I do. Religion by its very nature requires conversion. When two people of different faiths discuss religion, they do so from the perspective that each has the correct religion, and that the other would be better off converting to his or her religion. That is in the nature of beast. That is what a religious discussion by nature tries to achieve. You cannot discuss religion with someone of another faith without attempting to convert them. That is as much true of a Catholic as it is of a Mormon. If you are not trying to convert others, you should be. Otherwise you shouldn’t be discussing religion with them at all. To discuss religion with someone of another faith, means trying to convert them.
She hasn’t had any “bad experiences with Mormons”. She is an apostate. Her problem is with Mormonism, not with “a few Mormons”.
There are no “barriers” between Catholics and Mormons. They get along just fine. The folks you are dealing with here are not “Catholics”. They are Mormon apostates. They are apostate-Mormons-turned-false-Catholic. They have an eternal enmity with Mormonism, and want to attack and destroy it by all means possible. “Compromise” is not acceptable. “Building bridges” is not an objective. “Removing barriers” is not the done thing. Destruction of Mormonism is the only possible objective with them. Well, there is only one way to deal with that, and that is to meet them head on, attack them and destroy them. If you don’t have the stomach to do that, you get out of their way. You don’t debate with them. If you try to play “softly softly” with them, they will bring you to grief.
You can’t be “nice” to the devil. That is not the kind of treatment that he appreciates. You hit him hard, knock him flat, and give him a hole in the head. That is what he is asks for, and that is what he deserves. If you don’t have the wherewithal to do that, then you get out of his way. You don’t mess with the devil.
zerinus