As I noted above, I’m just trying to see it from both sides — to give the bullies justice (which, by the way, I don’t think they deserve), and to give them an opportunity to explain themselves. They, of course, will not do a very good job of it, because bullying is ultimately indefensible.When you say you could “possibly understand” some/all of these so-called defences, you need to look a person in the eye who is actually being bullied and explain to them why;
…they are the one who “has to be” at the bottom of the pecking order.
…bullying is “just a part of life” for them
…learning to fight and being “tough in life” somehow isn’t working for them because they have low vision and poor mobility and aren’t as big as the bully.
… they never got a vote when the bullies all got together and decided who the “nerds, dweebs and dorks” are.
…“not reacting” and trying to “just ignore” the bully hasn’t had the desired effect in their experience because so many bullies keep ratcheting up the aggression until they get a reaction.
…it’s always people who aren’t being bullied telling them that they have to just “suffer thru it”
From what I have observed of bullying, it falls into the following categories (I don’t intend this to be exhaustive):
- doing it to get laughs or to enhance themselves, so they imagine it, in the eyes of their peers
- because it is something “fun to do” to the underdog
- because it becomes a way to punish or torment those who are “different”
- as a means of solidarity and self-affirmation for the group (as with “mean girls”)
- because the bullied person is a “target” whom it is just too tempting not to torment
- and, as noted above, to try and get a reaction out of them, a reaction that is “fun” to observe
Last edited: