
I know that it went secular at that time - my meaning is that France began as a Catholic nation and hence ought to remain.France hasn’t claimed to be a Catholic country since the French Revolution. It’s been secular ever since.
Technically, the same god - practically, a different one. Any idiot knows the difference.Go tell the Pope he’s wrong. The Catechism says that they pray to the same God that we do.
Ah, good point on his status. Even so, no Turk gets to tell a Christian what to wear.He wasn’t the Pope then, just Angelo Roncalli. Any Head of State, not as any sort of vicar, could not be told by any other country what to wear or not to wear.
To you, maybe.Unsupportable hyperbole.
It means where the majority of your ancestors come from. Germany, in your case.What does this even mean? What exactly is an “ethnic home.” I’m an American, but my family is primarily of German descent. Does that mean I should go back to Germany, perhaps Scotland?
Human populations are not incredibly mobile, except for nomadic tribes. Nomadic times are behind us; humans mostly settle in fixed places for long periods. “Ethnic homes” can be determined if an individual has sufficient knowledge of his or her ethnic background. It’s simple, really - just ask the Israelis.Plus you just seem to forget that human populations are incredibly mobile and I’m sure even among Arab populations there are groups that have moved between borders and different areas all the time. So even there it’s probably nearly impossible to determine what an exact “ethnic home” is.
In terms of this, yes. It’s like citing Mexican immigration law for a better example of how American border policy can be. It’s not saying “make America more like Mexico”, just that Mexican law in that case is superior.So…France should be more like Saudi Arabia?
Because I’m White I don’t get to have ethnically-based ideas? Who’s the racist, now?Wow. And what exactly is an “ethnic home”? Are you just being bigoted or did I miss that part of Western Civilization? I hear Helen Thomas has a lot of free time now, maybe you two can get together and congratulate yourselves on not being some kinda funny religion.
No, it’s a just response to the creeping Islamicization of Europe. Good on the French.Only a few hundred women in France wear these. The French government needed a distraction from economic problems and all of you are playing along.
That’s an imperialist viewpoint. Surely French citizens can call France their home? Like all ethnicities in the US?France is not their home - I meant their ethnic home, not where they happened to emerge from a birth canal.
I disagree.The law is not unjust.
Now, being a freedom-loving American I cannot but wonder at your remarks. I thought there was freedom of religion in France, if the garb denotes any religion.France is a Catholic country by dint of its founding as one and therefore ought to conform to Catholic law/practice/etc. Burqas are part of the law of a false religion and deserve no protection.
Well, he wasn’t pope then. You let France tell folks what to wear but the Turks could not do that in Turkey? How inconsistent!Of course it was unjust for the Turks to dare tell the Vicar of Christ what to wear. That should be self-evident.
It serves those imperialists right.European countries are forced to submit to Muslim demands all the time. Every time Muslims riot or stage an angry protest, Europeans bend under the pressure. Their Crusader ancestors must be rolling in their graves.
Can’t we all get along?The few cases where Europeans defy Muslim bullying are to be lauded. At least that much fight is left in Europe.
Hmmm. Could Franciscans shop there?Just went to town to fill my wifes car up with gas. As I was entering the building I noticed a sticker on the front door that said “Remove Hoods Before Entering”. I’ve been in that place 1,000 times and I’d never noticed it had it not been for this thread. Wonder if we will ever see a sign that includes Burqa’s as well. Someone said it was not religious garb, then a store owner would be able to ask them to leave or remove it wouldn’t they?
LOL, considering the location there is no telling what the clerk would do if a group of Franciscans walked in. There is a pretty good chance they have never seen a nun in real life much less a monk.Hmmm. Could Franciscans shop there?![]()
LOL! Who’d say that? My sister, my daughter, and my mother would put a man who said that to them in his place in an instant.What’s the difference between Islam telling women they have to cover fully and Catholic men telling women they should wear dresses & skirts ONLY because pants on women are a sin, hmmmm?